scholarly journals Computable categoricity versus relative computable categoricity

2013 ◽  
Vol 221 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney G. Downey ◽  
Asher M. Kach ◽  
Steffen Lempp ◽  
Daniel D. Turetsky
2015 ◽  
Vol 268 ◽  
pp. 423-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney G. Downey ◽  
Asher M. Kach ◽  
Steffen Lempp ◽  
Andrew E.M. Lewis-Pye ◽  
Antonio Montalbán ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Rodney G. Downey ◽  
Matthew Harrison-Trainor ◽  
Alexander Melnikov

2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 535-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Cenzer ◽  
Geoffrey Laforte ◽  
Jeffrey Remmel

AbstractWe examine the effective categoricity of equivalence structures via Ershov's difference hierarchy. We explore various kinds of categoricity available by distinguishing three different notions of isomorphism available in this hierarchy. We prove several results relating our notions of categoricity to computable equivalence relations: for example, we show that, for such relations, computable categoricity is equivalent to our notion of weak ω-c.e. categoricity, and that -categoricity is equivalent to our notion of graph-ω-c.e. categoricity.


2008 ◽  
Vol 156 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bakhadyr Khoussainov ◽  
Frank Stephan ◽  
Yue Yang

2005 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 151-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steffen Lempp ◽  
Charles McCoy ◽  
Russell Miller ◽  
Reed Solomon

AbstractWe characterize the structure of computably categorical trees of finite height, and prove that our criterion is both necessary and sufficient. Intuitively, the characterization is easiest to express in terms of isomorphisms of (possibly infinite) trees, but in fact it is equivalent to a -condition. We show that all trees which are not computably categorical have computable dimension ω. Finally, we prove that for every n ≥ 1 in ω, there exists a computable tree of finite height which is Σ30-categorical but not Δn3-categorical


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document