scholarly journals Graphite-bearing and graphite-depleted basement rocks in the Dufferin Lake zone, south-central Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Pascal ◽  
K M Ansdell ◽  
I R Annesley
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Pascal ◽  
K Ansdell ◽  
I R Annesley ◽  
D Jiricka ◽  
G Witt ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 619-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjolaine Pascal ◽  
Marie-Christine Boiron ◽  
Kevin Ansdell ◽  
Irvine R. Annesley ◽  
Tom Kotzer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (5) ◽  
pp. 637-637
Author(s):  
Marjolaine Pascal ◽  
Marie-Christine Boiron ◽  
Kevin Ansdell ◽  
Irvine R. Annesley ◽  
Tom Kotzer ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bruneton

The Cigar Lake uranium deposit occurs within the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Like other major uranium deposits of the basin, it is located at the unconformity separating Helikian sandstones of the Athabasca Group from Aphebian metasediments and plutonic rocks of the Wollaston Group. The Athabasca Group was deposited in an intra-continental sedimentary basin that was filled by fluviatile terrestrial quartz sandstones and conglomerates. The group appears undeformed and its actual maximum thickness is about 1500 m. On the eastern side of the basin, the detrital units correspond to the Manitou Falls Formations where most of the uranium deposits are located. The Lower Pelitic unit of the Wollaston Group, which lies directly on the Archean basement, is considered to be the most favourable horizon for uranium mineralization. During the Hudsonian orogeny (1800–1900 Ma), the group underwent polyphase deformation and upper amphibolite facies metamorphism. The Hudsonian orogeny was followed by a long period of erosion and weathering and the development of a paleoweathering profile.On the Waterbury Lake property, the Manitou Falls Formation is 250–500 m thick and corresponds to units MFd, MFc, and MFb. The conglomeratic MFb unit hosts the Cigar Lake deposit. However, the basal conglomerate is absent at the deposit, wedging out against an east–west, 20 m high, pre-Athabasca basement ridge, on top of which is located the orebody.Two major lithostructural domains are present in the metamorphic basement of the property: (1) a southern area composed mainly of pelitic metasediments (Wollaston Domain) and (2) a northern area with large lensoid granitic domes (Mudjatik Domain). The Cigar Lake east–west pelitic basin, which contains the deposit, is located in the transitional zone between the two domains. The metamorphic basement rocks in the basin consist mainly of graphitic metapelitic gneisses and calcsilicate gneisses, which are inferred to be part of the Lower Pelitic unit. Graphite- and pyrite-rich "augen gneisses," an unusual facies within the graphitic metapelitic gneisses, occur primarily below the Cigar Lake orebody.The mineralogy and geochemistry of the graphitic metapelitic gneisses suggest that they were originally shales. The abundance of magnesium in the intercalated carbonates layers indicates an evaporitic origin.The structural framework is dominated by large northeast–southwest lineaments and wide east–west mylonitic corridors. These mylonites, which contain the augen gneisses, are considered to be the most favourable features for the concentration of uranium mineralization.Despite the presence of the orebody, large areas of the Waterbury Lake property remain totally unexplored and open for new discoveries.


2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 122-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vojtěch Janoušek ◽  
Yingde Jiang ◽  
David Buriánek ◽  
Karel Schulmann ◽  
Pavel Hanžl ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (12) ◽  
pp. 1875-1888
Author(s):  
Erin E. Adlakha ◽  
Keiko Hattori ◽  
Mitchell J. Kerr ◽  
Brandon M. Boucher

Abstract Titanium oxide minerals along the P2 fault in the eastern Athabasca Basin are characterized to constrain their origin and the geological history of the area. Two types of rutile are recognized in the basement rocks. Early rutile is disseminated in graphitic metapelite and quartzite, and it formed during regional metamorphism and post-metamorphic hydrothermal activity. Late rutile occurs as a needle-like alteration product of mica and likely formed during retrogression of the basement. In graphitic metapelite, early rutile commonly occurs with an assemblage of oxy-dravite, quartz, graphite, zircon, pyrite, biotite, and muscovite. In quartzite, rutile occurs with quartz, sillimanite, muscovite, and zircon. Metamorphic rutile is characterized by high Nb/Ta ratios (up to 47) with high concentrations of U (up to 126 ppm) and V4+ (up to 1.44 wt%; V valance calculated from EPMA data). Hydrothermal rutile contains distinctly low Nb/Ta (as low as 4.80) with high Ta (≤3050 ppm), and relatively low V (as V 3+; as low as 0.02 wt%) and U (as low as 9.06 ppm), reflecting fluids in reduced oxidation conditions. Anatase forms small anhedral (rarely coarse and euhedral) grains in the basal sandstones and altered basement rocks. In sandstones, anatase occurs with the late diagenetic mineral assemblage, whereas in basement rocks it commonly occurs with the clay-sized minerals related to uranium mineralization. In both rocks, anatase likely formed through the dissolution of rutile and/or other Ti-bearing minerals. Anatase is characterized by variably high Fe (up to 0.99 wt%; possibly contributed by hematite micro-or nanoinclusions) and U (up to 180 ppm). The mineral assemblages and composition of anatase suggest its protracted crystallization from relatively low temperature, oxidizing, acidic, uraniferous fluids of the sandstones during late diagenesis and hydrothermal activity. Therefore, the occurrence of anatase records the incursion of basin fluids into the basement, and the interaction of basement rocks with fluids responsible for the formation of the McArthur River uranium deposit. The results of this study confirm that Ti-oxides are useful in unraveling the geological history of an area that underwent prolonged hydrothermal activity.


Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 365-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph R. B. von Frese ◽  
Michael B. Jones ◽  
Jeong Woo Kim ◽  
Wen Sheng Li

Geologic interpretation of Ohio's magnetic or gravity anomalies is hindered by the effects of anomaly superposition and source ambiguity inherent to potential field analysis. A common approach to minimizing interpretational ambiguities is to consider analyses of anomaly correlations. A spectral procedure is adapted which correlates anomaly fields in the frequency domain to produce filters separating positively and negatively correlated, as well as null correlated features. The correlation filter passes or rejects wavenumbers between coregistered fields based on the correlation coefficient between common wavenumbers as given by the cosine of their phase difference. This procedure is applied to reduced‐to‐pole magnetic and first vertical derivative gravity anomalies of Ohio for mapping correlative magnetization and density contrasts within the basement rocks. The analysis reveals predominantly positive correlations between anomaly maxima and minima. Correlative anomaly maxima may be generally modeled as mafic bodies of the upper crust. They map out a possible dike complex in northwestern Ohio, a batholith as a possible source of volcanic rocks in southwestern Ohio, and numerous mafic bodies related presumably to Keweenawan rifting and Grenville tectonics. Correlative anomaly minima include several isolated features that may define felsic terranes of the upper crust, and ringed features around some of the larger mafic bodies which also may contain significant edge‐effect components. A large circular feature in south‐central Ohio involves correlative minima of a possible anorthosite body that is ringed by an inversely correlative zone of positive density and negative magnetization contrasts. Another prominent negative correlation involves an extensive area of possible extrusive rocks with positive magnetization and negative density contrasts just north of the batholith in southwestern Ohio.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document