scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in Italy: ethical and organizational considerations

Author(s):  
Stefano G. Nardini ◽  
Claudio Maria Sanguinetti ◽  
Fernando De Benedetto ◽  
Claudio Baccarani ◽  
Mario Del Donno ◽  
...  

The current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is still raging in Italy. The country is currently plagued by a huge burden of virus relatedcases and deaths. So far, the disease has highlighted a number of problems, some in common with other Countries and others peculiar to Italy which has suffered from a mortality rate higher than that observed in China and in most Countries in the world. The causes must be sought not only in the average age of the population (one of the oldest in the world), but also in the inconsistencies of the regional health systems (into which the National Health System is divided) and their delayed response, at least in some areas. Ethical issues emerged from the beginning, ranging from restrictions on freedom of movements and restrictions on personal privacy due to the lockdown, further to the dilemma for healthcare professionals to select people for ICU hospitalization in a shortage of beds in Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Organizational problems also emerged, although an official 2007 document from the Ministry of Health had planned not only what measures had to be taken during an epidemic caused by respiratory viruses, but also what had to be done in the inter-epidemic period (including the establishment of DPIs stocks and ventilators), vast areas of Italy were totally unprepared to cope with the disease, as a line of that document was not implemented. Since organizational problems can worsen (and even cause) ethical dilemmas, every effort should be made in the near future to prepare the health system to respond to a similar emergency in a joint, coherent, and homogeneous way across the Country, as planned in the 2007 document. In this perspective, Pulmonary Units and specialists can play a fundamental role in coping with the disease not only in hospitals, as intermediate care units, but also at a territorial level in an integrated network with GPs.

Author(s):  
Claudia Palumbo ◽  
Umberto Volpe

Italy is among countries in the world with the highest population of older people, with Italian elderly people accounting for over 20% of the total population of the country, and ranks second in Europe in terms of the ‘ageing index’ (i.e. the number of people aged 65 and above per 100 youths under the age of 15). In Italy, over 1 million people suffer from dementia, including approximately 600,000 cases of Alzheimer’s disease. Since 2000, a specific National Dementia Plan was initiated and Alzheimer’s Evaluation Units (UVAs) were introduced in all Italian regions to coordinate systematically the complex care process for dementia. Some Italian regions have recently deemed appropriate to change the denomination of UVAs to ‘Evaluation Units of Dementia’ (UVDs) and/or ‘Centres for Cognitive Impairment’. More recently, the Italian Ministry of Health launched an initiative aimed at improving the essential levels of assistance/care (LEA). The LEA represent all activities and services deemed essential to all Italian citizens and that the Italian national health system has to ensure are available, either on a free basis or by paying a participation fee, depending on patients’ situations.


2008 ◽  
Vol 57 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter Ricciardi

Secondo le conclusioni del Rapporto 2000 dell’Organizzazione Mondiale della Sanità l’Italia aveva il secondo miglior sistema sanitario al mondo e gli Italiani una delle più elevate aspettative di vita del pianeta, ma dal 2001, in seguito ad una riforma costituzionale, le 19 regioni e le due province autonome hanno acquisito una fortissima autonomia in tema di programmazione, organizzazione e gestione dei servizi sanitari che viene esercitata con grandissima eterogeneità. Queste variazioni regionali riflettono (ed accentuano) le differenze di contesto politico, economico e culturale che caratterizzano le diverse aree del nostro Paese. Un’analisi comparata recente ha evidenziato che 14 delle 21 regioni e province autonome offrono servizi sanitari adeguati ai cittadini in un quadro di compatibilità finanziaria, ma anche che 6 regioni sono in profonda crisi e sull’orlo di una catastrofe finanziaria. Questo lavoro analizza l’evoluzione del sistema sanitario italiano e le sue performance a discutere sulle sfide che lo coinvolgono, in primis quella di contenere i costi e garantire un equo sistema di offerta di servizi a tutti i cittadini. ---------- According to the conclusions of the World Health Organisation’s 2000 report Italy had the second best health system in the world with Italians having one of the highest life expectancy, but since 2001 the 19 Italian Regions and 2 Autonomous Provinces exercise their autonomy very differently, with Northern regions being more successful in establishing effective structures of health care delivery, management and monitoring, compared to the regions in the South. This regional variation in health care reflects (and exacerbates) differences of contextual, i.e. political, economic and cultural factors as well as differences between regional health systems. A recent survey showed that in 14 of the 21 Regions and Autonomous Provinces the system is fairly well performing and well perceived by citizens but also that 6 Regions are on the verge of financial and service breakdown. This article outlines the structure of Italy health system, analyses its performance and discusses the challenges it faces, not least in trying to contain costs and offer equitable care to all citizens.


2000 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-67
Author(s):  
Hróbjartur Jónatansson

AbstractIn December 1998, Iceland's Parliament, the Althing, passed the Act on a Health Sector Database (the Database Act or Act), a highly controversial law authorizing the development of a Health Sector Database (the Database) to collect genetic and medical information already contained in various locations around Iceland as part of Iceland's national health system. As a result of the Database Act, Iceland is the only country in the world with laws authorizing collection and storage of the genetic heritage of an entire population by a private biotechnology corporation with rights to exploit the data as a commercial commodity. Many databases now exist in Iceland as individual and segregated entities that contain detailed medical information about every Icelandic person, both living and dead, dating back to 1915 when the recording commenced.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (11) ◽  
pp. 1045-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Dalmoro ◽  
Roger Rosa ◽  
Ronaldo Bordin

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: To describe the number of funds made by the Brazilian National Health System to normal delivery and cesarean procedures, according to the Brazilian regions in 2015, and estimate the cost cutting if the recommendation concerning the prevalence of cesarean deliveries by the World Health Organization (10 to 15%) were respected. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the Hospital Information System of the Brazilian National Health System. The variables considered were the type of delivery (cesarean section and normal), geographic region of admission, length of stay and amount paid for admission in 2015. RESULTS: In the year 2015, there were 984,307 admissions to perform labor in the five Brazilian regions, of which 36.2% were cesarean section. The Northeast and Southeast regions were the two regions that had the highest number of normal deliveries and cesarean sections. The overall average hospital stay for delivery was 3.2 days. About R$ 650 million (US$ 208,5 million) were paid, 45% of the total in cesarean deliveries. If the maximum prevalence proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) were considered, there would be a potential reduction in spending in the order of R$ 57.7 million (US$ 18,5 million). CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean sections are above the parameter recommended by the WHO in all Brazilian regions. The Northeast and Southeast had the highest total number of normal and cesarean deliveries and thus the greatest potential reduction in estimated costs (69.6% of all considered reduction).


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 05-08
Author(s):  
Luiz Carlos de Abreu

The National Health System, being named unique in the Constitution because it refers to a set of elements, such as universalization, equity, integrality, decentralization and  popular participation  and which is in convergence with the  Constitution of 1988  of the Federative Republic of Brazil,  which  states that health is a right of all and a duty of the State.Thus, with the creation of SUS, the entire Brazilian population now has the right to universal and free health care , financed with resources from the budgets of the Union, the States, the Federal District and the Municipalities, as regulated by article 195 of the Brazilian Constitution. It is noteworthy that SUS is one of the most powerful and important in the world and  it serves about 220 million people. It   is characterized by a foundation of three pillars: universality, integrality and equity.


BMJ Leader ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. leader-2020-000343
Author(s):  
Amit Jain ◽  
Tinglong Dai ◽  
Christopher G Myers ◽  
Punya Jain ◽  
Shruti Aggarwal

Elective surgical suspension during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a sizeable surgical case backlog throughout the world. As we ramp back up, how do we decide which cases take priority? Potential future waves (or a future pandemic) may lead to additional surgical shutdown and subsequent reopening. Deciding which cases to prioritise in the face of limited health system capacity has emerged as a new challenge for healthcare leaders. Here we present an ethically grounded and operationally efficient surgical prioritisation framework for healthcare leaders and practitioners, drawing insights from decision analysis and organisational sciences.


2021 ◽  
pp. 112067212110221
Author(s):  
Daniele Giovanni Ghiglioni ◽  
Anna Maria Zicari ◽  
Giuseppe Fabio Parisi ◽  
Giuseppe Marchese ◽  
Cristiana Indolfi ◽  
...  

Vernal keratoconjunctivitis (VKC) and atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) are potentially severe and complex disease in its management among the various allergic eye diseases. In this regard, studies clarified the etiopathogenetic mechanisms. The workup should be multidisciplinary. The treatment includes topical and systemic medications with anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressant activity. However, a definition of nationally- and internationally-shared diagnostic protocols would also be needed and validated access to therapeutic options of proven safety and efficacy to avoid the use of galenic preparations, up to now still essential in the management of moderate-severe VKC. Finally, recognizing VKC and AKC, among rare diseases, at a national and international level would be an essential step to allow the management of VKC with adequate timings and settings within the National Health System.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1870.1-1870
Author(s):  
I. García Hernández ◽  
L. Fernández de la Fuente Bursón ◽  
P. Muñoz Reinoso ◽  
D. V. Mendoza Mendoza ◽  
B. Hernández-Cruz ◽  
...  

Background:Musculoskeletal Diseases (MSKD) represent one of the main health problems burdens worldwide. They cause a significant functional, quality of life and socioeconomic impact. Knee and lumbar osteoarthritis are the most prevalent1. MSKD can be assessed by different kind of specialists: Orthopedic and Traumatology Surgery (OTS), Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, each of them focused at one of the distinct aspects of the same disease. It is the General Practitioner (GP) consultations that usually act as a gateway to specialized care. However, this derivation is carried out in non-standardized manners that leads to an evaluation from a sometimes wrong selected specialist or sometimes overlap management between several of them2. The result is an endless waiting list in an overburden health system that cannot solve people’s health issues. In 2018, only in our area, 32.894 patients with MSKD were referred from GP to the different medical consultations: OTS (65%), Rehabilitation (25%) and Rheumatology (10%). Furthermore, there are specialized consultations called“Primary Trauma”to which GP can refer which are managed indistinctly by any of the 3 specialists mentioned before.Objectives:The following study aims to assess by collecting data in one of these consultations, how these pathologies are referred to the different specialist and the role that the rheumatologist plays in its management.Methods:From January to March 2019, 300 consecutive patients´ medical records from the HUVM area that were sent to “Primary Trauma” consultations and attended by a rheumatologist have been reviewed. The reason for consultation, tests and referrals requested, diagnoses reached and procedures and other therapeutic actions performed were collected. Descriptive statistics with percentages and mean are showed.Results:The average age of the patients was 51 years [7-88], 57% (170) women and 43% (130) men. The most frequent reasons for referral were knee pain (26), foot pathology (23%), low back pain (12%) and carpal tunnel syndrome (6%). 68% (204 patients) attended the consultation with some test already performed request in primary care, mostly radiographs (61%) and MRI scan (34%). After the first assessment during consultation, only 31% required new studies. The diagnoses that were most frequently established are showed in table 1: degenerative knee pathology (29%) was the most prevalent. 60% of the patients assessed were given exercise tables and/or postural recommendations. 14% received an infiltration on the same day of the visit. Only 78 patients (26%) needed to be reviewed later in those consultations. Of the remaining 222 (74%), 81 (27%) were referred to other specialists. 56 of them (19%) went to OTS to a surgical evaluation, most frequently of the knee (32%), hand (27%) and foot (23%). 141 (47%) were discharged and referred to GP´s for follow ups.Table 1.Diagnoses.N%Degenerative knee pathology6729Plantar support alterations3415Lumbar osteoarthritis198Deformities of the feet177Mechanical metatarsalgia125Plantar fasciitis94Carpal tunnel syndrome94Conclusion:The prevalence of MSKD found in medical consultation coincides with the national registers. Most patients did not need to be referred to surgical units. The role of the Rheumatologist is to take a comprehensive care for the patient, focusing on giving an effective evaluation and quick solution to his MSKD. In short, if the most prevalent MSKD are not subsidiary of surgical treatment (at least initially), the specialist whom patients with MSKD should be referred would be the rheumatologist.References:[1]EPISER2016: Estudio de la prevalencia de las enfermedades reumáticas en población adulta en España. Sociedad Española de Reumatología. Madrid, 2018.[2]Conill EM et al. Waiting lists in public systems: from expanding supply to timely access? Reflections on Spain’s National Health System. Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16:2783–94.Disclosure of Interests:Isabel García Hernández: None declared, Lola Fernández de la Fuente Bursón: None declared, Paloma Muñoz Reinoso: None declared, Dolores V. Mendoza Mendoza: None declared, Blanca Hernández-Cruz Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Sanofi, BMS, STADA, Paz González Moreno: None declared, José Javier Pérez Venegas: None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document