Microseismic Monitoring Improves Hydraulic Fracturing Diagnostic and Optimizes Field Development in Western Desert, Egypt

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Salah ◽  
Ahmed Bereak ◽  
Mohamed A. Gabry ◽  
Taner Batmaz ◽  
Mohamed El-Sebaee ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. SH39-SH48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Gajek ◽  
Jacek Trojanowski ◽  
Michał Malinowski ◽  
Marek Jarosiński ◽  
Marko Riedel

A precise velocity model is necessary to obtain reliable locations of microseismic events, which provide information about the effectiveness of the hydraulic stimulation. Seismic anisotropy plays an important role in microseismic event location by imposing the dependency between wave velocities and its propagation direction. Building an anisotropic velocity model that accounts for that effect allows for more accurate location of microseismic events. We have used downhole microseismic records from a pilot hydraulic fracturing experiment in Lower-Paleozoic shale gas play in the Baltic Basin, Northern Poland, to obtain accurate microseismic events locations. We have developed a workflow for a vertical transverse isotropy velocity model construction when facing a challenging absence of horizontally polarized S-waves in perforation shot data, which carry information about Thomsen’s [Formula: see text] parameter and provide valuable constraints for locating microseismic events. We extract effective [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] for each layer from the P- and SV-wave arrivals of perforation shots, whereas the unresolved [Formula: see text] is retrieved afterward from the SH-SV-wave delay time of selected microseismic events. An inverted velocity model provides more reliable location of microseismic events, which then becomes an essential input for evaluating the hydraulic stimulation job effectiveness in the geomechanical context. We evaluate the influence of the preexisting fracture sets and obliquity between the borehole trajectory and principal horizontal stress direction on the hydraulic treatment performance. The fracturing fluid migrates to previously fractured zones, while the growth of the microseismic volume in consecutive stages is caused by increased penetration of the above-lying lithologic formations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aamir Lokhandwala ◽  
Vaibhav Joshi ◽  
Ankit Dutt

Abstract Hydraulic fracturing is a widespread well stimulation treatment in the oil and gas industry. It is particularly prevalent in shale gas fields, where virtually all production can be attributed to the practice of fracturing. It is also used in the context of tight oil and gas reservoirs, for example in deep-water scenarios where the cost of drilling and completion is very high; well productivity, which is dictated by hydraulic fractures, is vital. The correct modeling in reservoir simulation can be critical in such settings because hydraulic fracturing can dramatically change the flow dynamics of a reservoir. What presents a challenge in flow simulation due to hydraulic fractures is that they introduce effects that operate on a different length and time scale than the usual dynamics of a reservoir. Capturing these effects and utilizing them to advantage can be critical for any operator in context of a field development plan for any unconventional or tight field. This paper focuses on a study that was undertaken to compare different methods of simulating hydraulic fractures to formulate a field development plan for a tight gas field. To maintaing the confidentiality of data and to showcase only the technical aspect of the workflow, we will refer to the asset as Field A in subsequent sections of this paper. Field A is a low permeability (0.01md-0.1md), tight (8% to 12% porosity) gas-condensate (API ~51deg and CGR~65 stb/mmscf) reservoir at ~3000m depth. Being structurally complex, it has a large number of erosional features and pinch-outs. The study involved comparing analytical fracture modeling, explicit modeling using local grid refinements, tartan gridding, pseudo-well connection approach and full-field unconventional fracture modeling. The result of the study was to use, for the first time for Field A, a system of generating pseudo well connections to simulate hydraulic fractures. The approach was found to be efficient both terms of replicating field data for a 10 year period while drastically reducing simulation runtime for the subsequent 10 year-period too. It helped the subsurface team to test multiple scenarios in a limited time-frame leading to improved project management.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikhail Ivanovich Samoilov ◽  
Vladimir Nikolaevich Astafyev ◽  
Evgeny Faritovich Musin

Abstract The paper describes a system of approaches to the design and engineering support of multistage hydraulic fracturing: A method of developing multiple-option modular design of multistage hydraulic fracturing which is a tool for operational decision-making in the process of hydraulic fracturing.Building a Hydraulic Fracturing Designs Matrix when optimizing field development plans. The result was used to build decision maps for finding well completion methods and selecting a baseline hydraulic fracturing design. The paper also describes how the systematization of approaches, methodological developments, and decision templates can help in optimizing field development by drilling directional and horizontal wells followed by multi-stage hydraulic fracturing. The sequence of events and tasks that led to the development of the methodology, as well as its potential, is briefly described. The methodologies were developed during the execution of a hydraulic fracturing project at JK 29 reservoirs of the Tyumen Suite of Em-Yogovskoye field, after which they were applied in a number of other projects for the development of hard-to-recover hydrocarbon reserves in West Siberia.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Briner ◽  
Sergey Nadezdhin ◽  
Mahmoud El Gihani ◽  
Taimur Al-Wadhahi ◽  
Yasin Charles El-Taha ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document