Embedding Active and Passive Devices in Medical Electronics

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 000786-000814
Author(s):  
John Dzarnoski ◽  
Susie Johansson

Efforts to increase the packaging efficiency of microelectronic systems have been extensive and continuous over the past few decades. Evidence of this can be seen even before the expansion of the space program by the United States in 1961 and the race to the moon; one of the first settings where size was truly limited and miniaturization of electronics was a necessity. In the 1950's the world saw its first major size reduction of electronic component with the phase out of the vacuum tube in favor of the transistor. The transistor saw its first major commercial use in 1952 via hybrid vacuum tube transistor technology. While many industries benefitted from the shift, in 1954 the hearing aid industry specifically experienced major improvements owing to the implementation of transistors, becoming smaller, requiring less power and having better functionality. The first 4-transistor AM radio product followed shortly thereafter. Much of today's effort since 1978 has been driven by the telecommunications industry that has succeeded in reducing cell phone size while simultaneously increasing functionality. Just as in the 1950's, hearing aid technology continues to be at the forefront when it comes to miniaturization. The hearing aid business has always had the need to use extremely small electronic packaging. The first completely in the canal (CIC) hearing aids were produced in 1993 and required all electronic components to be small enough that they fit entirely inside the ear canal. The introduction of wireless systems into hearing aids has sharply increased component count. Due to the size and shape of a multitude of types of hearing aids, flexible circuits need to be folded and bent to fit inside hearing aid cases, with essentially all available space being used. More powerful processors and more memory are enabling sophisticated algorithms that are able to greatly improve sound quality. There is also a strong market desire to add more features to hearing products while at the same time making them smaller and less visible. The latest hearing aids have succeeded in the later demand, constructed so small they are not visible and consequently are called invisible in the canal (IIC). In order to continue meeting the markets want for smaller and more features, a new packaging method needed to be developed. One such option is embedded die packaging. This paper will examine the use of embedded die packaging (or chip-in-flex) to drive significant further size reduction in custom and standard hearing instruments over what can be achieved using chip-on-flex or traditional ceramic hybrid based technologies. The historical drivers, available circuit board technologies, use of integrated passive devices, performance improvement, size reduction, device reliability, changes in supply chain, impact on wafer test, impact on device test, and challenges of working with wafers instead of die will be discussed.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (1) ◽  
pp. 000152-000157
Author(s):  
Susie Johansson ◽  
John Dzarnoski

Miniaturization of everyday products has been driving sales for some time and continues to fuel the consumer market. Everyone expects size reduction with each new product generation [1], [2]. Almost everything has electronics inside that must get smaller. There is no market demanding smaller devices that are faster, more capable, more feature-rich than that of the hearing aid industry. While radios, Bluetooth wireless systems and other accessories are added to hearing instruments feature lists, the consumer nonetheless continues to wish for them to be even smaller. Advancements in circuit fabrication, component shrinkage and die consolidation have aided the industry in satisfying this need. However, as this demand continues and even intensifies, current surface mount device assembly materials are becoming inadequate and the limiting factor for overall circuit size reduction; specifically, the die attachment, protection and reinforcement process is limiting how small hearing aid circuits can be. For hearing aids, the addition of more features and connection to more accessories each require a number of integrated circuits and associated passives attached to a flexible circuit. These circuits are invariably bent and twisted during assembly, up to 180°, requiring the integrated circuit solder joints to be reinforced by underfilling to prevent detachment. Unfortunately, the underfilling process is time-consuming and the capillary action necessary for its success is finicky. Even more unfavorably, a designated “keep out” area for other components must surround the die to be underfilled to allow for the dispensing equipment to access the die, reducing the useable board space and limiting the overall possibility of circuit size reduction. Additionally, the underfill material must stay away from circuit board edges and areas to be bent during final assembly. In an attempt to increase useable circuit board space, decrease overall circuit board size, and reduce assembly steps, the application of two epoxy flux materials for die attach fluxing and underfilling of hearing aids was evaluated. Epoxy flux is a relatively new material, which combines the functionality of flux and underfill into a single step. Epoxy flux's application, while eliminating steps, would more significantly eliminate the necessary “keep out” areas around die and allow for more densely placed surface mount components. The epoxy flux materials were applied by both printing and dipping, and then evaluated using x-ray imaging, scanning acoustic microscope imaging, die peel testing, multiple reflow integrity testing and die shear testing.


2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (04) ◽  
pp. 324-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Meibos ◽  
Karen Muñoz ◽  
Karl White ◽  
Elizabeth Preston ◽  
Cache Pitt ◽  
...  

Background: Early identification of hearing loss has led to routine fitting of hearing aids in infants and young children. Amplification provides opportunities to optimize child development, although it also introduces challenges for parents to navigate. Audiologists have a central role in providing parents with support to achieve effective management strategies and habits. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore current practices of pediatric audiologists who work with children birth to 5 yr of age, regarding their support of parent learning in achieving effective hearing aid management, identify existing gaps in service delivery, and to determine if audiologists were receptive to receiving training related to effective approaches to provide counseling and support to parents. Research Design: A cross-sectional, population-based survey was used. Study Sample: Three hundred and forty-nine surveys were analyzed from pediatric audiologists who provided services to children birth to 5 yr of age. Responses were received from 22 states in the United States. Data Collection and Analysis: Responses were collected through the mail and online. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the information. Results: More than half (61%) of the audiologists in the study had been providing pediatric hearing aid services to children birth to 5 yr of age for >10 yr. Of the audiologists who reported monitoring hours of hearing aid use, the majority reported that they used data logging (90%). More than half of the audiologists (57%) who shared data logging with parents reported that they encountered defensiveness from parents when addressing hearing aid use. Information and skills that were not routinely provided by one-third to one-half of the audiologists included the following: how to get access to loaner hearing aids (30%), available hearing aid options/accessories (33%), available financial assistance (36%), how to teach hearing aid management to other caregivers (38%), how to do hearing aid maintenance (44%), and how to do a Ling 6 sound check (52%). Many audiologists reported they did not frequently collaborate with speech-language pathologists (48%), early interventionists (47%), or physicians (68%). More than half of the audiologists indicated a desire for more training in counseling skills, for all 14 items queried, to support parents with hearing aid management (53–79%), regardless of their previous training experience. Conclusions: For young children with hearing loss to achieve optimal benefit from auditory experiences for speech and language development, they need evidence-based, comprehensive, and coordinated hearing aid management. Audiologists have an important role for teaching information and skills related to hearing aids, supporting parent learning, and collaborating with other providers. Pediatric audiologists in this study recognized and desired the need for further training in counseling skills that can better prepare them to meet the emotional needs of parents in the hearing aid management process.


Open Medicine ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasha Sooful ◽  
Catherine Dijk ◽  
Carina Avenant

AbstractThis study is aimed to examine the maintenance and utilisation of hearing aids given to clients attending government hospitals in Tshwane and to probe factors that impacted on the hearing aid fitting process, in order to contribute to the formation of service delivery guidelines. As most participants were embarrassed to wear their devices, results showed that there was a general consensus about the self-image and wearing of hearing aids. Furthermore, it was found that most government fitted hearing aids and accessories were poorly cared for and maintained. One of the factors which negatively influenced the utilisation and maintenance of hearing aids was finance. Participants could not afford to properly maintain and service their hearing instruments. Multilingualism also presented an obstacle in terms of utilising hearing aids correctly and to their full benefit, as most participants were not instructed on hearing aid care and use in their first language. Furthermore, distance to and from the provincial hospitals also posed a problem for clients living in rural and outlying areas.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (01) ◽  
pp. 005-016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Muñoz ◽  
Kristina Blaiser ◽  
Karianne Barwick

Background: Children born with permanent hearing loss have the opportunity to receive services earlier as a result of newborn hearing screening (NHS). We conducted a survey to address three aspects within the early hearing detection and intervention (EHDI) process: (1) timeliness of service delivery, (2) hearing device access, and (3) hearing aid management. Parent experiences provide valuable information in identifying existing challenges for these components of the EHDI system. Purpose: The aim was to investigate parent experiences as they access and manage hearing aids for their child. Research Design: A cross-sectional, population-based survey was used. Study Sample: Three hundred fifty-two completed surveys from parents of children born between 1977 and 2010 were returned from 45 states in the United States. Data Collection and Analysis: Responses were obtained online and through the mail, and were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Over time, the age of hearing loss identification has decreased to a median of 2 mo, age of first hearing aid fitting has decreased to a median of 5 mo, and the delay between hearing loss identification and hearing aid fitting has remained the same with a median of 2 mo. For children born between 2007 and 2010, the top three challenges parents reported in obtaining hearing aids were (1) paying for hearing aids, (2) accepting the need for hearing aids, and (3) wait time for an appointment. Almost one-half (48%) of the parents reported that they did not receive adequate support from their audiologist in how to check the function of their child's hearing aids. Conclusions: Significant progress has been made over the past two decades in reducing the age of hearing loss identification and hearing aid fitting for children who do not pass the NHS. However, many children continue to experience delays between hearing loss diagnosis and hearing aid fitting that exceed Joint Committee on Infant Hearing recommendations. The experiences parents reported provide valuable information about areas that need further investigation to improve the process for children with hearing loss.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 (DPC) ◽  
pp. 002104-002130
Author(s):  
John Dzarnoski ◽  
Kexia Sun

There has been enormous worldwide effort to increase the volumetric efficiency of electronic packaging. Much of this effort has been driven by the telecommunications industry that has succeeded in reducing cell phone size while simultaneously increasing functionality. The hearing aid business has always had the need to use extremely small electronic packaging because hearing aids pack electronics into the ear canal. In recent years hearing aid microelectronic packaging has moved from ceramic hybrid based packaging to a flexible circuit based technology. Due to the size and shape of all types of hearing aids, flexible circuits need to be folding and bent to fit inside hearing aid cases. In order to reduce space, bends and folds are pushing conventional wisdom on the limits of mechanical integrity. There is little published information regarding bendability of multilayer flexible circuits for class I medical device applications. This paper will examine bending and folding effects on a Polyimide/Adhesive/Copper/Polyimide/Copper/Adhesive/Polyimide structural stack-up on a test coupon and a HDI flexible circuit. A forming tool that controls every aspect of bend testing will be discussed. A variety of factors were investigated including bend angle, thickness of the circuit, bend radius, foil weight, copper materials, construction, and frequency of flexing. The circuit electrical resistance, microstructure and crack initiation were monitored during the process and will be examined. Failure mechanisms will be discussed as well as their impact on design.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 000325-000330
Author(s):  
John Dzarnoski ◽  
Susie Johansson

There has been continuous worldwide effort to increase the volumetric efficiency of electronic packaging. Much of this effort has been driven by the telecommunications industry that has succeeded in reducing cell phone size while simultaneously increasing functionality. The hearing aid business has always had the need to use extremely small electronic packaging because hearing aids pack electronics into the ear canal. The first commercial product using the transistor in 1952 was a hybrid vacuum tube-transistor hearing instrument. Today's hearing aids, such as Starkey's 3-Series product, have significant computing power and run complex hearing algorithms that have enormous impact on a patient's quality of life. The industry trend is to put more memory, more signal processing capability and more wireless capability into hearing aids to increase functionality and to improve performance. In order to achieve this increase in performance, the hearing business has had to develop and execute 3D packaging well ahead of other industries. This paper will examine the history of ceramic hybrid packaging at Starkey. The challenges and drivers for major technology steps will be addressed. The following technical advancements, transitions, considerations and limitations will be examined: changing ASIC technologies, impact of chip metallization, solder interconnect temperature hierarchy, impact of RoHS legislation, overcoming routing design limits, miniaturization realized by flip chip attach, impact of chip stacking on size, migration to stacked thick film ceramic interconnect layers using vertical interconnect channels, advances in thick film materials to support higher interconnect density, and incorporation of integrated passive devices.


2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (08) ◽  
pp. 515-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Julstrom ◽  
Linda Kozma-Spytek ◽  
Scott Isabelle

Background: In the development of the requirements for telecoil-compatible magnetic signal sources for wireless and cordless telephones to be specified in the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C63.19 and ANSI/Telecommunications Industry Association–1083 compatibility standards, it became evident that additional data concerning in-the-field telecoil use and subjective preferences were needed. Purpose: Primarily, the magnetic signal levels and, secondarily, the field orientations required for effective and comfortable telecoil use with wireless and cordless handsets needed further characterization. (A companion article addresses user signal-to-noise needs and preferences.) Research Design: Test subjects used their own hearing aids, which were addressed with both a controlled acoustic speech source and a controlled magnetic speech source. Each subject's hearing aid was first measured to find the telecoil's magnetic field orientation for maximum response, and an appropriate large magnetic head-worn coil was selected to apply the magnetic signal. Subjects could control the strength of the magnetic signal, first to match the loudness of a reference acoustic signal and then to find their Most Comfortable Level (MCL). The subjective judgments were compared against objective in-ear probe tube level measurements. Study Sample: The 57 test subjects covered an age range of 22 to 79 yr, with a self-reported hearing loss duration of 12 to 72 yr. All had telecoils that they used for at least some telecommunications needs. The self-reported degree of hearing loss ranged from moderate to profound. A total of 69 hearing aids were surveyed for their telecoil orientation. Data Collection and Analysis: A guided intake questionnaire yielded general background information for each subject. A custom-built test jig enabled hearing aid telecoil orientation within the aid to be determined. By comparing this observation with the in-use hearing aid position, the in-use orientation for each telecoil was determined. A custom-built test control box fed by prepared speech recordings from computer files enabled the tester to switch between acoustic and magnetic speech signals and to read and record the subject's selected magnetic level settings. Results: The overwhelming majority of behind-the-ear aids tested exhibited in-use telecoil orientations that were substantially vertical. An insufficient number of participants used in-the-ear aids to be able to draw general conclusions concerning the telecoil orientations of this style aid. The subjects showed a generally consistent preference for telecoil speech levels that subjectively matched the level that they heard from 65 dB SPL acoustic speech. The magnetic level needed to achieve their MCL, however, varied over a 30 dB range. Conclusions: Producing the necessary magnetic field strengths from a wireless or cordless telephone's handset in an in-use vertical orientation is vital for compatibility with the vast majority of behind-the-ear aids. Due to the very wide range of preferred magnetic signal levels shown, only indirect conclusions can be drawn concerning required signal levels. The strong preference for a 65 dB SPL equivalent level can be combined with established standards addressing hearing aid performance to derive reasonable source level requirements. Greater consistency between in-the-field hearing aid telecoil and microphone sensitivity adjustments could yield improved results for some users.


2013 ◽  
Vol 24 (03) ◽  
pp. 192-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Line V. Knudsen ◽  
Claus Nielsen ◽  
Sophia E. Kramer ◽  
Lesley Jones ◽  
Ariane Laplante-Lévesque

Background: The uptake and use of hearing aids is low compared to the prevalence of hearing impairment. People who seek help and take part in a hearing aid rehabilitation process participate actively in this process in several ways. Purpose: In order to gain more knowledge on the challenges of hearing help-seeking and hearing aid use, this qualitative study sought to understand the ways that people with hearing impairment describe themselves as active participants throughout the hearing aid rehabilitation process. Research Design: In this qualitative interview study we examined the hearing rehabilitation process from the perspective of the hearing impaired. In this article we describe how the qualitative interview material was interpreted by a pragmatic qualitative thematic analysis. The analysis described in this article focused on the efforts, initiatives, actions, and participation the study participants described that they had engaged in during their rehabilitation. Study Sample: Interviews were conducted with people with hearing impairment in Australia, Denmark, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The 34 interview participants were distributed equally between the sites, just as men and women were almost equally represented (56% women). The average age of the participants was 64. All participants had a hearing impairment in at least one ear. The participants were recruited to represent a range of experiences with hearing help-seeking and rehabilitation. Data Collection and Analysis: With each participant one qualitative semistructured interview ranging between 1 and 2 hr was carried out. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, read through several times, and themes were identified, defined, and reviewed by an iterative process. Results: From this thematic focus a concept called “client labor” has emerged. Client labor contains nine subthemes divided into three overarching groups: cognitive labor, emotional labor, and physical labor. The participants' experiences and meaning-making related to these conceptual types of efforts is described. Conclusions: The study findings have implications for the clinical encounter between people with hearing impairment and hearing health-care professionals. We suggest that a patient-centered approach that bears in mind the client's active participation could help toward improving clinical dispensing, fitting, and counseling practices with the end goal to increase hearing aid benefit and satisfaction.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (08) ◽  
pp. 718-730 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Caballero ◽  
Karen Muñoz ◽  
Karl White ◽  
Lauri Nelson ◽  
Melanie Domenech-Rodriguez ◽  
...  

AbstractHearing aid fitting in infancy has become more common in the United States as a result of earlier identification of hearing loss. Consistency of hearing aid use is an area of concern for young children, as well as other hearing aid management challenges parents encounter that may contribute to less-than-optimal speech and language outcomes. Research that describes parent hearing aid management experiences of Spanish-speaking Hispanic families, or the extent of their needs, is not available. To effectively support parent learning, in a culturally sensitive manner, providers may benefit from having a better understanding of the needs and challenges Hispanic families experience with hearing aid management.The purpose of the current study was to describe challenges with hearing aid management and use for children from birth to 5 yr of age, as reported by Spanish-speaking parents in the United States, and factors that may influence hearing aid use.This study used a cross-sectional survey design.Forty-two Spanish-speaking parents of children up to 5 yr of age who had been fitted with hearing aids.Responses were obtained from surveys mailed to parents through early intervention programs and audiology clinics. Descriptive statistics were used to describe frequencies and variance in responses.Forty-seven percent of the parents reported the need for help from an interpreter during audiology appointments. Even though parents received information and were taught skills by their audiologist, many wanted to receive more information. For example, 59% wanted to know how to meet other parents of children who have hearing loss, although 88% had previously received this information; 56% wanted to know how to do basic hearing aid maintenance, although 71% had previously received instruction. The two most frequently reported hearing aid use challenges were fear of losing the hearing aids, and not seeing benefit from the hearing aids. Hearing aid use during all waking hours was reported by more parents (66%) when their child had a good day than when their child had a bad day (37%); during the previous two weeks, 35% of the parents indicated their child had all good days.Hispanic parents wanted more comprehensive information, concrete resources, and emotional support from the audiologist to overcome hearing aid management challenges. Understanding parents’ perspectives, experiences, and challenges is critical for audiologists to provide appropriate support in a culturally sensitive manner and to effectively address families’ needs.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caitlyn R. Ritter1 ◽  
Brittan Ann Barker ◽  
Kristina Scharp

Hearing aids are an effective treatment for individuals with hearing loss that have been shown to dampen (and sometime ameliorate) the negative effects of hearing loss. Despite the devices’ efficacy, many reject hearing aids as a form of treatment. In the present qualitative study, we explored the reasons for hearing aid non-use in the United States that emerged from the stories of adults with hearing loss who do not to utilize hearing aids. We specifically used thematic analysis in concert with an attribution theory framework to identify and analyze recurring themes and reasons throughout these individuals’ narratives. A total of nine themes describing reasons of hearing aid non-use emerged. Four reasons were internally motivated: (1) non-necessity, (2) stigmatization, (3) lack of integration into daily living, and (4) unreadiness due to lack of education; five reasons were externally motivated: (5) discomfort, (6) financial setback, (7) burden, (8) professional distrust, and (9) priority setting. These findings contribute to the field of hearing healthcare by providing professionals with insight into reasons that people across the provided when recounting their experiences following the diagnosis of hearing loss, prescription for hearing aids, and their hearing aid non-use. These findings are an important step toward the development of more effective, person-centered hearing healthcare that can best address these individuals’ concerns and expectations surrounding hearing loss and hearing aids.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document