scholarly journals Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation as first-line treatment in myeloma: a global perspective of current concepts and future possibilities

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catriona Elizabeth Mactier ◽  
Md Serajul Islam

Stem cell transplantation forms an integral part of the treatment for multiple myeloma. This paper reviews the current role of transplantation and the progress that has been made in order to optimize the success of this therapy. Effective induction chemotherapy is important and a combination regimen incorporating the novel agent bortezomib is now favorable. Adequate induction is a crucial adjunct to stem cell transplantation and in some cases may potentially postpone the need for transplant. Different conditioning agents prior to transplantation have been explored: high-dose melphalan is most commonly used and bortezomib is a promising additional agent. There is no well-defined superior transplantation protocol but single or tandem autologous stem cell transplantations are those most commonly used, with allogeneic transplantation only used in clinical trials. The appropriate timing of transplantation in the treatment plan is a matter of debate. Consolidation and maintenance chemotherapies, particularly thalidomide and bortezomib, aim to improve and prolong disease response to transplantation and delay recurrence. Prognostic factors for the outcome of stem cell transplant in myeloma have been highlighted. Despite good responses to chemotherapy and transplantation, the problem of disease recurrence persists. Thus, there is still much room for improvement. Treatments which harness the graft-<em>versus</em>-myeloma effect may offer a potential <em>cure</em> for this disease. Trials of novel agents are underway, including targeted therapies for specific antigens such as vaccines and monoclonal antibodies.

2012 ◽  
pp. e14
Author(s):  
Catriona Elizabeth Mactier ◽  
Md Serajul Islam

Stem cell transplantation forms an integral part of the treatment for multiple myeloma. This paper reviews the current role of transplantation and the progress that has been made in order to optimize the success of this therapy. Effective induction chemotherapy is important and a combination regimen incorporating the novel agent bortezomib is now favorable. Adequate induction is a crucial adjunct to stem cell transplantation and in some cases may potentially postpone the need for transplant. Different conditioning agents prior to transplantation have been explored: high-dose melphalan is most commonly used and bortezomib is a promising additional agent. There is no well-defined superior transplantation protocol but single or tandem autologous stem cell transplantations are those most commonly used, with allogeneic transplantation only used in clinical trials. The appropriate timing of transplantation in the treatment plan is a matter of debate. Consolidation and maintenance chemotherapies, particularly thalidomide and bortezomib, aim to improve and prolong disease response to transplantation and delay recurrence. Prognostic factors for the outcome of stem cell transplant in myeloma have been highlighted. Despite good responses to chemotherapy and transplantation, the problem of disease recurrence persists. Thus, there is still much room for improvement. Treatments which harness the graft-versus-myeloma effect may offer a potential cure for this disease. Trials of novel agents are underway, including targeted therapies for specific antigens such as vaccines and monoclonal antibodies.


ISRN Oncology ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nida Iqbal ◽  
Lalit Kumar ◽  
Naveed Iqbal

Despite a high clinical success, relapse in Hodgkin lymphoma occurs in 10–30% of cases and 5–10% patients are nonresponsive to initial chemotherapy. The standard management of these patients includes high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant. However, 50% of patients ultimately relapse after autotransplant which poses a big challenge. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation offers the only chance of cure in these patients. For patients who are not candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, achieving cure with other possible options is highly unlikely, and thus the treatment plan becomes noncurative. Various novel agents have shown promising results but the duration of response is short lived. A standard approach to deliver the most effective treatment for these patients is still lacking. This review focuses on the treatment options currently available for relapsed and refractory disease after autotransplant.


2020 ◽  
Vol 106 (6) ◽  
pp. NP5-NP8
Author(s):  
Matteo Carella ◽  
Vittorio Stefoni ◽  
Cinzia Pellegrini ◽  
Lisa Argnani ◽  
Michele Cavo ◽  
...  

Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is characterized by frequent relapses and need for multitude lines of therapy, which includes different immunochemotherapy regimens, novel monoclonal antibodies, novel drugs, and autologous or allogenic stem cell transplant. Early use of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) improves prognosis in patients with FL who may be candidates for an aggressive approach. Case presentation: We report the case of a 49-year-old woman with thrombophilia with relapsed/refractory grade 3A FL, heavily pretreated, who achieved third complete remission after high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT, despite experiencing life-threatening adverse events during her treatment history. Conclusions: Stem cell transplantation has emerged as the standard of care for young patients with FL but may be effective also in complex and multirelapsed clinical cases.


Author(s):  
Drew Provan ◽  
Trevor Baglin ◽  
Inderjeet Dokal ◽  
Johannes de Vos ◽  
Hassan Al-Sader

Haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) - Indications for haemopoietic SCT - Allogeneic SCT - Autologous STC - Investigations for BMT/PBSCT - Pretransplant investigation of donors - Bone marrow harvesting - Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and harvesting - Microbiological screening for stem cell cryopreservation - Stem cell transplant conditioning regimens - Infusion of cryopreserved stem cells - Infusion of fresh non-cryopreserved stem cells - Blood product support for SCT - Graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis - Acute GvHD - Chronic GvHD - Veno-occlusive disease (syn. sinusoidal obstruction syndrome) - Invasive fungal infections and antifungal therapy - CMV prophylaxis and treatment - Post-transplant vaccination programme and foreign travel - Longer term effect post-transplant - Treatment of relapse post-allogeneic SCT - Discharge and follow-up


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3343-3343
Author(s):  
Rudolf Trenschel ◽  
Markus Ditschkowski ◽  
Ahmet Elmaagacli ◽  
Nina K. Steckel ◽  
Michal Hlinka ◽  
...  

Abstract Treosulfan (TREO), a water-soluble bifunctional alkylating agent, has demonstrated strong immunosuppressive and antileukemic activity as well as profound stem cell toxicity in animal studies. Due to the advantageous clinical toxicity profile lacking significant non-hematologic organ toxicities, high-dose TREO in combination with cyclophosphamide (CY) has recently been evaluated in patients (pts) with an increased risk for organ toxicities precluding standard myeloablative conditioning regimens before allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Between 8/00 and 10/03, we treated 52 patients (pts) not eligible for conventional therapy with TREO in order to reduce toxicity in a myeloablative setting. Diagnoses were AML (n=14), ALL (n=11), MM (n=8), NHL (n=7), MDS (n=5), CML (n=4) and aplastic syndromes (n=3). 18 patients were grafted in early disease (1st or 2nd complete remission, chronic phase, or incipient first relapse (BM blasts < 10%). The remaining pts were classified as having advanced disease. Donors were identical siblings (n=24), non-identical family members (n=l), matched unrelated (n=14) or mismatched unrelated (n=13) donors. Conditioning regimen consisted of TREO 36g/qm (n=19) or 42g/qm (n=28) and CY 120mg/kg BW, 5 pts received TREO 42g/qm and fludarabine 150mg/qm. GvHD prophylaxis consisted of CSA alone (n=l) or in combination with short course MTX (n=25), alemtuzumab (n=22) or ATG (n=4). ANC > 500/μl and platelets > 20000/μl were reached at day 15 and 16 respectively. Acute GvHD grade II - IV occurred in 31% of pts and chronic GvHD in 60% of pts. Overall (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) were closely related to disease status. OS and DFS was 93% and 82,9% after a median of 18 months (range 0,9–38,5 months) for pts with early disease. In advanced disease the OS was 57,4% and the DFS 47,9% after a median of 4,8 months (range 0,3 – 22,9 months), respectively. In early disease, a single patient died of invasive aspergillosis associated with grade IV aGvHD. Another patient developed a relapse of CML which was successfully treated with DLI. Clinical relevant adverse events occurred in patients with advanced disease: MOF (n=7), VOD (n=2), infectious problems associated to GvHD grades II – IV (n=4), and pulmonary embolism (n=l). TREO as part of a myeloablative regimen seems to be effective and safe even in pts not eligible for conventional myeloablative therapy.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1419-1419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Hübel ◽  
Olaf Weingart ◽  
Frauke Naumann ◽  
Julia Bohlius ◽  
Keith Wheatley ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1419 Poster Board I-442 For more than 20 years high dose chemotherapy followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) has been considered as a reasonable approach for the treatment of patients with AML. Moreover, during the last decade new scientific and technical developments results in major changes of clinical practice of transplantation. Enhanced donor availabilities and new strategies, e.g. dose-reduced conditioning, now make allogeneic stem cell transplantation available to patients who do not have a related donor or would not tolerate high-dose chemotherapy due to age or comorbidities. Usually, the decision to start the work-up process for allogeneic transplantation in AML patients is based on the availability of a donor, the assignment to the cytogenetic risk group, and the response to induction therapy, as well as patient factors. However, there would be greater confidence in defining who should, or should not, receive an allograft if the available recommendations given in guidelines are consistent and similar. In this analysis, a comprehensive systematic literature search for best available evidence from controlled clinical trials was performed in the bibliographic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central. In addition, the websites of major organizations in Europe and the US (European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, EBMT; European Society for Medical Oncology, ESMO; British Committee for Standards in Hematology, BCSH; American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, ASBMT; National Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN) were screened and the specific databases of the National Guideline Clearinghouse and the Guideline International Network Database were also searched to identify the latest recommendations and guidelines. The following points were selected for systematic comparison of the best available evidence: Factors for risk assessment and categorization of AML, donor categories for allogeneic SCT (sibling donors / matched unrelated donors), allogeneic transplantation in first CR, allogeneic transplantation in relapse/progressive disease or second CR, and allogeneic transplants with reduced intensity conditioning regimen. Several interesting findings emerge from this analysis: 1) For patients with relapse or refractory disease donor availability should be explored and discussed, though this is not based on reliable evidence from randomized studies; 2) Patients in CR1 with intermediate or high risk disease who have a matched related donor available should receive allogeneic stem cell transplantation (intermediate risk; ASBMT: reasonable, NCCN: option); 3) For patients who lack a family donor the recommendations are not consistent; 4) Allogeneic transplantation with reduced conditioning in AML patients is feasible, but the superiority over standard therapeutic regimens has not been proven yet. In summary, current guidelines differ in critical points in the recommendation for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Furthermore, it is likely that only well-defined subgroups of AML patients will benefit from stem cell transplantation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


The Lancet ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 355 (9209) ◽  
pp. 1071-1072 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Gabarre ◽  
Nabih Azar ◽  
Brigitte Autran ◽  
Christine Katlama ◽  
Véronique Leblond

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document