scholarly journals Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy: what is the best treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer?

2011 ◽  
pp. 185-189
Author(s):  
Nabil Ismaili ◽  
Sanaa Elmajjaoui ◽  
Youssef Bensouda ◽  
Rhizlane Belbaraka ◽  
Halima Abahssain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Common Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer for men and the eighth most common cancer for women. Transitional cell carcinoma is the most predominant histological type. Bladder cancer is highly chemosensitive. In metastatic setting the treatment is based on cisplatin chemotherapy regimens type MVAC, MVAC-HD or gemcitabine plus cisplatin. The standard treatment of muscle invasive operable bladder cancer (T2–T4) used widely was radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph nodes dissection; the anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy has not accurately been defined so far. However, in the last decade, the treatment of tumors was improved by the introduction of chemotherapy as part of the management of the disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered at first, as standard treatment of choice, before local treatment for patients with good performance status (0–1) and good renal function–glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >60 mL/min. For patients treated with primary surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy is a valuable option in the case of lymph nodes involvement. This brief review would provide the evidence of the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of operable muscle invasive (T2–T4) bladder cancer.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy: what is the best treatment of muscle invasive bladder cancer?

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 185
Author(s):  
Nabil Ismaili ◽  
Sanaa Elmajjaoui ◽  
Youssef Bensouda ◽  
Rhizlane Belbaraka ◽  
Halima Abahssain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Common Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer for men and the eighth most common cancer for women. Transitional cell carcinoma is the most predominant histological type. Bladder cancer is highly chemosensitive. In metastatic setting the treatment is based on cisplatin chemotherapy regimens type MVAC, MVAC-HD or gemcitabine plus cisplatin. The standard treatment of muscle invasive operable bladder cancer (T2–T4) used widely was radical cystectomy with pelvic lymph nodes dissection; the anatomical extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy has not accurately been defined so far. However, in the last decade, the treatment of tumors was improved by the introduction of chemotherapy as part of the management of the disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be considered at first, as standard treatment of choice, before local treatment for patients with good performance status (0–1) and good renal function–glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >60 mL/min. For patients treated with primary surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy is a valuable option in the case of lymph nodes involvement. This brief review would provide the evidence of the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of operable muscle invasive (T2–T4) bladder cancer.

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with adverse pathology after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 367-367
Author(s):  
William P. Parker ◽  
Elizabeth B. Habermann ◽  
Courtney N. Day ◽  
Harras B. Zaid ◽  
Igor Frank ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Pathologic Stage ◽  
Muscle Invasive

367 Background: While neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle−invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is recognized as the standard of care, the management of patients with locally advanced and/or nodal disease after NAC and radical cystectomy (RC) is not well defined. We sought to evaluate the association of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and overall survival (OS) among patients with adverse pathology after NAC and RC. Methods: The National Cancer Database was reviewed to identify patients with adverse pathology (pT3N0, pT4N0, or pTanyN1−3) at RC following NAC from 2006−2012. Patients were stratified by receipt of AC. Clinical and pathologic variables were abstracted. OS was the primary end−point and differences on the basis of AC were assessed by the Kaplan−Meier method and log−rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association of AC with OS controlling for age, sex, race, Charlson score, year of diagnosis, pathologic stage, and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy. Results: Adverse pathology following NAC and RC was identified in 1,361 patients from 2006−2012, of whom 328 (24.1%) received AC. Staging was pT3N0 in 444 (32.6%), pT4N0 in 162 (11.9%), and pTanyN1−3 in 755 (55.5%). Median OS for the entire cohort was 22.9 months, which differed by pathologic stage: 34.6 months (pT3N0), 21.4 months (pT4N0), and 19.3 months (pTanyN1-3)(p < 0.01). No difference in OS was noted by receipt of AC in the overall cohort (median OS 24.6 months with AC vs 22.0 months without AC; p = 0.18), or when stratified by pathologic stage. On multivariable analysis, receipt of AC was not significantly associated with overall mortality (HR 0.86; 95%CI 0.74−1.01; p = 0.06) for all patients. When stratified by stage, AC was associated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality among patients with pT4N0 disease (HR 0.56; 95%CI 0.33−0.97; p = 0.04), but not pT3N0 or pTanyN1−3 (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with adverse pathology at RC after NAC have a median OS of approximately 2 years. AC was not associated with improved survival, except in the subgroup with pT4N0 disease. Clinical trials with newer systemic therapies are warranted for patients in this setting.

scholarly journals High-risk bladder cancer: improving outcomes with perioperative chemotherapy

2011 ◽  
pp. 4-8
Author(s):  
Daniel Y.C. Heng ◽  
Jorge A. Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
High Risk Disease ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Despite treatment with radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, muscle invasive bladder cancer has a relapse rate of 50%. Patients can develop regionally advanced or metastatic disease that ultimately leads to death. The addition of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy to reduce the risk of relapse and death has been extensively studied over the past two decades. Two contemporary trials coupled with a recent meta-analysis evaluating neoadjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated a modest but real improvement in overall survival. This has made neoadjuvant chemotherapy a standard of care. Clinical trials evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk disease have been plagued with statistical flaws and have, therefore, been unable to define the survival impact of this approach. It is hoped that ongoing adjuvant trials that are powered to detect small but meaningful clinical differences will clarify the benefit of chemotherapy after cystectomy. Since there are theoretical advantages and disadvantages to each of these approaches, both are widely used in North America. The evidence behind each approach and potential future developments in this field will be described.

scholarly journals Predictors of referral for neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and changes in practice over time

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey T. Gotto ◽  
Melissa Shea-Budgell ◽  
M. Sarah Rose ◽  
J. Dean Ruether
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer ◽  
Curative Therapy ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Muscle Invasive ◽  
Over Time

Introduction: In patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) fit for curative therapy, a multidisciplinary approach consisting is recommended. This approach includes local treatment (usually radical cystectomy), ideally combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Despite a survival benefit with NACT, uptake remains low. We assessed NACT consultation in Alberta and examined associative factors, as well as the relationship to survival.Methods: Patients with MIBC were identified through the Alberta Cancer Registry. Demographic and clinicopathologic information was collected from electronic medical records between 2007 and 2011. In addition to descriptive statistics, logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with receiving NACT consultation. Overall survival was described using a Kaplan-Meier estimate.Results: Of the 315 radical cystectomy patients, 140 (45.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 39.5, 50.8) received NACT consultation. Patients ≥80 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.21, 95% CI 0.08, 0.57, p = 0.002) and those treated in Calgary (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.05, 0.25, p < 0.001) were less likely to receive NACT consultation. The rate of NACT consultation increased steadily from 2007 to 2011 (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04, 1.45 per year of diagnosis, p = 0.018). After a median follow-up of 28.1 months (range: 14.6–50.3), median survival was 54.7 months for patients who received NACT consultation versus 31.2 months for those who did not (p = 0.030).Conclusions: NACT consultation in patients with MIBC undergoing radical cystectomy has improved over time; however, regional differences underscore the need for a standardized approach to NACT consultation, including common referral mechanisms.

scholarly journals Effect of cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival in patients with bladder cancer: a meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Li ◽  
Hui-min Niu ◽  
Hong-tao Wu ◽  
Bao-yu Lei ◽  
Xiao-hua Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Pubmed Central ◽  
Similar Survival ◽  
Muscle Invasive

Purpose: Cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been shown to improve survival in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who underwent radical cystectomy as compared with patients who underwent surgery alone. It has also been suggested as current standard of care in surgically-fit patients with MIBC. This meta-analysis assessed the effect of cisplatin-based NAC on survival in patients with bladder cancer. Source: PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase were searched until November 22, 2016. Two-arm randomized controlled trials that compared cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus local treatment versus the same local treatment without neoadjuvant chemotherapy were selected. Patients with histologically-confirmed bladder cancer (adenocarcinoma, transitional, or squamous-cell carcinoma) were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Principal findings: Of the 292 articles initially identified, 14 were included in the final analysis. Patients in the NAC group had similar OS as the local treatment (i.e., radiation therapy or cystectomy) group (pooled hazard ratio [HR] = 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 1.00, P=0.056). No difference in progress-free survival between two groups was observed (P=0.725). Subgroup analysis showed that OS was similar in patients treated with NAC plus radiotherapy or cystectomy compared with patients who received local treatment alone. Conclusions: Platinum-based NAC was associated with similar survival benefit as patients undergoing cystectomy and/or radiotherapy. No conclusion can be drawn about the optimal platinum-based combination to be used in the neoadjuvant setting.

Multi-institutional quality-of-care initiative for nonmetastatic, muscle-invasive, transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: Phase I.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 240-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Feifer ◽  
J. M. Taylor ◽  
M. Shouery ◽  
G. D. Steinberg ◽  
W. M. Stadler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Transitional Cell ◽  
Perioperative Chemotherapy ◽  
Treatment Variation ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Muscle Invasive

240 Background: Evidence supports multimodality treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer [MIBC] with the strongest evidence (level 1) existing for cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although reflected in guidelines for the management of MIBC, little is known about the variation of actual practice patterns among academic institutions. We thus evaluated treatment variation among 14 academic centers in the management of patients with MIBC. Methods: Retrospective data were collected for centralized analysis. All patients who underwent radical cystectomy for clinical T2-4 N0M0 MIBC from 2003–2008 were eligible for inclusion. Specific endpoints for analysis included: rates of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, cisplatin use, number of cycles and rates of pelvic lymphadenectomy. Results: 14 institutions participated and data on 4,541 patients who met inclusion criteria were tabulated. Overall 34% of patients received perioperative chemotherapy. The overall use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy was 12% and 22%, respectively. In a subset analysis of those patients with specific chemotherapy agent information provided (n=3,120), 59% of patients managed with perioperative chemotherapy received cisplatin. Of those who received treatment in the neoadjuvant setting, cisplatinum was received in 65% of cases (supported by level 1 evidence). 80% of patients who received perioperative chemotherapy received at least 3 cycles. At radical cystectomy 95% of patients received a bilateral PLND. Conclusions: In this cohort of academic North American centers, 66% of potentially eligible bladder cancer patients undergoing radical cystectomy did not receive perioperative chemotherapy. Only 12% of patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and 35% of those patients received a non-cisplatin based regimens. Despite level 1 evidence that cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with a survival advantage, only a small percentage of eligible patients undergoing radical cystectomy for muscle invasive, resectable disease receive combined treatment. Further study is needed clarify specific reasons for the treatment variation observed in academic centers. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document