scholarly journals Can visual aides influence rehabilitation and length of stay following knee replacement? A randomized controlled study

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Abson ◽  
Benjamin Kenny ◽  
Reza Rahim ◽  
Daniel Benz ◽  
Jorgen Hellman
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Visual Aids ◽  
Visual Aid ◽  
Patient Stay ◽  
American Society ◽  
Cohort Groups ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Arthroplasty is increasingly performed within Australia, with a 2.7% rate increase of total knee arthroplasty (TKR) over the last year. With an increasing burden on the public health system and increasing waiting lists, all efforts are being made to decrease length of stay and improve the post operative rehabilitation process. There is currently insufficient evidence to make a conclusive statement about visual aids and improved goal attainment post TKR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate one such visual aid clinical photographs of patients knee range of motion (ROM) pre- and post-operatively and their effect on length of stay. Photographs of knee range of motion were obtained pre and post-operatively while the patient was anesthetized. In this study, a randomized, single blinded design allocated patients to either be shown or not shown their photographs on day 1 post operatively. Primary outcome measures were the number of days the patient remained in hospital. Secondary measures were Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores, Oxford Knee Scores, American Society of Anesthesiologists Score and knee ROM. Thirty-two patients (3 exclusions) were randomized to the photo group and 27 patients (4 exclusions) were randomized to the no photo group. The median length of stay between groups was not significantly different. Currently there is not enough evidence to conclude that visual aids effect length of stay or rehabilitation pathways. Further assessment with larger cohort groups is needed. Preoperative targeting and rehabilitation for patients with lower functional status may shorten post operative length of patient stay in our institution.

Predictors of Successful Early Discharge for Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Octogenarians

2021 ◽  
pp. 155633162110306
Author(s):  
Andrew B. Kay ◽  
Danielle Y. Ponzio ◽  
Courtney D. Bell ◽  
Fabio Orozco ◽  
Zachary D. Post ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Total Hip ◽  
Hip And Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Student’S T ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Background: Decreased length of stay after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is becoming a more common way to contain healthcare costs and increase patient satisfaction. There is little evidence to support “early” discharge in elderly patients. Purpose: We sought to identify preoperative factors that correlated with early discharge (by postoperative day [POD] 1) in comparison to late discharge (after POD2) in octogenarians after TJA. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study from a single institution, we identified 482 patients ages 80 to 89 who underwent primary TJA from January 2014 to December 2017; 319 had total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and 163 had total hip arthroplasty (THA). Data collected included preoperative knee range of motion (ROM), demographics, and comorbidities; 90-day readmission and mortality rates were also evaluated. P values for continuous data were calculated using student’s t test and for categorical data using χ2 testing. Results: Of octogenarian patients, 30.9% were discharged by POD1. Early discharge was associated with being male, married, and nonsmoking, as well as having an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 2, independent preoperative ambulation, and a postoperative caregiver. Type of procedure (TKA vs THA), body mass index, laterality, preoperative range of motion (ROM) for TKA, and single vs multilevel home did not affect the probability of early discharge. Discharge on POD1 was not associated with increased 90-day readmission rates. There were no deaths. Conclusion: Early discharge for octogenarians can be successfully implemented in a select subset of patients without increasing 90-day readmission or death rates. There are multiple factors that predict successful early discharge.

scholarly journals Hartmann’s procedure, reversal and rate of stoma-free survival

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Hallam ◽  
BS Mothe ◽  
RMR Tirumulaju
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Major Complication ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Hartmann’S Procedure ◽  
Hartmann's Procedure ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Audit Period ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Background Hartmann’s procedure is a commonly performed operation for complicated left colon diverticulitis or malignancy. The timing for reversal of Hartmann’s is not well defined as it is technically challenging and carries a high complication rate. Methods This study is a retrospective audit of all patients who underwent Hartmann’s procedure between 2008 and 2014. Reversal of Hartmann’s rate, timing, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, length of stay and complications (Clavien–Dindo) including 30-day mortality were recorded. Results Hartmann’s procedure (n = 228) indications were complicated diverticular disease 44% (n = 100), malignancy 32% (n = 74) and other causes 24%, (n = 56). Reversal of Hartmann’s rate was 47% (n = 108). Median age of patients was 58 years (range 21–84 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade 2 (range 1–4), length of stay was eight days (range 2–42 days). Median time to reversal of Hartmann’s was 11 months (range 4–96 months). The overall complication rate from reversal of Hartmann’s was 21%; 3.7% had a major complication of IIIa or above including three anastomotic leaks and one deep wound dehiscence. Failure of reversal and permanent stoma was less than 1% (n = 2). Thirty-day mortality following Hartmann’s procedure was 7% (n = 15). Where Hartmann’s procedure wass not reversed, for 30% (n = 31) this was the patient’s choice and 70% (n = 74) were either high risk or unfit. Conclusions Hartmann’s procedure is reversed less frequently than thought and consented for. Only 46% of Hartmann’s procedures were stoma free at the end of the audit period. The anastomotic complication rate of 1% is also low for reversal of Hartmann’s procedure in this study.

scholarly journals Reliable and rapid smooth extubation after Ketofol for induction of general anesthesia in Laparoscopic Drilling of polycystic ovary: A randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atef Mohamed Sayed Mahmoud ◽  
Joseph Makram Botros ◽  
Safaa Gaber Ragab
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Polycystic Ovary ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Airway Response ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Background the outcome of ketofol on the hemodynamics and the airway response during induction of general anesthesia has been studied before. Its effect on smoothness of extubation has not been studied before. So, we aimed to assess the effect of ketofol on the smoothness of extubation and compare it with propofol only for induction of general anesthesia. Methods This double-blind, randomized, and controlled study was conducted on one hundred and six American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical status ''ASA PS'' class I and II female patients aged 18–40 years old and scheduled for laparoscopic drilling for polycystic ovary disease under general anesthesia. The patients were assigned into one of two groups (53) patients each; group KP = ketofol and group P = propofol. Results There was good sedation score during suction and extubation in the ketofol group. Airway response and smoothness of extubation were better in the ketofol group better than the propofol group. Conclusion Ketofol as an induction anesthetic agent was effective in attenuating the airway response during extubation more than profofol only. Trial registration: This trial was retrospectively registered at the Clinical Trial.gov with the Identification Number: NCT04365686.

scholarly journals Effect of Intravenous Dexamethasone on Propofol Injection Pain: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Muhammad Sazzad Hossain ◽  
Md Afzalur Rahman ◽  
Mamunur Rashid ◽  
Monirul Islam ◽  
Anisur Rahman Babu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Saline Group ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Injection Pain ◽  
Moderate Pain ◽  
Dexamethasone Group ◽  
Group I ◽  
Elective Surgical Procedure ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Background and aim of study: Pain on propofol injection (POPI) is a common problem. None of the commonly used methods completely attenuate the pain. Inflammatory response to propofol contributes to the pain. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of dexamethasone in attenuation of pain following intravenous injection of propofol. Materials and methods: A total of 80 adult patients were scheduled in this study with either sex, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) grade I and II, for routine elective surgical procedure under general anesthesia. The patients enrolled were divided randomly into two groups of 40 patients each. Group I received 0.15 mg/kg of intravenous dexamethasone in 5 ml normal saline and Group II (placebo group) received 5 ml of 0.9% intravenous normal saline, following exsanguination and occlusion of the vein of the arm. This was followed by 0.5 mg/kg of propofol intravenously.The patients were asked to report their pain during injection of propofol according to the McCririck and Hunter scale. Results: The incidence of pain experienced in dexamethasone group was 45% patients and in saline group was 70% patients (p<0.05). The severity of POPI was also lower in dexamethasone group than the saline group (p<0.05). The incidence of mild and moderate pain in dexamethasone groups versus saline group was 30% versus 45% and 15% versus 25% respectively p<0.05. There was no severe pain recorded in any groups. Conclusion: Pretreatment with intravenous dexamethasone (0.15 mg/kg) before injection of propofol is effective and safe in reducing the incidence and severity of pain on propofol injection (POPI). Bangladesh J Otorhinolaryngol; April 2019; 25(1): 28-33

Reasons for 30-day Postoperative Readmissions for Medicare Patients at a Community-based Teaching Hospital

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 381-386
Author(s):  
Jennifer L. Kirsch ◽  
Shanu N. Kothari ◽  
Janelle M. Ausloos ◽  
Jacob D. Gundrum ◽  
Kara J. Kallies
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Reform Initiatives ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Medicare Patients ◽  
Patient Noncompliance ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Healthcare reform initiatives have proposed reducing reimbursement for certain 30-day readmissions among Medicare patients. Our objective was to evaluate the incidence and reasons for 30-day postoperative readmissions at our institution. The medical records of Medicare patients who underwent surgery from January 1, 2010, through May 16, 2011, were reviewed. Statistical analysis included χ2, Wilcoxon rank sum, and t tests. Two thousand eight hundred sixty-five patients were included; 199 (7%) had a 30-day readmission. The readmission group included a higher proportion of men (53.8 vs 43.6%, P = 0.005), and patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 3 or greater (84 vs 66%, P < 0.001) versus the nonreadmission group. Mean index length of stay and operative time were longer in the readmitted versus nonreadmitted group (4.8 vs 2.8 days, P < 0.001; 122.8 vs 98.2 minutes, P < 0.001). Readmission reasons were surgically related (53%), surgically unrelated (35%), planned (7%), and patient-related (5%). Higher 30-day postoperative readmission rates were associated with male sex, higher ASA class, and longer index length of stay and operative time. Reasons for readmission included surgical- and patient-related factors. Decreased reimbursement should be discouraged for readmissions directly related to patient noncompliance.

scholarly journals Multi- and univariate analyses of the weekend effect for elective lower-limb joint replacements

2018 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
WTE Briggs ◽  
BLT Guevel ◽  
AW McCaskie ◽  
SM McDonnell
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Joint Replacement ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Weekend Effect ◽  
Joint Replacements ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Postoperative Length ◽  
Day Of The Week ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists

Introduction The weekend effect is a perceived difference in outcome between medical care provided at the weekend when compared to that of a weekday. Clearly multifactorial, this effect remains incompletely understood and variable in different clinical contexts. In this study we analyse factors relevant to the weekend effect in elective lower-limb joint replacement at a large NHS multispecialty academic healthcare centre. Materials and Methods We reviewed the electronic medical records of 352 consecutive patients who received an elective primary hip or knee arthroplasty. Patient, clinical and time-related variables were extracted from the records. The data were anonymised, then processed using a combination of uni- and multivariate statistics. Results There is a significant association between the selected weekend effect outcome measure (postoperative length of stay) and patient age, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, time to first postoperative physiotherapy and time to postoperative radiography but not day of the week of operation. Discussion We were not able to demonstrate a weekend effect in elective lower-limb joint replacement at our institution nor identify a factor that would require additional weekend clinical medical staffing. Rather, resource priorities would seem to include measures to optimise at-risk patients preoperatively and measures to reduce time to physiotherapy and radiography postoperatively. Conclusions Our findings imply that postoperative length of stay could be minimised by strategies relating to patient selection and access to postoperative services. We have also identified a powerful statistical methodology that could be applied to other service evaluations in different clinical contexts.

scholarly journals A Comparison of Ondansetron and Lidocaine in Reducing Injection Pain of Propofol: A Randomized Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wirat Wasinwong ◽  
Sarocha Termthong ◽  
Prae Plansangkate ◽  
Jutarat Tanasansuttiporn ◽  
Riam Kosem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Injection Pain ◽  
Syringe Pump ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Median Pain

Abstract Background Propofol injection pain is common. Previous studies found that ondansetron can also block sodium channels. Objective The primary outcome was the efficacy of ondansetron compared to lidocaine and placebo for the reduction of propofol injection pain. Method This trial was conducted in 240 patients, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification I-III and aged between 18-65 years old, undergoing elective surgery, and having a 20-gauge intravenous catheter at the hand dorsum. Each group of 80 patients received 8 mg of ondansetron in the O Group, 40 mg of lidocaine in the L Group and normal saline in the C Group. The study medications were blindly given then 1 minute later, the propofol was administered via the syringe pump at the rate of 600 ml/hr. for 30 seconds. Thereafter, the syringe pump of propofol was temporarily paused, and the patients were asked to rate his/her pain. Result The incidence of pain was lowest in the L group (66.2%) compared with the O (82.5%) and the C groups (85.0%) (P<0.01). The median pain score in the L, O, and C groups were 2 (0-4), 4 (2-5), and 4.5 (2-6), respectively (P<0.01). The incidences of no pain, mild, moderate, and severe pain were also significantly different in the L group (33.8%, 37.5%, 21.2%, and 7.5%, respectively) compared with those in the O group (17.5%, 31.2%, 31.2%, and 20.0%, respectively) and the C groups (15.0%, 22.5%, 40.0%, and 22.5%, respectively) (P<0.01).. Conclusion Pretreatment with intravenous lidocaine, rather than ondansetron, can reduce the incidence and intensity of propofol-induced pain.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON DOSE REQUIREMENT OF PROPOFOL AND THIOPENTONE INDUCTION IN PATIENTS UNDER GENERAL ENDOTRACHEAL ANESTHESIA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 262
Author(s):  
Laxman K Senapati ◽  
Priyadarsini Samanta
Keyword(s):  
Saline Infusion ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Dose Requirement ◽  
Preanesthetic Medication ◽  
American Society ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Dexmedetomidine Infusion ◽  
Endotracheal Anesthesia

Objectives: The present study was undertaken to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine as a premedicant on dose requirement of induction agents, thiopentone and propofol in patients undergoing various surgeries under general endotracheal anesthesia under the bispectral index (BIS) guidance.Methods: A double-blinded randomized controlled study was conducted during the year 2014–2015 among 120 patients aged 18–55 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists’ physical status Score I or II and Mallampati Grades I and II. After obtaining informed consent, all the eligible patients were randomly assigned to one of the four groups each containing 30 patients: Group SP (control group) - saline infusion before induction with propofol, group DP - dexmedetomidine infusion before induction with propofol, group ST (control group) - saline infusion before induction with thiopentone, and group DT - dexmedetomidine infusion before induction with thiopentone.Results: The mean dose of propofol required was 95.0±6.15 mg and 55.0±7.0 mg in group SP and DP, respectively, whereas the requirement of thiopentone was 6.6±0.93 mg/kg in group ST as opposed to 4.8±0.58 mg/kg in group DT. The decrease in the dose requirement in dexmedetomidine groups than the control groups was statistically significant and also dose reduction in dexmedetomidine was more in DP group compared to that in DT group (p<0.001).Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine as a preanesthetic medication significantly decreases intraoperative anesthetic requirement of thiopentone and propofol, and dose requirement is significantly less in case of propofol as compared to thiopentone.

The Relationship Between Preoperative Physical Activity With American Society of Anesthesiologists Score and Postoperative Length of Stay in Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Efthymios Papadopoulos ◽  
Priya Brahmbhatt ◽  
Shabbir M.H. Alibhai ◽  
George A. Tomlinson ◽  
Andrew G. Matthew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
The Relationship

Background: The relationship between preoperative physical activity (PA) and hospital length of stay (LOS) following radical prostatectomy (RP) is poorly understood. In addition, the relationship between PA and the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status score (ASA PS), an established prognosticator of surgical risk, has not been studied. The authors assessed the relationship between leisure-time PA (LTPA), ASA PS, and LOS in individuals undergoing RP. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from an institutional database. Ordinal logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between preoperative LTPA and physical status as indicated by the ASA PS. Binary logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between preoperative LTPA and LOS. Results: A sample of 1064 participants were included in the analyses. The participants in the highest preoperative LTPA quartile had 45% reduced odds (P = .015) of a worse ASA PS classification compared with participants in the lowest quartile. The participants engaging in vigorous LTPA preoperatively had 35% lower odds (P = .014) of a >2-day LOS following RP compared with participants who were not engaging in preoperative vigorous LTPA. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that total and vigorous preoperative LTPA is associated with improved preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists scores and LOS following RP, respectively.

Validation of a Risk Stratification Index and Risk Quantification Index for Predicting Patient Outcomes

2013 ◽  
Vol 119 (3) ◽  
pp. 525-540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. G. Sigakis ◽  
Edward A. Bittner ◽  
Jonathan P. Wanderer
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Risk Quantification ◽  
American Society ◽  
American Society Of Anesthesiologists ◽  
Procedure Codes ◽  
Receiver Operating

Abstract Background: External validation of published risk stratification models is essential to determine their generalizability. This study evaluates the performance of the Risk Stratification Indices (RSIs) and 30-day mortality Risk Quantification Index (RQI). Methods: 108,423 adult hospital admissions with anesthetics were identified (2006–2011). RSIs for mortality and length-of-stay endpoints were calculated using published methodology. 91,128 adult, noncardiac inpatient surgeries were identified with administrative data required for RQI calculation. Results: RSI in-hospital mortality and RQI 30-day mortality Brier scores were 0.308 and 0.017, respectively. RSI discrimination, by area under the receiver operating curves, was excellent at 0.966 (95% CI, 0.963–0.970) for in-hospital mortality, 0.903 (0.896–0.909) for 30-day mortality, 0.866 (0.861–0.870) for 1-yr mortality, and 0.884 (0.882–0.886) for length-of-stay. RSI calibration, however, was poor overall (17% predicted in-hospital mortality vs. 1.5% observed after inclusion of the regression constant) as demonstrated by calibration plots. Removal of self-fulfilling diagnosis and procedure codes (20,001 of 108,423; 20%) yielded similar results. RQIs were calculated for only 62,640 of 91,128 patients (68.7%) due to unmatched procedure codes. Patients with unmatched codes were younger, had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and 30-day mortality. The area under the receiver operating curve for 30-day mortality RQI was 0.888 (0.879–0.897). The model also demonstrated good calibration. Performance of a restricted index, Procedure Severity Score + American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, performed as well as the original RQI model (age + American Society of Anesthesiologists + Procedure Severity Score). Conclusion: Although the RSIs demonstrated excellent discrimination, poor calibration limits their generalizability. The 30-day mortality RQI performed well with age providing a limited contribution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document