scholarly journals Lyme carditis mimicking giant cell arteritis

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Krati Chauhan
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
Interesting Case ◽  
Temporal Artery Biopsy ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
System Disease ◽  
Lyme Carditis

Presenting an interesting case of a patient who complained of myalgias, fatigue, headache, jaw claudication and scalp tenderness. Patient’s physical examination was unremarkable. Laboratory findings showed elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein, bilateral temporal artery biopsy results were negative and first degree atrioventricular block was seen on electrocardiogram. Serology for <em>Borrelia burgdorferi</em> was positive; patient was diagnosed with Lyme carditis and treated with doxycycline. Lyme is a tick-borne, multi-system disease and occasionally its presentation may mimic giant cell arteritis. On follow-up there was complete resolution of symptoms and electrocardiogram findings.

THU0309 UNILATERAL TEMPORAL ARTERY BIOPSY IS SUFFICIENT FOR DIAGNOSING GIANT CELL ARTERITIS IF THE SERUM C-REACTIVE PROTEIN LEVEL IS 10 MG/DL OR HIGHER

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 383-384
Author(s):  
T. Kise ◽  
E. Takamasu ◽  
Y. Miyoshi ◽  
N. Yokogawa ◽  
K. Shimada
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Temporal Artery Biopsy ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Positive Group ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Discordance Rate ◽  
Serum Crp

Background:Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is the gold standard for diagnosing giant cell arteritis (GCA). However, previous studies have reported that the discordance rate of TAB is 3-45%,i.e., in unliteral TAB, GCA may be overlooked in one in five patients, approximately. Evidence as to whether bilateral TAB should be performed initially or one-sided TAB is sufficient for diagnosing GCA is lacking.Objectives:To investigate the predictors of patients with GCA in whom one-sided TAB is sufficient.Methods:The present study was a cross-sectional, single center study conducted from April 1, 2011 to July 31, 2019 at Tokyo Metropolitan Tama Medical Center. Of all consecutive GCA cases for which bilateral TAB was performed, bilaterally positive cases and unilaterally positive cases were extracted as bilateral positive group (BPG) and unilateral positive group (UPG), respectively. GCA was defined in accordance with the classification criteria of the 1990 American College of Rheumatology, and GCA was diagnosed if no other etiology was found within six months after beginning of high-dose glucocorticoid treatment. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data were obtained from the medical records, and the BPG and the UPG were compared statistically in each variable. Statistical significance was defined asp< 0.05.Results:During study, 264 biopsies were performed for 145 cases, who suspected GCA and underwent TAB. The pathological positivity rate was 26.1% (68 / 264 biopsies). Of these, 53 cases had final diagnosis of GCA, in which 43 cases were biopsy proven GCA. Thirty-seven biopsy proven GCA with bilateral TAB were enrolled; 64.9% women; mean (SD) age 75 (8.9) years; median [IQR] TAB length 17.5 [13.0,20.0] mm; headache 54.1%; jaw claudication 45.9%; scalp tenderness 16.2%; temporal artery (TA) tenderness 32.4%; TA engorgement 32.4%; TA pulse abnormality 5.4%; visual symptoms 2.7%; a fever of 38.5°C or higher 40.5%; shoulder girdle pain 48.6%; imaging of aortitis or arteritis 40.5%; median [IQR] white blood cell 9,100 [7200, 12050] /μl; median [IQR] platelet cell 37.5 [27.0, 46.3] ×104/μl; median [IQR] C-reactive protein (CRP) 10.1 [3.9, 16.5] mg/dL; erythrocyte sedimentation rate [IQR] 105 [66, 129] mm/h. Thirty-one in 37 cases were positive bilaterally while 6 in 37 cases were positive unilaterally; and the discordance rate was 16.2%. The median sample length after formalin fixation was 19.0 mm for the BPG and 14.5 mm for the UPG (p= 0.171). The parameters above were compared between UPG and BPG. Of these, only the serum CRP value (mg/dL) differed statistically between groups, and the median value of the two groups was 10.6 and 6.5, respectively (median test:p= 0.031). To predict BPG, in whom unilateral TAB is sufficient for diagnosing GCA, the cut-off value of serum CRP with a specificity of 100% and a sensitivity of 61.3% was set at 9.3 mg/dL (ROC analysis: AUC 0.726).Conclusion:When the serum CRP level is 10 mg/dL or higher in GCA suspected patients, an unilateral TAB alone was sufficient for an accurate diagnosis.References:[1]Hellmich, B, et al.Ann Rheum Dis2020;79(1):19-30.[2]Breuer, GS, et al.J Rheumatol. 2009;36(4):794-796.[3]Czyz CN, et al.Vascular2019;27(4):347-351.[4]Durling B, et al.Can J Ophthalmol2014;49(2):157-161.Figure.Comparison of median CRP levels between unilaterally positive group and bilaterally positive group.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Novel ultrasonographic Halo Score for giant cell arteritis: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and association with ocular ischaemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kornelis S M van der Geest ◽  
Frances Borg ◽  
Abdul Kayani ◽  
Davy Paap ◽  
Prisca Gondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Vascular Inflammation ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
A Prospective Study

ObjectivesUltrasound of temporal and axillary arteries may reveal vessel wall inflammation in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA). We developed a ultrasound scoring system to quantify the extent of vascular inflammation and investigated its diagnostic accuracy and association with clinical factors in GCA.MethodsThis is a prospective study including 89 patients suspected of having GCA, of whom 58 had a confirmed clinical diagnosis of GCA after 6 months follow-up. All patients underwent bilateral ultrasound examination of the three temporal artery (TA) segments and axillary arteries, prior to TA biopsy. The extent of vascular inflammation was quantified by (1) counting the number of TA segments and axillary arteries with a halo and (2) calculating a composite Halo Score that also incorporated the thickness of each halo.ResultsHalo counts and Halo Scores showed moderate diagnostic accuracy for a clinical diagnosis of GCA. They correlated positively with systemic inflammation. When compared with the halo count, the Halo Score correlated better with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and allowed to firmly establish the diagnosis of GCA in more patients. Higher halo counts and Halo Scores were associated with a higher risk of ocular ischaemia. They allowed to identify subgroups of patients with low risk (≤5%) and high risk of ocular ischaemia (>30%).ConclusionsUltrasound halo scoring allows to quantify the extent of vascular inflammation in GCA. Extensive vascular inflammation on ultrasound may provide strong diagnostic confirmation and associates with ocular ischaemia in GCA.

scholarly journals P206 Rethinking old biomarkers: novel predictors of giant cell arteritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamas Somoskeoy ◽  
Alexandra Bourn ◽  
Sally Knights ◽  
Ben Mulhearn
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
Temporal Artery Biopsy ◽  
Rapid Reduction ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Individual Parameter ◽  
Predictive Values

Abstract Background/Aims  Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is a large vessel vasculitis mainly affecting the arteries of the head and neck which, if untreated, may lead to permanent vision loss. Glucocorticoids are highly effective at turning off inflammation but come with toxic side effects, making prompt diagnosis essential. There is no gold-standard investigation for GCA. Although specific, temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is only positive in approximately 25% of cases making it problematic as a rule-in diagnostic test. Vascular ultrasound may aid diagnosis but there is a rapid reduction in sensitivity with glucocorticoid use and it is not yet universally available. Diagnosis therefore requires the integration of clinical judgment with blood tests measuring inflammation, imaging, and biopsy. Aims:Identify which components of the history, examination and laboratory findings are most predictive of a positive diagnosis of GCA in the local region of Yeovil District Hospital, and to investigate the usefulness of alternative blood biomarkers. Methods  Data was collected from GCA clinic attendances between August 2018 and February 2020 using electronic notes, clinic letters and the pathology system. Predictive values, sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated for each individual parameter and for groups of parameters. Results  Ninety-one patients presented to GCA clinic in the 18 months studied. Median age was 71 and 73% were female. 56 patients with suspected disease went on to have TAB, of which 38/56 (68%) were of adequate length ( &gt; =10mm), and of those, 12/38 (32%) confirmed a diagnosis of GCA. 43/91 (47%) patients were ultimately diagnosed biopsy proven or suspected GCA. Headache was the most common presenting feature (88%) followed by raised ESR (55%), raised CRP (53%), visual disturbance (44%), scalp tenderness (33%), jaw claudication (31%), PMR symptoms (27%) and temporal artery abnormalities (20%). Headache and raised CRP+/-ESR were the most sensitive markers (91% and 100%, respectively). They were, however, the least specific (4% and 36%). Temporal artery abnormality was the most specific finding (81%). ROC analysis revealed that the best-performing biomarkers were monocytes (area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.81) and platelets (AUC 0.80), which were superior to jaw claudication, the best-performing classical biomarker (AUC 0.68). Platelets above 450 x 109/L had a specificity of 96% with a likelihood ratio of 10.9. Monocytes above 0.45 x 106/L had sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 67%, respectively. Conclusion  GCA cannot be accurately predicted by any single feature. In this cohort, absence of headache with a normal CRP+/-ESR ruled out GCA. Platelets and monocytes performed better than all the classical parameters associated with GCA. Validation of these biomarkers in a larger cohort is now needed to ascertain cut-off points which may help to develop a more accurate method to predict cases of GCA. Disclosure  T. Somoskeoy: None. A. Bourn: None. S. Knights: None. B. Mulhearn: None.

scholarly journals Scalp ulceration: a rare manifestation of giant cell arteritis

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. e230795 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise McDonald ◽  
Gavin Baker ◽  
Olga Kerr
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Oral Prednisolone ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
Complete Healing ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Temporal Artery Biopsy ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Scalp Necrosis ◽  
Dose Oral

An 81-year-old woman presented with an enlarging, tender ulcer on her scalp over an 8-week period, attributing it to a prior graze with garden shears. C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were elevated at 87.7 mg/L and 112 mm/hour, respectively. Incisional biopsies demonstrated ulceration and full thickness necrosis with no evidence of malignancy. Vasculitis was suggested as a likely cause of such extensive necrosis and subsequent temporal artery biopsy findings were consistent with giant cell arteritis. The patient was initially treated with high-dose oral prednisolone and achieved complete healing of the scalp necrosis within 12 months, with a gradual down-titration of steroid therapy thereafter. Scalp necrosis is a rare, potentially life-threatening complication of giant cell arteritis. This case highlights the importance of considering scalp necrosis as a manifestation of giant cell arteritis when assessing scalp ulceration. Prompt diagnosis and treatment can prevent significant morbidity and potential mortality.

Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and follow-up of Giant Cell Arteritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona L Coath ◽  
Chetan Mukhtyar
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Doppler Ultrasonography ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Temporal Artery Biopsy ◽  
Examination Time

Abstract Colour-doppler ultrasonography is the first measure to allow objective bedside assessment of Giant Cell Arteritis (GCA). This paper discusses the evidence using the OMERACT filter. Consensus definitions for ultrasonography changes were agreed by Delphi process, with the ‘halo’ and ‘compression’ sign being characteristic. The ‘halo’ is sensitive to change, disappearing within 2-4 weeks of starting glucocorticoids. Ultrasonography has moderate convergent validity with temporal artery biopsy in a pooled analysis of 12 studies including 965 participants (k = 0.44, 95% CI 0.38-0.50). The interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities are good (k = 0.6, k = 0.76-0.78) in live exercises, and excellent when assessing acquired images and videos (k = 0.83-0.87, k = 0.88). Discriminant validity has been tested against stroke and diabetes mellitus (k=-0.16 for diabetes). Machine familiarity and adequate examination time improves feasibility. Ultrasonography in follow-up is not yet adequately defined. Some patients have persistent changes in the larger arteries but these do not necessarily imply treatment failure or predict relapses.

scholarly journals OP0150 WHAT IS THE ROLE OF TEMPORAL ARTERY BIOPSY IN GIANT CELL ARTERITIS FAST-TRACK PATHWAYS WHEN TEMPORAL ARTERY ULTRASOUND IS NEGATIVE?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 95.3-95
Author(s):  
A. Sachdev ◽  
S. Dubey ◽  
C. Tiivas ◽  
M. George ◽  
P. Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
Clinical Findings ◽  
Specimen Size ◽  
Temporal Artery Biopsy ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Relevant Role

Background:A number of centres are now running fast track pathways for diagnosis and management of Giant cell arteritis with ultrasound as the first port of call for diagnosis1. Temporal artery biopsies (TABs) have become the second line of investigation, and it is unclear how useful TAB is in this setting.Objectives:This study looked at accuracy of Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) in patients with suspected Giant Cell arteritis (GCA) with negative/inconclusive ultrasound (U/S) and how duration of treatment on steroids prior to these investigations and arterial specimen size affected it.Methods:Prospective study of all patients with suspected GCA referred for TAB when U/S was negative or inconclusive, as part of the local fast-track pathway (Coventry). Database included clinical findings, serological work up, U/S and TAB results and treatment. Sensitivity and specificity of U/S and TAB was calculated and compared based on duration of treatment with steroids.Results:One hundred and nine patients were referred for TAB via Coventry fast-track-pathway. The sensitivity of U/S in this cohort of patients was 9.08% and specificity was 93.33%. After 3 days of steroid this was 0% and 100% respectively. For TAB when done within 10 days of starting steroids, this was 65% and 87.5% respectively. After 20 days of steroids this was 0 % and 100%. The sensitivity and specificity was 20% and 85% when arterial specimen size was 11-15mm and 47% and 100% when specimen size was 16 mm or more. Sensitivity and specificity of U/S of 644 suspected GCA patients was 48% and 98%.Conclusion:Our study demonstrates that TAB plays a relevant role in GCA fast-track-pathways, when U/S is negative/inconclusive. TAB was more sensitive than U/S in this cohort of patients, but overall sensitivity of U/S was higher when calculated for all patients suspected with GCA. Both remain useful tests if performed early. TAB specimen size should ideally be 16mm or more and done within 10 days of starting steroids.References:[1]Jonathan Pinnell, Carl Tiivas, Kaushik Chaudhuri, Purnima Mehta, Shirish Dubey, O38 The diagnostic performance of ultrasound Doppler in a fast-track pathway for giant cell arteritis,Rheumatology, Volume 58, Issue Supplement_3, April 2019, kez105.036,https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kez105.036Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Evaluating the Usefulness and Timing of the Temporal Artery Biopsy for the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis

2011 ◽  
Vol 121 (S5) ◽  
pp. S264-S264
Author(s):  
Stephen V. Tornabene ◽  
Raymond Hilsinger ◽  
Raul M. Cruz
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
Temporal Artery Biopsy

The sensitivity of temporal artery biopsy in the detection of giant cell arteritis is independent of tissue length

2021 ◽  
Vol 156 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S28-S29
Author(s):  
H J Hurley ◽  
P Q Deb
Keyword(s):  
Giant Cell Arteritis ◽  
Giant Cell ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Temporal Artery ◽  
Temporal Artery Biopsy ◽  
Temporal Arteries ◽  
Biopsy Specimens ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Left And Right

Abstract Introduction/Objective Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis of the elderly, and the most common primary systemic vasculitis overall, with an annual incidence of 200/million. The long term sequelae, namely vision loss and stroke, are permanent and devastating. While GCA is often treated empirically based on clinical presentation, panarteritis on temporal artery biopsy is required for diagnosis. However, these biopsies have the tendency to be falsely negative due to skip lesions, a common feature of GCA. Therefore, we set out to determine whether longer biopsy specimens were more sensitive in the detection of GCA. Methods/Case Report A census of temporal artery biopsies performed with the indication of clinical symptoms of GCA was taken at our institution. The patient age, sex, biopsy laterality, biopsy length, and pathological diagnosis were recorded for each cataloged sample. Statistical significance of difference in biopsy length was tested using an unpaired t-test in R 4.1.0. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) A total of 114 temporal artery specimens were biopsied from 94 different patients with the indication of GCA and assigned a definitive positive or negative diagnosis. Of the 94 patients, 54 were female and 40 were male. Of the total pathological specimens, 11 were positive and 103 were negative. The overall average length of biopsy specimens was 2.13 cm with a standard deviation of 0.65 cm. The average positive biopsy was 2.26 cm long, and the average negative was 2.12 cm, an insignificant difference (0.14 cm, t = 0.7, p = 0.43). In 25 patients, biopsies were taken from both the left and right temporal arteries. Of those patients, 2 were positive for GCA and the remaining 23 were negative. Interestingly, the biopsy result in every case was identical between the left and right samples; we found no instances of pathological evidence of GCA in only one of the two samples from the same patient. Conclusion According to data taken at our institution, there is no indication to lengthen the biopsy requirements from the existing 1.5 cm. However, we have demonstrated evidence that it may be unnecessary to biopsy both temporal arteries in a single patient. Larger studies would be required to confirm our findings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document