scholarly journals Outcomes of dental implant treatment in patients with generalized aggressive periodontitis: a systematic review

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyoung-Kyu Kim ◽  
Hun-Mo Sung
Author(s):  
Dandan Song ◽  
Sohaib Shujaat ◽  
Politis Constantinus ◽  
Kaan Orhan ◽  
Reinhilde Jacobs

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (10) ◽  
pp. 1398-1407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Monje ◽  
Gil Alcoforado ◽  
Miguel Padial-Molina ◽  
Fernando Suarez ◽  
Guo-Hao Lin ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 523-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Peter Strietzel ◽  
Peter A. Reichart ◽  
Abhijit Kale ◽  
Milind Kulkarni ◽  
Brigitte Wegner ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Judd Sher ◽  
Kate Kirkham-Ali ◽  
Denny Luo ◽  
Catherine Miller ◽  
Dileep Sharma

The present systematic review evaluates the safety of placing dental implants in patients with a history of antiresorptive or antiangiogenic drug therapy. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and OpenGrey databases were used to search for clinical studies (English only) to July 16, 2019. Study quality was assessed regarding randomization, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other biases using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist for case series. A broad search strategy resulted in the identification of 7542 studies. There were 28 studies reporting on bisphosphonates (5 cohort, 6 case control, and 17 case series) and one study reporting on denosumab (case series) that met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. The quality assessment revealed an overall moderate quality of evidence among the studies. Results demonstrated that patients with a history of bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis are not at increased risk of implant failure in terms of osseointegration. However, all patients with a history of bisphosphonate treatment, whether taken orally for osteoporosis or intravenously for malignancy, appear to be at risk of ‘implant surgery-triggered’ MRONJ. In contrast, the risk of MRONJ in patients treated with denosumab for osteoporosis was found to be negligible. In conclusion, general and specialist dentists should exercise caution when planning dental implant therapy in patients with a history of bisphosphonate and denosumab drug therapy. Importantly, all patients with a history of bisphosphonates are at risk of MRONJ, necessitating this to be included in the informed consent obtained prior to implant placement. The James Cook University College of Medicine and Dentistry Honours program and the Australian Dental Research Foundation Colin Cormie Grant were the primary sources of funding for this systematic review.


Author(s):  
Titus Lalith Antony P ◽  
Balaji Ganesh S ◽  
Jothi Priya A

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. e38-e46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier Ata-Ali ◽  
Fadi Ata-Ali ◽  
David Peñarrocha-Oltra ◽  
Pablo Galindo-Moreno

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan Yuan ◽  
Qiu-Chan Xiong ◽  
Megha Gupta ◽  
Rosa María López-Pintor ◽  
Xiao-Lei Chen ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 789-801 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rejane Faria Ribeiro-Rotta ◽  
Christina Lindh ◽  
Andrea Castro Pereira ◽  
Madeleine Rohlin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document