scholarly journals Effectiveness and Safety of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Delivery during Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Acute Respiratory Failure Patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Jin Kim ◽  
Chi Young Jung ◽  
Kyung Chan Kim
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Bronchoalveolar Lavage ◽  
Oxygen Delivery ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula

Implementation of bronchoalveolar lavage using a high-flow nasal cannula in five cases of acute respiratory failure

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 310-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuya Miyagi ◽  
Shusaku Haranaga ◽  
Futoshi Higa ◽  
Masao Tateyama ◽  
Jiro Fujita
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Bronchoalveolar Lavage ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula

High‐flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure in a non‐intensive geriatric setting

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 1652-1653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Luca Fimognari ◽  
Massimo Rizzo ◽  
Olga Cuccurullo ◽  
Giovanna Cristiano ◽  
Roberto Ricchio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula

scholarly journals High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure at Emergency Departments: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 1508-1514
Author(s):  
Nicolas Marjanovic ◽  
Jérémy Guénézan ◽  
Jean-Pierre Frat ◽  
Olivier Mimoz ◽  
Arnaud W. Thille
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Emergency Departments ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula

scholarly journals The Impact of High-Flow Nasal Cannula on the Outcome of Immunocompromised Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 693 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng ◽  
Chang ◽  
Wang ◽  
Hsiao ◽  
Lai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
Immunocompromised Patients ◽  
Intubation Rate ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
And Control

Background and objectives: High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) can be used as a respiratory support strategy for patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). However, no clear evidence exists to support or oppose HFNC use in immunocompromised patients. Thus, this meta-analysis aims to assess the effects of HFNC, compared to conventional oxygen therapy (COT) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV), on the outcomes in immunocompromised patients with ARF. The Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched up to November 2018. Materials and Methods: Only clinical studies comparing the effect of HFNC with COT or NIV for immunocompromised patients with ARF were included. The outcome included the rate of intubation, mortality and length of stay (LOS). Results: A total of eight studies involving 1433 immunocompromised patients with ARF were enrolled. The pooled analysis showed that HFNC was significantly associated with a reduced intubation rate (risk ratio (RR), 0.83; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.74–0.94, I2 = 0%). Among subgroup analysis, HFNC was associated with a lower intubation rate than COT (RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75–0.95, I2 = 0%) and NIV (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40–0.86, I2 = 0%), respectively. However, there was no significant difference between HFNC and control groups in terms of 28-day mortality (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58–1.04, I2 = 48%), and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality (RR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73–1.05, I2 = 57%). The ICU and hospital LOS were similar between HFNC and control groups (ICU LOS: mean difference, 0.49 days; 95% CI, −0.25–1.23, I2 = 69%; hospital LOS: mean difference, −0.12 days; 95% CI, −1.86–1.61, I2 = 64%). Conclusions: Use of HFNC may decrease the intubation rate in immunocompromised patients with ARF compared with the control group, including COT and NIV. However, HFNC could not provide additional survival benefit or shorten the LOS. Further large, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy to treat patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure consequent to SARS-CoV-2 infection

Thorax ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 998-1000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Vianello ◽  
Giovanna Arcaro ◽  
Beatrice Molena ◽  
Cristian Turato ◽  
Andi Sukthi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Respiratory Failure ◽  
Acute Respiratory Failure ◽  
High Flow ◽  
Nasal Cannula ◽  
High Flow Nasal Cannula ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Hypoxemic Acute Respiratory Failure

This observational study aims to assess the outcome and safety of O2-therapy by high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in 28 consecutive patients with severe hypoxemic acute respiratory failure (hARF) consequent to SARS-CoV-2 infection, unresponsive to conventional O2-therapy. Nineteen patients had a positive response. Nine patients required escalation of treatment to non-invasive ventilation (five subsequently intubated). None of the staff had a positive swab testing during the study period and the following 14 days. Severity of hypoxemia and C reactive protein level were correlated with HFNC failure. These data suggest HFNC to be a safe treatment for less severe patients with SARS-CoV-2 hARF and efficacy will need to be assessed as part of a clinical trial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document