scholarly journals Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate From Serum Creatinine in the General Population

2007 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 385-386
Author(s):  
Jeffrey T. Cohen
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
General Population ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Filtration Rate

Limitations of Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate From Serum Creatinine in the General Population

2006 ◽  
Vol 81 (11) ◽  
pp. 1427-1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Rule ◽  
Richard J. Rodeheffer ◽  
Timothy S. Larson ◽  
John C. Burnett ◽  
Fernando G. Cosio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
General Population ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Filtration Rate

scholarly journals Serum NGAL, BNP, PTH, and albumin do not improve glomerular filtration rate estimating formulas in children

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Mouron-Hryciuk ◽  
François Cachat ◽  
Paloma Parvex ◽  
Thomas Perneger ◽  
Hassib Chehade
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Parathyroid Hormone ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Brain Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Cystatin C ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Neutrophil Gelatinase Associated Lipocalin ◽  
Neutrophil Gelatinase

AbstractGlomerular filtration rate (GFR) is difficult to measure, and estimating formulas are notorious for lacking precision. This study aims to assess if the inclusion of additional biomarkers improves the performance of eGFR formulas. A hundred and sixteen children with renal diseases were enrolled. Data for age, weight, height, inulin clearance (iGFR), serum creatinine, cystatin C, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), parathyroid hormone (PTH), albumin, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were collected. These variables were added to the revised and combined (serum creatinine and cystatin C) Schwartz formulas, and the quadratic and combined quadratic formulas. We calculated the adjusted r-square (r2) in relation to iGFR and tested the improvement in variance explained by means of the likelihood ratio test. The combined Schwartz and the combined quadratic formulas yielded best results with an r2 of 0.676 and 0.730, respectively. The addition of BNP and PTH to the combined Schwartz and quadratic formulas improved the variance slightly. NGAL and albumin failed to improve the prediction of GFR further. These study results also confirm that the addition of cystatin C improves the performance of estimating GFR formulas, in particular the Schwartz formula.Conclusion: The addition of serum NGAL, BNP, PTH, and albumin to the combined Schwartz and quadratic formulas for estimating GFR did not improve GFR prediction in our population. What is Known:• Estimating glomerular filtration rate (GFR) formulas include serum creatinine and/or cystatin C but lack precision when compared to measured GFR.• The serum concentrations of some biological parameters such as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), parathyroid hormone (PTH), albumin, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) vary with the level of renal function. What is New:• The addition of BNP and PTH to the combined quadratic formula improved its performance only slightly. NGAL and albumin failed to improve the prediction of GFR further.

Pathogenesis and Assessment of Renal Function in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis

Folia Medica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 5-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilyana H. Teneva
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Meld Score ◽  
Kidney Damage ◽  
Early Assessment

Abstract In liver cirrhosis patients awaiting liver transplantation, it is prognostically equally important to assess the renal function before and after transplantation. This is evidenced by the inclusion of serum creatinine in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. Most of the causes of renal failure in liver cirrhosis are functional, the acute kidney damage including prerenal azotemia, acute tubular necrosis and hepatorenal syndrome. A major index of the renal function, the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is determined in a specific way in patients with liver cirrhosis. Clinically, serum creatinine is considered the best indicator of kidney function, although it is rather unreliable when it comes to early assessment of renal dysfunction. Most of the patients with liver cirrhosis have several concomitant conditions, which are the reason for the false low creatinine levels, even in the presence of moderate to severe kidney damage. This also holds for the creatinine clearance and creatinine-based estimation equations for assessment of the glomerular filtration rate (the Cockroft-Gault and MDRD formulas), which overestimate the real glomerular filtration. Clearance of exogenous markers is considered a gold standard, but the methods for their determination are rather costly and hard to apply. Alternative serum markers (e.g., cystatin C) have been used, but they should be better studied in cases of liver cirrhosis assessment.

Abstract 13433: Predictors of Contrast Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes and Normal Baseline Glomerular Filtration Rate

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Negreanu ◽  
Michael Gagnon ◽  
anh nguyen ◽  
Samer Mansour ◽  
Michel T Nguyen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndromes ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Contrast Induced Nephropathy ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Coronary Syndromes ◽  
The Mean

Background: The incidence and predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients with normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are not well ascertained. We aim to determine the incidence and predictors for CIN after coronary catheterization (CATH) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Methods: We combined the datasets of two studies. The AMI-QUEBEC was an observational cohort of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions in 2003. The AMI-OPTIMA was a study of patients hospitalized with ACS in 2009 and 2012. For this analysis, we retained only patients with GFR > 60 ml/min who underwent CATH. We defined “hyperfiltrators” as patients with GFR above the 95th percentile age and sex-adjusted value. CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine >0.5 mg/dL (44.2 μmols/L) or > 50% from baseline serum creatinine. Results: There were 3,188 patients with GFR > 60 ml/min : 39 hyperfiltrators and 3,149 without hyperfiltration. The mean age was similar between the two groups of patients (62 years); 21% and 27% females in hyperfiltrators and non-hyperfiltrators (p<0.0001). The prevalences of diabetes mellitus and hypertension were 36% and 64%, respectively in hyperfiltrators compared to 20% and 46%, respectively in non-hyperfiltrators. The mean baseline GFR and creatinine were 112 ml/min and 50 μmols/L, respectively in hyperfiltrators; 84.2 ml/min and 80 μmols/L in non-hyperfiltrators. There were 225 CIN following CATH; 7.1% of the whole cohort with 35.9% in the hyperfiltrators and 6.7% in non-hyperfiltrators. Hyperfiltration was independently associated with a 13-fold increase in the risk of CIN (Table 1). Each year of increase in age was associated with a 5% increase in the risk of CIN. Shock was also associated with an 11-fold increase in the risk of CIN. Conclusion: Hyperfiltrators may be at high risk of CIN following CATH in ACS. The risk of CIN associated with hyperfiltration should be evaluated in other populations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document