scholarly journals Prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease

2013 ◽  
pp. 269-276
Author(s):  
Marcora Mandreoli ◽  
Antonio Santoro
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Therapeutic Doses

Despite the high morbidity and mortality associated with venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients with a number of risk factors, and large evidence that prophylaxis is effective, prophylaxis rates remain elusive in medically ill patients. Furthermore, in patients with renal failure, prophylaxis often is omitted or sub-optimal, due to fear of provoking hemorrhage. Patients with end-stage renal disease often have platelet deficits. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) therapy may also be difficult to manage in these cases because LMWH clearance is largely dependent on the kidneys. Administration of LMWH to patients with some degree of renal failure may lead to bioaccumulation of anti-Xa activity with an increased risk of bleeding. In recent years, LMWH has largely replaced unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment and prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease. LMWHs have been shown to be superior to UFH in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. They are also easier to administer and do not require laboratory monitoring. However, several case reports and a metaanalysis indicate that the use of LMWHs at therapeutic doses in patients with advanced renal failure can be associated with major bleeding with serious adverse effects. In this paper, we review recent evidence supporting the safety of LMWHs at prophylactic doses in patients with mild or moderate renal disease. Current evidence suggests that bioaccumulation of enoxaparin (the most widely used LMWH) can occur when the drug is used at standard therapeutic doses in patients with severely impaired renal function. This risk can be reduced by empiric dose reduction or monitoring of anti-Xa heparin levels.

Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Acutely Ill Medical Patients: A New Era

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (02) ◽  
pp. 308-315
Author(s):  
Kira MacDougall ◽  
Alex C. Spyropoulos
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Preventive Strategy ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
New Era ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Medically Ill Patients ◽  
Patient Subgroups

AbstractVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is the leading preventable cause of death in hospitalized patients and data consistently show that acutely ill medical patients remain at increased risk for VTE-related morbidity and mortality in the post-hospital discharge period. Prescribing extended thromboprophylaxis for up to 45 days following an acute hospitalization in key patient subgroups that include more than one-quarter of hospitalized medically-ill patients represents a paradigm shift in the way hospital-based physicians think about VTE prevention. Advances in the field of primary thromboprophylaxis in acutely-ill medical patients using validated VTE and bleeding risk assessment models have established key patient subgroups at high risk of VTE and low risk of bleeding that may benefit from both in-hospital and extended thromboprophylaxis. The direct oral anticoagulants betrixaban and rivaroxaban are now U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved for in-hospital and extended thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients and provide net clinical benefit in these key subgroups. Coronavirus disease-2019 may predispose patients to VTE due to excessive inflammation, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and hemostasis. The optimum preventive strategy for these patients requires further investigation. This article aims to review the latest concepts in predicting and preventing VTE and discuss the new era of extended thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medically ill patients.

Abstract 47: Atrial Fibrillation is Associated With Increased Risk of Incident Venous Thromboembolism: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

Circulation ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 135 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela L Lutsey ◽  
Faye L Norby ◽  
Alvaro Alonso ◽  
Mary Cushman ◽  
Lin Y Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Atherosclerosis Risk ◽  
Shared Risk

Background: It is well-established that atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with thrombus formation in the left atrium, which can lead to ischemic stroke. Case reports, autopsies, and transesophageal echo data have indicated that clot formation also occurs in the right atrium (i.e. right-side intracardiac thrombosis) of AF patients, which could lead to pulmonary embolism (PE). However, it is unclear whether this occurrence is common. Objective: Test the hypotheses that individuals with incident AF are at elevated risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), and that the association will be stronger for those presenting with PE alone versus PE and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or DVT alone. Methods: A total of 15,205 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study participants, aged 45-64 years, were followed from baseline (1987-1989) to 2011 for incidence of AF and VTE (median follow-up 19.8 years). Incident AF and VTE events were identified via active surveillance and defined by relevant hospital discharge ICD codes. VTE events were validated by medical record review. Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used, with AF modeled as a time-dependent covariate. We also evaluated separately risk of PE without evidence of DVT, DVT without PE, and events presenting with both PE and DVT. Results: At baseline participants were on average 54 years old, 55% female and 26% black. In the absence of AF there were 678 VTE events, for an incidence rate of 2.6 per 1000 person-years. After an AF diagnosis there were 77 events, with an incidence rate of 7.1 per 1000 person-years. In multivariable-adjusted models, having AF (versus no AF) was associated with a greater risk of incident VTE; the HR (95% CI) was 2.10 (1.65-2.68) after adjustment for demographics, 1.82 (1.42-2.32) additionally accounting for numerous AF and VTE risk factors, and 1.97 (1.53-2.53) after further adjusting for time-dependent anticoagulant use. When we restricted to PE events without evidence of DVT there were 188 events in total, of which 19 occurred following a diagnosis of AF. The HR for AF (versus no AF) was 1.53 (0.92-2.56) in fully adjusted models. For DVT alone there were 384 events in total, of which 48 occurred after AF diagnosis; the HR for AF was 2.43 (1.77-3.33). Among the 116 events presenting with both DVT and PE, 10 occurred after AF diagnosis, and the HR for AF was 1.36 (0.67-2.75). Conclusions: Diagnosis with AF was associated with a nearly 2-fold increased risk of incident VTE. The association was not stronger when isolated to those with PE without DVT, suggesting that higher risk of VTE among AF patients may be due to either the coagulation abnormalities that accompany AF, or shared risk factors that were not fully accounted for in this analysis.

Disease burden and unmet needs for prevention of venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients in Europe show underutilisation of preventive therapies

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 600-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Welner ◽  
Maria Kubin ◽  
Kerstin Folkerts ◽  
Sylvia Haas ◽  
Hanane Khoury
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Medical Inpatients ◽  
Clear Identification

SummaryIt was the aim of this review to assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and current practice patterns for VTE prophylaxis among medical patients with acute illness in Europe. A literature search was conducted on the epidemiology and prophylaxis practices of VTE prevention among adult patients treated in-hospital for major medical conditions. A total of 21 studies with European information published between 1999 and April 2010 were retrieved. Among patients hospitalised for an acute medical illness, the incidence of VTE varied between 3.65% (symptomatic only over 10.9 days) and 14.9% (asymptomatic and symptomatic over 14 days). While clinical guidelines recommend pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for patients admitted to hospital with an acute medical illness who are bedridden, clear identification of specific risk groups who would benefit from VTE prophylaxis is lacking. In the majority of studies retrieved, prophylaxis was under-used among medical inpatients; 21% to 62% of all patients admitted to the hospital for acute medical illnesses did not receive VTE prophylaxis. Furthermore, among patients who did receive prophylaxis, a considerable proportion received medication that was not in accord with guidelines due to short duration, suboptimal dose, or inappropriate type of prophylaxis. In most cases, the duration of VTE prophylaxis did not exceed hospital stay, the mean duration of which varied between 5 and 11 days. In conclusion, despite demonstrated efficacy and established guidelines supporting VTE prophylaxis, utilisation rates and treatment duration remain suboptimal, leaving medical patients at continued risk for VTE. Improved guideline adherence and effective care delivery among the medically ill are stressed.

Special conditions: kidney disease

ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 947-950
Author(s):  
Drazenka Pongrac Barlovic ◽  
Per-Henrik Groop
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Renal Failure ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Beneficial Effect ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Microvascular Damage ◽  
Increased Risk

Kidney disease is one of the most common and important consequences of microvascular damage in diabetes. Its occurrence largely determines the increased risk of cardiovascular events and remarkably shortens life expectancy. Therefore, protecting the kidney is one of the main aims of patient care in diabetes and should be based on implementation of the intensive treatment of risk factors that promote its progression to prevent renal failure, and even more importantly, cardiovascular events. Very recently, some new therapies with a beneficial effect on renal disease have emerged; however, there is still plenty of room for additional innovative treatment strategies to prevent, arrest, treat, and reverse kidney disease caused by diabetes and its devastating consequences.

scholarly journals Effectiveness and safety of inpatient versus extended venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis with heparin following major pelvic surgery for malignancy: protocol for a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bridget Heijkoop ◽  
Natalie Parker ◽  
George Kiroff ◽  
Daniel Spernat
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Systematic Reviews ◽  
Pelvic Surgery ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Optimum Duration ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common postoperative complication associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The use of prophylactic heparin postoperatively reduces this risk, and the use of extended duration prophylaxis is becoming increasingly common. Malignancy and pelvic surgery both independently further increase the risk of postoperative VTE and patients undergoing major pelvic surgery for malignancy are at particularly high risk of VTE. However, the optimum duration of prophylaxis specifically in this population currently remains unclear. Methods We will conduct a systematic review of literature in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 5.1.0.,2011) to evaluate current evidence of the effectiveness and safety of inpatient versus extended VTE prophylaxis with heparin (all forms) following major pelvic surgery for malignancy. We will search PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Regarding safety, Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) websites will be searched, including all levels of evidence. Results will be the postoperative timeframe in which a VTE event can be considered to have been provoked by the surgery, and the number of patients needed to treat with both inpatient and extended prophylaxis to prevent a VTE event in this timeframe, comparing these to determine if there is a significant benefit from extended prophylaxis. Discussion This systematic review will aim to identify the postoperative period in which patients undergoing major pelvic surgery for malignancy are at further increased risk of VTE as a result of their surgery and the optimum duration of heparin VTE prophylaxis with heparin to reduce this risk. Determining this will allow evidence-based recommendations to be made for the optimum duration of heparin VTE prophylaxis post major pelvic surgery for malignancy, leading to improved standards of care that are consistent between different providers and institutions. Systematic review registration In accordance with guidelines, our systematic review was submitted to PROSPERO for consideration of registration on 16/12/17 and was registered on 12/1/18 with the registration number CRD42018068961, and it was last updated on December 1, 2018.

scholarly journals Novel Haplotype Indicator for End-Stage Renal Disease Progression among Saudi Patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Cyril Cyrus ◽  
Shahanas Chathoth ◽  
Chittibabu Vatte ◽  
Nafie Alrubaish ◽  
Othman Almuhanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage Renal Disease ◽  
Haplotype Analysis ◽  
Taqman Assay ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Glomerular Diseases ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Stage Renal Disease ◽  
End Stage

Background. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is the result of hypertensive nephrosclerosis and chronic glomerular diseases and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. There are strong heritable components in the manifestation of the disease with a genetic predisposition to renal disorders, including focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and arterionephrosclerosis. Recent studies in genetics have examined modifiable risk factors that contribute to renal disease, and this has provided a deep insight into progressive kidney disease. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms at the proximity of SHROOM3, CST3, SLC7A9, and MYH9 genes have been associated with an increased risk of developing CKD and ESRD. Methods. A total of 160 CKD patients and 189 control subjects of Saudi origin participated in the study. Eight polymorphisms (SHROOM3-rs9992101, rs17319721; SLC7A9-rs4805834; MYH9-rs4821480, rs4821481, rs2032487, rs3752462; CST3-rs13038305) were genotyped using TaqMan assay, and the haplotype analysis was done using the HaploView 4.2 software. Results. Haplotype analysis revealed a novel haplotype “E6”-GTTT to be associated significantly with an increased risk for ESRD (p=0.0001) and CKD (p=0.03). Conclusion. CKD is often silent until symptomatic uremia during the advanced stages of the disease. The newly identified haplotype will help recognize patients at risk for a rapid progression of CKD to ESRD. Accurate detection and mapping of the genetic variants facilitates improved risk stratification and development of improved and targeted therapeutic management for CKD.

In-hospital symptomatic venous thromboembolism and antithrombotic prophylaxis in Internal Medicine

2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (05) ◽  
pp. 893-901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mauro Campanini ◽  
Mauro Silingardi ◽  
Gianluigi Scannapieco ◽  
Antonino Mazzone ◽  
Giovanna Magni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Antithrombotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Medical Inpatients ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Heterogeneous Setting

SummaryHospitalised medical patients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the incidence of hospitalisation-related VTE in unselected medical inpatients has not been extensively studied, and uncertainties remain about the optimal use of thromboprophylaxis in this setting. Aims of our prospective, observational study were to assess the prevalence of VTE and the incidence of symptomatic, hospitalisation-related events in a cohort of consecutive patients admitted to 27 Internal Medicine Departments, and to evaluate clinical factors associated with the use of thromboprophylaxis. Between March and September 2006, a total of 4,846 patients were included in the study. Symptomatic VTE with onset of symptoms later than 48 hours after admission (”hospital-acquired” events, primary study end-point) occurred in 26 patients (0.55٪), while the overall prevalence of VTE (including diagnosis prior to or at admission) was 3.65٪. During hospital stay antithrombotic prophylaxis was administered in 41.6٪ of patients, and in 58.7% of those for whom prophylaxis was recommended according to the 2004 Guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians. The choice of administering thromboprophylaxis or not appeared qualitatively adherent to indications from randomised clinical trials and international guidelines, and bed rest was the strongest determinant of the use of prophylaxis. Data from our real-world study confirm that VTE is a relevant complication in patients admitted to Internal Medicine Departments, and recommended tromboprophylaxis is still under-used, in particular in some patients groups. Further efforts are needed to better define risk profile and to optimise prophylaxis in the heterogeneous setting of medical inpatients.

scholarly journals Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis and Risk for Acutely Medically Ill Patients Stratified by Different Ages and Renal Disease Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 107602961882328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alpesh Amin ◽  
W. Richey Neuman ◽  
Melissa Lingohr-Smith ◽  
Brandy Menges ◽  
Jay Lin
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Medically Ill Patients

The objectives of this study were to examine venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis patterns and risk for VTE events during hospitalization and in the outpatient continuum of care among patients hospitalized for acute illnesses in the United States with stratification by different age groups and renal disease status. Acutely ill hospitalized patients were identified from the MarketScan databases (January 1, 2012-June 30, 2015) and grouped by age (<65, 65-74, ≥75 years old) and whether or not they had a baseline diagnosis of renal disease, separately. Of acutely ill hospitalized patients, 60.1% (n = 10 748) were <65 years old, 15.7% (n = 2803) were 65 to 74 years old, and 24.3% (n = 4344) were ≥75 years old; 32.9% (n = 5892) had baseline renal disease. Among the study cohorts, the majority of patients received no VTE prophylaxis regardless of age or baseline renal status (52.1%-63.6%). Rates of VTE during hospitalization and in the 6 months postdischarge were 4.7%, 4.6%, and 4.5% for patients <65, 65 to 74, and ≥75 years old, respectively, and 6.3% and 3.8% for patients with and without baseline renal disease. The risk for VTE was elevated for 30 to 40 days after index admission regardless of age and renal disease status.

How we manage venous thromboembolism during pregnancy

Blood ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 100 (10) ◽  
pp. 3470-3478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon M. Bates ◽  
Jeffrey S. Ginsberg
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Unresolved Issue ◽  
Single Episode ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Recurrent Venous Thrombosis ◽  
Therapeutic Doses ◽  
Breast Fed

During pregnancy, physiologic and anatomic changes can complicate the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) as well as the management of patients with a high risk of or established VTE. As in nonpregnant subjects, clinical diagnosis of VTE by itself is unreliable and accurate objective testing is essential. Few diagnostic studies of VTE have been performed in pregnant women and, therefore, approaches are largely extrapolated from those used in nonpregnant subjects with modifications to limit the radiation exposure and overcome the limitations of diagnostic testing in pregnancy. Therapy of established VTE during pregnancy consists of therapeutic doses of unfractionated heparin (UFH) or low–molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), generally given throughout pregnancy subcutaneously and for 4 to 6 weeks after childbirth. A key unresolved issue includes the optimum dosing of LMWH therapy. Maternal warfarin can be safely used after childbirth because it is safe to use in the breast-fed infant of a mother receiving warfarin. Finally, pregnant women with prior VTE (with or without a hypercoagulable state) have an increased risk of recurrent venous thrombosis. A recent study has demonstrated that for women with a single episode of prior VTE, many can be managed without anticoagulants. However, for many, anticoagulant therapy with prophylactic UFH or LMWH is a reasonable option.

scholarly journals Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Acute Medically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3678-3678
Author(s):  
Anat Gafter-Gvili ◽  
Genady Drozdinsky ◽  
Oren Zusman ◽  
Shiri Kushnir ◽  
Leonard Leibovici
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Pharmacologic Prophylaxis ◽  
Medically Ill Patients

Background and Aims Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered as a preventable cause of death for hospitalized patients. Current guidelines recommend pharmacologic prophylaxis for medical patients considered high risk for VTE, despite failure of studies to show reduction in mortality. We aimed to assess the benefit and safety of VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards. Methods Retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to the internal medicine and acute geriatric departments, with an admission lasting more than 48 hours, during 2012-2018. Patients who received pharmacologic prophylaxis were compared to those who did not. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were the 90 day incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and major bleeding. Propensity-weighted logistic multivariable analysis was performed. Results A total of 18890 patient-unique episodes were included in the analysis. Of them 3206 (17%) received prophylaxis. A total of 1309 (6.9%) died. 540/1309 (41.3%) of those who received VTE prophylaxis died and 769/1309 (58.7%) of those who did not receive prophylaxis died. VTE Prophylaxis was not associated with a reduction in mortality, multivariate-adjusted OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.84-1.14). One hundred and forty two patients (0.7%) developed VTE. The frequency of VTE among patients who received VTE prophylaxis was 31% (44/142) compared with 69% (98/142) in patients who did not receive prophylaxis. The frequency of VTE in patients who had a Padua score ≥4 and received VTE prophylaxis, was 1.9% (30/1573) compared with 1.6% (44/2797) in those with a Padua score ≥4 who did not receive prophylaxis. 74/142 (52.1%) of patients with VTE had a Padua score ≥4, 44/1309 (1.4%) of those who received VTE prophylaxis and 98/15864 (0.6%) of those who did not. VTE Prophylaxis was not associated with reduction in VTE in the whole cohort, multivariable-adjusted OR 1.09 (95% CI 0.52-2.29). VTE prophylaxis was associated with an increase in major bleeding (multivariable-adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48) Conclusion The current practice of routinely administering VTE prophylaxis to medically ill patients considered at high risk for VTE, resulted in a high risk for bleeding a without clear clinical benefit, and should be reassessed. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document