scholarly journals The prognostic value of tip-to-apex distance (TAD index) in intertrochanteric fractures fixed by dynamic hip screw

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Sadighi ◽  
Jafar Ganjpour Sales ◽  
Sahar Alavi
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Wide Acceptance ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Screw Position ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
The Many ◽  
Type Of Fracture

Intertrochanteric fractures (ITFs) are the most common type of fractures requiring surgical intervention. They also have the highest surgical mortality among orthopedic operations. Among the many different techniques used for fixation of this type of fracture, use of the Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) has gained wide acceptance. This current study was designed to assess positive predictive value of tip-to-apex distance (TAD) index in the prognosis of patients treated with DHS. The study was designed according to a descriptive-analytic protocol, made up of 100 cases of ITFs caused by falling, treated in the Shohada Orthopedic Center, Tabriz, Iran. All patients underwent lateral and antero-posterior hip X-ray to measure TAD index. The cohort was followed for three months after DHS placement. Of a total of 100 cases (53 male, 47 female) with a mean age of 76.7 years (range 29-100 years), 43% had grade 4, 29% grade 3, 21% grade 5, 5% grade 2 and 2% grade 6 osteoporosis. The screw position was postero-inferior in 57%, central in 40% and superior in 3% of patients. Minimum and maximum TAD index were 20 and 28 mm, respectively. Mean TAD was 23.5 mm. There were no post-operative complications in 84% of cases. Screw failure was the most common complication in the remaining 16% of patients. The study shows a statistically significant correlation between TAD index and cut-off rate in patients with intertrochanteric fractures of femoral bone treated by DHS. This validates the use of TAD index in determining the prognosis of patients treated by DHS.

scholarly journals Increased Fracture Collapse after Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated by the Dynamic Hip Screw Adversely Affects Walking Ability but Not Survival

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Fang ◽  
Paata Gudushauri ◽  
Tak-Man Wong ◽  
Tak-Wing Lau ◽  
Terence Pun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Data ◽  
Dynamic Contact ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Screw Position ◽  
Hip Screw

In osteoporotic hip fractures, fracture collapse is deliberately allowed by commonly used implants to improve dynamic contact and healing. The muscle lever arm is, however, compromised by shortening. We evaluated a cohort of 361 patients with AO/OTA 31.A1 or 31.A2 intertrochanteric fracture treated by the dynamic hip screw (DHS) who had a minimal follow-up of 3 months and an average follow-up of 14.6 months and long term survival data. The amount of fracture collapse and shortening due to sliding of the DHS was determined at the latest follow-up and graded as minimal (<1 cm), moderate (1-2 cm), or severe (>2 cm). With increased severity of collapse, more patients were unable to maintain their premorbid walking function (minimal collapse = 34.2%, moderate = 33.3%, severe = 62.8%, andp=0.028). Based on ordinal regression of risk factors, increased fracture collapse was significantly and independently related to increasing age (p=0.037), female sex (p=0.024), A2 fracture class (p=0.010), increased operative duration (p=0.011), poor reduction quality (p=0.000), and suboptimal tip-apex distance of >25 mm (p=0.050). Patients who had better outcome in terms of walking function were independently predicted by younger age (p=0.036), higher MMSE marks (p=0.000), higher MBI marks (p=0.010), better premorbid walking status (p=0.000), less fracture collapse (p=0.011), and optimal lag screw position in centre-centre or centre-inferior position (p=0.020). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, fracture collapse had no association with mortality from 2.4 to 7.6 years after surgery. In conclusion, increased fracture collapse after fixation of geriatric intertrochanteric fractures adversely affected walking but not survival.

scholarly journals Lag screw cutout in intertrochanteric fractures fixed with DHS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (09) ◽  
pp. 1862-1866
Author(s):  
Muhammad Nasir Ali ◽  
Muhammad Khalid Chishti ◽  
Kashif Siddiq ◽  
Muhammad Hamayun Hameed ◽  
Muhammad Tayyab Waheed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Middle Position ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Screw Position ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Study Setting

Objectives: To determine the failure of DHS (dynamic hip screw) in terms of lag screw cutout. Study Design: Hospital Based Cross Sectional study. Setting: BVH and Civil Hospital Bahawalpur. Period: From 2013 to 2018. Material & Methods: 273 patients of both genders with age more than 50 years having stable intertrochanteric fractures were included in this study. With the help of C arm, the best possible anatomical reduction and rigid internal fixation was done with 135 degree DHS. Lag screw position and TAD determined on first postoperative day on radiographs (Anteroposterior & Lateral). Failure of fixation was determined on the radiographs during follow up. Lag screw cut-out was the projection of the screw from the femoral head by more than 1mm. Results: The mean age of the patients was 68.6 years (50-88). There were 132 (51.1 %) males and 126 (48.8%) females. Overall lag screw cutout rate was 11.2%. 21(30.8%) had screw cutout while 47 (69.1%) healed successfully among 68 patients with TAD ≥ 25mm. On the other hand 8(4.2%) had screw cutout while 182 (95.7%) healed successfully among 190 patients with TAD < 25mm. Middle middle and inferior middle position had highest success rate (˃ 92%) while inferior posterior position had highest cutout rate (36.2%). Among different age categories high failure rate (17.8%) seen in patients more than 70 years. Conclusion: The incidence of lag screw cutout is 11.2 % and risk of cutout can be minimized by placing lag screw in middle middle or inferior middle position and keeping the TAD < 25mm. More attention during follow up should be paid to patients with age ˃ 70 years.

scholarly journals A study to assess proximal femoral nailing versus dynamic hip screw device in surgical management of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
E. S. Radhe Shyam ◽  
K. Ashwin
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Trochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Technical Failure ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Hip Screw

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The incidence of inter trochanteric fracture is expected to have doubled by 2040. Inter trochanteric fractures account for about 45% to 50% of all hip fractures in the elderly populationand out of these, near about 50% to 60% are classified as unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure. This study as performed<strong> </strong>to assess functional outcome with dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail in intertrochanteric fracture management.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> It was prospective observational study done for a period of 1year from January 2016-January 2017 among patients who attended OPD or emergency department with intertrochanteric fracture. Two different implants were used dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Excellent results in functional outcome was more in case of PFN (66.6%) compared to DHS (50%). The type of trauma in DHS group was road traffic accident in 38.8%, domestic fall in 50% and others such as assault was in 11.1% while in PFN group intertrochanteric fracture was seen in 61.1% due to domestic fall.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The functional outcome was more better with proximal femoral nail (PFN) compared to dynamic hip screw (DHS). Therefore, proximal femoral nail (PFN) should be preferred for management of intertrochanteric fractures.</p>

scholarly journals Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur by Minimally Invasive Dynamic Hip Screw

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
Dayanand M ◽  
◽  
Deepak S ◽  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Hip Screw

Dynamic Hip Screw versus Proximal Femoral Nail in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures - A Retrospective Analysis from Rajasthan

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (26) ◽  
pp. 2271-2277
Author(s):  
Gajanand Shriram Dhaked ◽  
Abhishek Komalsingh Jaroli ◽  
Khushboo Parmanand Malav ◽  
Harish Narayan Singh Rajpurohit
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Hip Screw

BACKGROUND Current management of Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures has evolved with the introduction of dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN). The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between the DHS and PFN for IT fracture fixation. METHODS This study is a retrospective comparative analysis of 455 patients with IT fractures; DHS (292) and PFN (163), who were treated from June 2012 to June 2015. The patients were reviewed postoperatively for a minimum of 12 months to evaluate functional outcome using Salvati-Wilson score. Categorical data was present as absolute number or percentages, and parametric variables were presented as Mean ± SD, while non parametric data were presented as median. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS Intramedullary nails offer no advantage over extramedullary devices to treat IT fractures caused by low-energy trauma (AO 31 - A1). However, clinically significant outcomes were established for PFN group in terms of duration of surgery, x- ray exposure and SW Score for AO / OTA 31 - A2 and 31 - A3. Reoperations encountered for local pain due to implant prominence were significantly higher in the PFN group (4.90 % versus 1.02 %). Kaplan Meier survival probability of 69.3 % and 79.5 % predicted for DHS and PFN respectively, 3 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Our conclusion reinforces indication for PFN in unstable IT fractures (31 - A2 and 31 - A3), owing to its better functional outcome and biomechanical properties. Functional outcomes for stable IT fracture (AO 31 - A1) were comparable between DHS and PFN, therefore final decision for implant choice depends on implant cost, surgeon’s preference for specific technique. However, understanding the morphology of proximal femur, peritrochanteric region is crucial to analyse the anatomical variations in Indian population which will provide the basis for intramedullary nail design modifications. KEYWORDS Intertrochanteric Fractures, DHS Fixation, PFN Fixation

scholarly journals Dynamic Hip Screw with Trochanter-Stabilizing Plate Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation as a Treatment for Unstable AO/OTA 31-A2 and 31-A3 Intertrochanteric Fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Chun-Wei Fu ◽  
Ji-Ying Chen ◽  
Yueh-Ching Liu ◽  
Kuang-Wen Liao ◽  
Yung-Chang Lu
Keyword(s):  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Residual Pain ◽  
Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation ◽  
Im Nailing

Background. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) with the addition of an angular stable trochanter-stabilizing plate (TSP) has been considered the ideal treatment for the unstable intertrochanteric fracture type. However, there have been few comparisons between DHS+TSP augmentation with intramedullary (IM) nailing. The aim of this retrospectively registered study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with the unstable type of intertrochanteric fractures treated with DHS+TSP or IM nailing (proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)). Methods. From June 2013 to April 2018, 358 patients with proximal femur fracture AO/OTA type 31A2 and 31A3 treated with PFNA or DHS+TSP and followed for ≥10 months postoperatively were included. The surgical-dependent outcome evaluation included the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, and blood transfusion amount. Functional status was also measured. Radiographic findings and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Result. The operation time was significantly shorter in the DHS+TSP group than that in the PFNA group for both A2 and A3 fractures (A2 type: 84.0 vs.96.4 min; p<0.05; A3 type: 102.4 vs.116.1 min; p<0.05). Postoperative decrease in hemoglobin was more significant in the PFNA group than that in the DHS+TSP group for both fracture types (A2 type: −1.88 vs. −1.29 (mg/dL); p<0.05; A3 type: −1.63 vs. −1.04 (mg/dL); p<0.05). However, the patients treated with DHS+TSP had significantly more residual pain than those treated with PFNA during the final follow-up (Visual Analog Scale score, A2 type: 28.4 vs.23.2; p<0.05; A3 type: 27.5 vs.23.6; p<0.05) and complained of greater implant irritation. Conclusion. We found that DHS+TSP was associated with less operation time and less postoperative decrease in hemoglobin but more residual pain and implant irritation than those of PFNA. As a treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fracture, DHS+TSP provided ideal surgical outcomes which were not inferior to the PFNA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document