scholarly journals Minimally invasive management of dorsiflexion contracture at the metatarsophalangeal joint and plantarflexion contracture at the proximal interphalangeal joint of the fifth toe

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Mariano De Prado ◽  
Pedro-Luis Ripoll ◽  
Pau Golanó ◽  
Javier Vaquero ◽  
Nicola Maffulli

Several surgical options have been described to manage persistent dorsiflexion contracture at the metatarsophalangeal joint and plantarflexion contracture at the proximal interphalangeal joint of the fifth toe. We describe a minimally invasive technique for the management of this deformity. We perform a plantar closing wedge osteotomy of the 5th toe at the base of its proximal phalanx associated with a lateral condylectomy of the head of the proximal phalanx and at the base of the middle phalanx. Lastly, a complete tenotomy of the deep and superficial flexor tendons and of the tendon of the extensor digitorum longus is undertaken. Correction of cock-up fifth toe deformity is achieved using a minimally invasive approach.

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Bayod ◽  
Marta Losa-Iglesias ◽  
Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa-Vallejo ◽  
Juan Carlos Prados-Frutos ◽  
Kevin T. Jules ◽  
...  

Correction of claw or hammer toe deformity can be achieved using various techniques, including proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis (PIPJA), flexor digitorum longus tendon transfer (FDLT), and flexor digitorum brevis transfer. PIPJA is the oldest technique, but is associated with significant complications (infection, fracture, delayed union, and nonunion). FDLT eliminates the deformity, but leads to loss of stability during gait. Flexor digitorum brevis tendon transfer (FDBT) seems to be the best surgical alternative, but it is a recent technique with still limited results. In this work, these three techniques have been analyzed by means of the finite-element method and a comparative analysis was done with the aim of extracting advantages and drawbacks. The results show that the best technique for reducing dorsal displacement of the proximal phalanx is PIPJA (2.28 mm versus 2.73 mm for FDLT, and 3.31 mm for FDBT). However, the best technique for reducing stresses on phalanges is FDLT or FDBT (a reduction of approximately 35% regarding the pathologic case versus the increase of 7% for the PIPJA in tensile stresses, and a reduction of approximately 40% versus 25% for the PIPJA in compression stresses). Moreover, the distribution of stresses in the entire phalanx is different for the PIPJA case. These facts could cause problems for patients, in particular, those with pain in the surgical toe.


2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 916-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kurt F. Konkel ◽  
Andrea G. Menger ◽  
Sharon Ann Retzlaff

Background: Fixed flexion deformity of the proximal interphalangeal joint with or without hyperextension of the metatarsophalangeal joint is one of the most common foot deformities. Many operative options have been recommended. Complaints after operative procedures include a too straight toe, floating toe, painful toe recurvatum, mallet toe, pin track infection, broken hardware, and the necessity of removing hardware. A proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis for hammertoe deformity using a 2-mm absorbable pin for internal fixation is described. Methods: The results of 48 toe arthrodeses in 35 patients were reviewed. Followup ranged from 16 to 58 (average 38.5) months. Results: The procedure is simple and safe for the correction of painful rigid hammertoe deformities. Patient satisfaction was high, complications were minimal, and followup required no pin management or removal. Conclusions: This procedure can be used for hammer toe deformities requiring surgery when the metatarsophalangeal joint is stable, the skin is not compromised, and the intramedullary canal of the proximal phalanx is 2.0 mm or less. It also has been useful in stabilizing hammertoe correction when there are severe pre-existing metal allergies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 1230-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Vanni ◽  
Francesco Saverio Sirabella ◽  
Renato Galzio ◽  
Vincenzo Salini ◽  
Vincenzo Magliani

OBJECT The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of an alternative minimally invasive technique for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). METHODS This was designed as a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point evaluation (PROBE) study. The active comparison was double tunnels technique (DTT) (Group A, 110 patients) versus standard open decompression of the median nerve (control [Group B], 110 patients). Patient recruitment started in January 2011. The primary outcomes were the functional Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ) scores and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain (pVAS) at Weeks 2 and 4, and at Months 3, 6, and 12. The secondary outcome was the aesthetics (aVAS) score at Weeks 2 and 4, and at Months 3, 6, and 12. RESULTS The Student t-test and ANOVA were used, and the results were considered statistically significant if the p value was ≤ 0.05 for continuous variables. The DTT is a tissue-sparing approach that allows the surgeon to limit the length of the incision (0.6 ± 0.05 cm) and to respect the palmar fascia and the subcutaneous tissue. Recovery from wrist pain, night pain, numbness, stiffness, and weakness was achieved more effectively and quickly compared with the standard approach. Better BCTSQ, pVAS, and aVAS scores were observed in Group A. CONCLUSIONS The DTT is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of CTS. This technique entails faster recovery times, better aesthetic outcomes, and lower risks of complications.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 606-613
Author(s):  
Rafael A Vega ◽  
Jeffrey I Traylor ◽  
Ahmed Habib ◽  
Laurence D Rhines ◽  
Claudio E Tatsui ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Epidural spinal cord compression (ESCC) is a common and severe cause of morbidity in cancer patients. Minimally invasive surgical techniques may be utilized to preserve neurological function and permit the use of radiation to maximize local control. Minimally invasive techniques are associated with lower morbidity. OBJECTIVE To describe a novel, minimally invasive operative technique for the management of metastatic ESCC. METHODS A minimally invasive approach was used to cannulate the pedicles of the thoracic vertebrae, which were then held in place by Kirschner wires (K-wires). Following open decompression of the spinal cord, cannulated screws were placed percutaneously with stereotactic guidance through the pedicles followed by cement induction. Stereotactic radiosurgery is performed in the postoperative period for residual metastatic disease in the vertebral body. RESULTS The minimally invasive technique used in this case reduced tissue damage and optimized subsequent recovery without compromising the quality of decompression or the extent of metastatic tumor resection. Development of more minimally invasive techniques for the management of metastatic ESCC has the potential to facilitate healing and preserve quality of life in patients with systemic malignancy. CONCLUSION ESCC from vertebral metastases poses a challenge to treat in the context of minimizing potential risks to preserve quality of life. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with cement augmentation provides a minimally invasive alternative for definitive treatment of these patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 112-112
Author(s):  
Yong Yuan

Abstract Background This study was conducted to optimize the surgical procedures for single-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy, and to explore its potential advantages over multi-port minimally invasive esophagectomy. Methods For single-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy, the patient was placed in left lateral-prone position and a 4-cm incision through the 4th-5th intercostal space was taken on the postaxillary line. The 10-mm camera and two or three surgical instruments were used for the VATS esophagectomy and radical mediastinal lymph node dissection. The camera position was different for the upper and lower mediastinal regions. Mobilization of stomach was conducted via multiple-port laparoscopic approach. Cervical end-to-side anastomosis was completed by hand-sewn procedures.A propensity-matched comparison was made between the single-port and four-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy groups. Results From 2014 to 2016, 56 matched patients were analyzed. There was no conversion to open surgery or operative mortality. The use of single-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy increased the length of operation time in comparison with using multiple-port minimally invasive technique (mean, 257 vs. 216 min, P = 0.026). The time taken for thoracic procedure in the single-port group was significant longer that in the multi-port group (mean, 126 vs. 84 min, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between groups in the number of lymph nodes dissected, blood loss, complications or hospital stay (P > 0.05). In single-port thoracoscopic group, the pain in the abdomen was more severe than that in the chest (P = 0.042). The pain scores for postoperative day 1 and day 7 were significantly lower in the single-port group as compared with multiple-port group (P = 0.038 and P < 0.001), a similar trend could be seen for the pain score on postoperative day 3 (P = 0.058). Conclusion Single-port thoracoscopic esophagectomy contributes to reducing postoperative pain with an acceptable increase of operation time, which does not compromise surgical radicality and has similar short-term postoperative outcomes when compared with multiple-port minimally invasive approach. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document