scholarly journals Petrology of basement rocks at the Rabbit Lake deposit and progressive alteration of pitchblende in an oxidation zone of uranium deposits in Saskatchewan

1979 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Y H Rimsaite
Keyword(s):  
Oxidation Zone ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Basement Rocks

Geological environment of the Cigar Lake uranium deposit

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 653-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bruneton
Keyword(s):  
Uranium Deposit ◽  
Transitional Zone ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Structural Framework ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Metamorphic Basement ◽  
Basement Ridge ◽  
Archean Basement ◽  
East West

The Cigar Lake uranium deposit occurs within the Athabasca Basin of northern Saskatchewan, Canada. Like other major uranium deposits of the basin, it is located at the unconformity separating Helikian sandstones of the Athabasca Group from Aphebian metasediments and plutonic rocks of the Wollaston Group. The Athabasca Group was deposited in an intra-continental sedimentary basin that was filled by fluviatile terrestrial quartz sandstones and conglomerates. The group appears undeformed and its actual maximum thickness is about 1500 m. On the eastern side of the basin, the detrital units correspond to the Manitou Falls Formations where most of the uranium deposits are located. The Lower Pelitic unit of the Wollaston Group, which lies directly on the Archean basement, is considered to be the most favourable horizon for uranium mineralization. During the Hudsonian orogeny (1800–1900 Ma), the group underwent polyphase deformation and upper amphibolite facies metamorphism. The Hudsonian orogeny was followed by a long period of erosion and weathering and the development of a paleoweathering profile.On the Waterbury Lake property, the Manitou Falls Formation is 250–500 m thick and corresponds to units MFd, MFc, and MFb. The conglomeratic MFb unit hosts the Cigar Lake deposit. However, the basal conglomerate is absent at the deposit, wedging out against an east–west, 20 m high, pre-Athabasca basement ridge, on top of which is located the orebody.Two major lithostructural domains are present in the metamorphic basement of the property: (1) a southern area composed mainly of pelitic metasediments (Wollaston Domain) and (2) a northern area with large lensoid granitic domes (Mudjatik Domain). The Cigar Lake east–west pelitic basin, which contains the deposit, is located in the transitional zone between the two domains. The metamorphic basement rocks in the basin consist mainly of graphitic metapelitic gneisses and calcsilicate gneisses, which are inferred to be part of the Lower Pelitic unit. Graphite- and pyrite-rich "augen gneisses," an unusual facies within the graphitic metapelitic gneisses, occur primarily below the Cigar Lake orebody.The mineralogy and geochemistry of the graphitic metapelitic gneisses suggest that they were originally shales. The abundance of magnesium in the intercalated carbonates layers indicates an evaporitic origin.The structural framework is dominated by large northeast–southwest lineaments and wide east–west mylonitic corridors. These mylonites, which contain the augen gneisses, are considered to be the most favourable features for the concentration of uranium mineralization.Despite the presence of the orebody, large areas of the Waterbury Lake property remain totally unexplored and open for new discoveries.

Structural evolution and related implications for uranium mineralization in the Patterson Lake corridor, southwestern Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada

2020 ◽  
pp. geochem2020-030
Author(s):  
Dillon Johnstone ◽  
Kathryn Bethune ◽  
Colin Card ◽  
Victoria Tschirhart
Keyword(s):  
Structural Evolution ◽  
Uranium Mineralization ◽  
Ductile Deformation ◽  
Normal Faults ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Transfer Faults ◽  
Dextral Strike Slip

The Patterson Lake corridor is situated along the southwest margin of the Athabasca Basin and contains several basement-hosted uranium deposits and prospects. Drill core investigations during this study have determined that granite, granodiorite, mafic and alkali intrusive basement rocks are entrained in a deep-seated northeast-striking subvertical heterogeneous high-strain zone defined by anastomosing ductile to semi-brittle shears and brittle faults. The earliest phases of ductile deformation (D1/2), linked with Taltson (1.94–1.92 Ga) orogenesis, involved interference between early fold sets (F1/2) and development of an associated ductile transposition foliation (S1/2). During subsequent Snowbird (ca. 1.91–1.90 Ga) tectonism, this composite foliation was re-folded (D3) by northeast-trending buckle-style folds (F3), including a regional fold centered on the Clearwater aeromagnetic high. In continuum with D3, a network of dextral-reverse chloritic-graphitic shears, with C-S geometry, formed initially (D4a) and progressed to more discrete, spaced semi-brittle structures (D4b; ca. 1.900–1.819 Ga). Basin development (D5a; <ca. 1.819 Ga) was marked by a set of north-striking normal faults and related east- and northeast-striking transfer faults that accommodated subsidence. Primary uranium mineralization (D5b; ∼1.45 Ga) was facilitated by brittle reactivation of northeast-striking basement shears in response to west-southwest - east-northeast-directed compressional stress (σ1). Uraninite was emplaced along σ1-parallel extension fractures and dilational zones formed at linkages between northeast- and east-northeast-striking dextral strike-slip faults. Uranium remobilization (D5c) occurred after σ1 shifted to west-northwest – east-southeast, giving rise to regional east- and southeast-striking conjugate faults, along which mafic dykes (1.27 Ga and 1.16 Ga) intruded.Thematic collection: This article is part of the Uranium Fluid Pathways collection available at: https://www.lyellcollection.org/cc/uranium-fluid-pathways

scholarly journals Insights into B-Mg-Metasomatism at the Ranger U Deposit (NT, Australia) and Comparison with Canadian Unconformity-Related U Deposits

Minerals ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joséphine Gigon ◽  
Roger G. Skirrow ◽  
Matthieu Harlaux ◽  
Antonin Richard ◽  
Julien Mercadier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Isotopic Composition ◽  
Isotopic Signature ◽  
Northern Territory ◽  
Crystalline Basement ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Fe Content ◽  
Uranium Mineralisation ◽  
Uranium Exploration ◽  
Boron Isotopic Composition

The Ranger deposit (Northern Territory, Australia) is one of the largest uranium deposits in the world. Uranium mineralisation occurs in crystalline basement rocks and is thought to belong to the unconformity-related category. In order to address the sources of magnesium and boron, and the temperature of the fluids related to boron and magnesium metasomatism that occurred shortly before and during the main uranium stage, in situ analyses of chlorite and tourmaline were carried out. The chemical composition of tourmaline shows an elevated X-site vacancy and a low Fetot/(Fetot + Mg) ratio typical of Mg-foitite. Uranium-related chlorite has relatively low Fe content (0.28–0.83 apfu) and high Mg content (3.08–3.84 apfu), with Si/Al = 1.08−1.22 and Mg/(Mg + Fetot) = 0.80−0.93 indicating a composition lying between the clinochlore and Mg-amesite fields. Chlorite composition indicates crystallisation temperature of 101–163 °C. The boron isotopic composition of tourmaline shows a range of δ11B values of ~1–9‰. A model is proposed involving two boron sources that contribute to a mixed isotopic signature: (i) evaporated seawater, which is typically enriched in magnesium and boron (δ11B ~ 40‰), and (ii) boron from the crystalline basement (δ11B ~ −30 to +10‰), which appears to be the dominant source. Collectively, the data indicate similar tourmaline chemistry but significant differences of tourmaline boron isotopic composition and chlorite chemistry between the Ranger deposit and some of the Canadian unconformity-related uranium deposits. However, lithogeochemical exploration approaches based on identification of boron- and magnesium-enriched zones may be usefully applied to uranium exploration in the Northern Territory.

The mode of occurrence and distribution of uranium deposits

1979 ◽  
Vol 291 (1381) ◽  
pp. 289-300 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Low Cost ◽  
Crustal Thickening ◽  
Metamorphic Rocks ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Carbonaceous Matter ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Reducing Conditions ◽  
Clastic Sediments ◽  
Mode Of Occurrence ◽  
Recent Origin

Uranium deposits occur in association with igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic rocks. The bulk of low-cost reserves, however, occurs in Precambrian rocks or in Phanerozoic sediments immediately overlying the basement. In basement rocks, as well as in more recent rocks, major uranium deposits are spatially associated with leucogranites. In Phanerozoic sediments, close to the basement uranium is enriched in continental clastic formations under reducing conditions. Favourable lithologies are alternating horizons of clay and sandstone containing carbonaceous matter. Metamorphic developments are associated with zones of crustal thickening with a world-wide era of concentration at around 1900-1700 Ma ago. Uranium is also enriched in more recent metamorphosed clastic sediments. Deposits directly associated with igneous rocks tend to occur in unsaturated facies rich in volatiles. Granitic and alaskitic pegmatites also carry economic amounts of uranium. The most important secondary deposits of recent origin are those occurring in carbonateor sulphate-cemented sediments.

Thermotectonic events recorded by U-Pb geochronology and Zr-in-rutile thermometry of Ti oxides in basement rocks along the P2 fault, eastern Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Adlakha ◽  
K. Hattori
Keyword(s):  
Regional Metamorphism ◽  
Hydrothermal Activity ◽  
Uranium Mineralization ◽  
Uranium Deposits ◽  
Athabasca Basin ◽  
The North ◽  
Basement Rocks ◽  
Major Fault ◽  
World Class ◽  
Basement Structures

Basement rocks below the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan, have been intensely altered through paleoweathering and multiple hydrothermal events, including the formation of world-class unconformity-type uranium deposits. Here, we demonstrate the utility of Ti-oxide thermochronology for identifying thermotectonic events in these altered rocks leading to uranium mineralization along basement structures. Rutile grains along the P2 fault, a major fault in the eastern Athabasca Basin, exhibit 207Pb/206Pb ages of ca. 1850−1700 Ma, with a weighted mean of 1757 ± 6 Ma (mean square of weighted deviation [MSWD] = 1.4, n = 116). The older ages (&gt;1770 Ma) record regional metamorphism reaching a temperature of 875 °C during the Trans-Hudson orogeny. Pb diffusion modeling indicates that metamorphic rutile should exhibit cooling ages of 1760−1750 Ma. Rutile grains showing young ages, &lt;1750 Ma, reflect isotopic resetting during regional asthenospheric upwelling between 1770 and 1730 Ma related to the emplacement of the Kivalliq igneous suite to the north. This thermotectonic event (temperature &gt; 550 °C) promoted hydrothermal activity to produce silicified rocks, i.e., “quartzite,” along the P2 fault, which later focused mineralizing fluids for unconformity-type uranium deposits. The young rutile ages also indicate that the basement rocks remained hot until 1700 Ma, providing the maximum age for the deposition of the Athabasca sediments. Anatase yields a concordia age of 1569 ± 31 Ma (MSWD = 0.30, n = 5), which is within uncertainty of the oldest ages for uraninite of the McArthur River deposit. This age corresponds to the incursion of basinal fluids in the basement along the P2 fault during uranium mineralization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document