scholarly journals Management of a failed metatarso-phalangeal joint fusion utilizing a hemicup prosthesis

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Stadler ◽  
Stefan Hofstätter ◽  
Klemens Trieb
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Salvage Procedure ◽  
Operative Techniques ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
First Report ◽  
Joint Fusion

We report a case of a 65-year-old man with a painful nonunion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ). It is one of the main severe complications of this surgery. Its prevalence is described between 5% and 10% across different operative techniques. The implantation of hemicup-prosthesis has been successfully used for the hallux rigidus treatment with very promising results. In our case report, we introduce a treatment method of converting a pseudoarthrosis of the first MTPJ, made of two crossing screws into a hemicup-prosthesis as a salvage procedure. This is to our best knowledge the first report using this device for treatment of pseudoarthrosis of the first MTPJ.

Evaluation of Metatarsal Head Resurfacing Hemiarthroplasty in the Surgical Treatment of Hallux Rigidus: A Retrospective Study and Mid- to Long-Term Follow-up

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Musa Uğur Mermerkaya ◽  
Erkan Alkan ◽  
Mehmet Ayvaz
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Metatarsal Head ◽  
Treatment Method ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

Background. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mid- to long-term outcomes of metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty in the surgical treatment of advanced-stage hallux rigidus. Methods. We performed a retrospective review of 57 consecutive patients (25 [43.9%] males, 32 [56.1%] females; mean age, 61.0 ± 6.4 years) who underwent first metatarsal head resurfacing hemiarthroplasty (HemiCAP) for hallux rigidus between August 2007 and September 2010. Sixty-five implantations were performed in 57 patients; 8 patients underwent bilateral procedures. All patients were clinically rated prior to surgery and at the final follow-up visit using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hallux metatarsophalangeal-interphalangeal scale and first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion (MTPJ ROM). Results. The median follow-up duration was 81 (range = 8-98) months. The median preoperative AOFAS score was 34 (range = 22-59) points, which had increased to 83 (range = 26-97) points at the final follow-up visit (P < .001). The median preoperative first MTPJ ROM was 25° (range = 15° to 40°), which had increased to 75° (range = 30° to 85°) at the final follow-up visit (P < .001). Conclusions. First MTPJ hemiarthroplasty is an effective treatment method that recovers toe function and first MTPJ ROM, and provides good mid- to long-term functional outcomes. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Retrospective case series

Hallux Varus Interphalangeus Following Osteochondral Fracture of the Proximal Phalanx: A Case Report

2020 ◽  
Vol 110 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Calvin J. Rushing ◽  
Tarak Amin ◽  
Alberto Herrada ◽  
Steven M. Spinner
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Hallux Valgus ◽  
Proximal Phalanx ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Osteochondral Fracture ◽  
Medial Head ◽  
Hallux Varus ◽  
Hallux Valgus Interphalangeus ◽  
Joint Fusion

Hallux valgus interphalangeus deformity has been previously reported in the literature following trauma and first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. However, to the best of our knowledge, hallux varus interphalangeus deformity has not been previously reported. We present the case of a 26-year-old skeletally mature woman who sustained an acute, open hallux varus interphalangeus injury following an osteochondral fracture of the medial head of the proximal phalanx.

Arthrodesis of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kalpesh Shah ◽  
Angelica Augustine ◽  
Robert Carter ◽  
Angus McFadyen
Keyword(s):  
Interobserver Reliability ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Lag Screw ◽  
Fixation Group ◽  
Joint Fusion ◽  
Bone Fragments ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Time

Background: There are cadaveric and biomechanical studies comparing different methods of fixation for achieving arthrodesis in hallux rigidus. However, there are no comparative clinical studies. We compared the clinical and radiologic outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion using three different techniques: lag screw, lag screw and circlage wire, and Memory staples. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 46 patients who underwent first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. All of the operations were performed by experienced surgeons. Each patient had clinical and radiologic assessments postoperatively. Results: The three groups were matching in terms of demographic features and comorbidity. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for radiographic metatarsophalangeal joint fusion was excellent. The mean time to clinical and radiologic union in the Memory staples group was earlier (7.6 weeks) than that of the other two techniques (8.0 and 8.1 weeks). The Memory staples group also had the lowest incidence of nonunion (1 of 15 compared with 4 of 15 in the single lag screw fixation group and 3 of 16 in the lag screw and circlage wire fixation group) and no hardware-related problems. Conclusions: Our experience corroborates the advantages of Memory staples as described in the literature, including good approximation of bone fragments, technically easy application with fewer steps than an AO-applied screw, and an adequate source of internal fixation to achieve metatarsophalangeal joint fusion. There is also a suggestion that the time to achieve fusion is shorter. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102(1): 13-17, 2012)

scholarly journals Percutaneous First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 724-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Bauer
Keyword(s):  
Simple Procedure ◽  
Weight Bearing ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Full Weight Bearing ◽  
Normal Walking ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Fusion ◽  
Forefoot Surgery ◽  
First Ray

The first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint fusion is a very useful procedure in forefoot surgery and is still the gold standard for the treatment of severe and painful hallux rigidus. Normal walking and running are possible after MTP1 fusion, the first ray mobility being essentially in the interphalangeal (IP) joint with a compensatory hypermobility in dorsal flexion. Percutaneous MTP1 fusion is a simple procedure providing comparable results to fusions performed with open techniques. Postoperative cares are simplified with an immediate full weight bearing on rigid flat shoes and quick return to normal walking. Bone preparation is an important step and requires an experience in percutaneous forefoot surgery. Arthrodesis positioning and fixation with this percutaneous procedure are simple with possibility of clinical and radiological control. The indications for percutaneous MTP1 fusion are very large and only severe bone loss or osteoporosis represent the limits for this technique.

scholarly journals Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus and Impact of Arthrodesis versus Arthroplasty on Patient Reported Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Monique Chambers ◽  
MaCalus Hogan ◽  
Dukens LaBaze
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
End Stage

Category: Bunion, Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Hallux rigidus is a degenerative disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Severe, end-stage hallux rigidus can become debilitating with surgical intervention becoming necessary once conservative measures and shoe modifications have failed. Joint salvage procedures include metatarsal phalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis and MTP arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in patient reported outcomes in two cohorts who underwent fusion or joint reconstruction. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 385 patients from an academic medical institution. Patients who underwent surgical intervention from July 2015 to November 2016 were identified based on CPT codes for MTP arthrodesis (28750) and arthroplasty (28293). We extracted outcome scores including SF12-M, SF12-P, FAAM, and VAS scores. Exclusion criteria included poly-trauma, revision procedures, and lack of pre and post-operative outcome scores. Mann- Whitney t-test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.0b for Mac to compare procedure groups, with significance define by a p-value of 0.05. Results: A total of eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria, with 6 who underwent arthroplasty and 12 arthrodesis. The average age was 63.7 amongst the cohort, with a total of 16 female and 2 males. Patients who underwent arthrodesis had better outcomes across all parameters. When comparing preoperative and postoperative scores, arthrodesis patients showed greater improvement of SF12-M (arthrodesis 9 vs arthroplasty -2, p=0.05), and SF12-P (9 vs -16, respectively p=0.05) scores. Arthroplasty patients were more likely to have a decrease in their SF-12 scores. VAS scores and FAAM scores showed no statistical difference between the two cohorts. Postoperative VAS scores were worse in 33% of arthroplasty patients despite surgical intervention, compared to 10% of arthrodesis patients. Conclusion: Our results suggests that both procedures provide a statistically significant difference in pain with several patients having a Global Rate of Change that is “very much better”. However, fusion of the metatarsophalangeal joint results in improved pain and functional outcomes for patients with severe hallux rigidus. These findings are consistent with current reports in the literature, which are mostly case series reports. Larger studies are needed to provide appropriate power and better support the findings of this study.

Arthrodesis of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint by Plate and Screws for Treatment of Hallux Rigidus (Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis)

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ossama Abdelraoof El Shazly ◽  
Mohamed Mokhtar Abdellah ◽  
Mostafa Abdelnabee Abouzaid
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Superficial Infection ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Meta Analyses

Abstract Background With continued loss of dorsiflexion of the 1st MTP, degenerative changes occur within the joint with severe restriction of movement and increase in pain, which leads to the condition known as hallux rigidus. The amount of dorsiflexion may be reduced to 0-10 degrees with pain on both active and passive motion. Objectives Systematically reviewing available evidence from published articles to assess the effectiveness of arthrodesis of first metatarsophalangeal joint by plate and screws in hallux rigidus. The assessment also would encompass safety, side effects, and complications of this mode of treatment. Materials and Methods We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance to the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) statement. PRISMA and MOOSE are reporting checklists for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers of Meta-analyses of interventional and observational studies. According to International committee of medical journal association (ICJME), reviewers must report their findings according to each of the items listed in those checklists. Results Previous results for arthrodesis have been favourable with a union rate of almost 96%. In the present systematic review and meta-analysis, the overall effect estimates showed that the union rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 96.2% (95% CI 94 – 98.4%). In addition, the overall effect estimates showed that the non-union rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 4.2% (95% CI 2.4 – 6.1%). Moreover, the overall effect estimates showed that the satisfaction rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 94.5% (95% CI 90 – 99%). In the present study, the overall effect estimates showed that the overall complications rate after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 7.2% (95% CI 2.5 – 12%). The overall effect estimates showed that the malunion rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ was 2.7% (95% CI 0 – 6.4%). Additionally, the overall effect estimates showed that the hardware removal and superficial infection rates after plate and screw arthrodesis for 1st MTPJ were 2% and 2.9%, respectively. Conclusion Our analysis showed that plate and screws fixation is effective techniques that can be used for first MTPJ arthrodesis in patients with hallux rigidus. We found that the screw and plate fixation has a significantly lower rate of nonunion compared with the screw alone, as reported by the literature. However, owing to the small group sizes and methodologic shortcomings, we were unable to identify the clinically superior fixation technique for first MTPJ arthrodesis arthrodesis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document