Friction Pressure Losses of Fluids Flowing in Circular Conduits

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Hosny Ahmed Kamel ◽  
Ali S. Shaqlaih
Author(s):  
А.В. Саврико ◽  
С.Н. Лымич ◽  
К.В. Кружаев ◽  
В.С. Левин ◽  
А.В. Москвичев

Приведено исследование зависимости газодинамических характеристик стенда от применяемого материала трубопровода. Oсновополагающими факторами, влияющими на работоспособность стенда, являются выходные параметры - давление и расход рабочего тела, которые напрямую зависят от потерь давления на трение, создаваемого элементами стенда. Для оценки степени влияния материалов на потери стенда выбраны два вида труб: полипропиленовые и металлические. Аналитические расчёты потери давления рассматриваемых трубопроводов из различного материала показали, что трубопроводы из полипропилена предпочтительнее. Однако при проведении эксперимента получены противоположные данные, которые показали, что в полипропиленовых магистралях возможно присутствие значительного количества диафрагм: в местах пайки труб, образовавшихся в процессе изготовления. Именно этот факт способствует существенному повышению значений сопротивлений в полипропиленовых трубопроводах на 20 % по сравнению со стальными трубами, где диафрагмы отсутствуют. В результате проведения исследования был введен коэффициент, учитывающий влияние диафрагм полипропиленового трубопровода при аналитическом расчете на сопротивление. Для сохранения более точных снимаемых значений с газодинамических стендов целесообразнее использовать трубопроводы из металла, в которых рассчитать потери возможно с отклонениями до 3 % Here we give the study of the dependence of the gas-dynamic characteristics of the stand on the pipeline material used. The fundamental factors affecting the performance of the stand are the output parameters-the pressure and flow rate of the working fluid, which directly depend on the friction pressure losses created by the elements of the stand. To assess the degree of influence of materials on the losses of the stand, we selected two types of pipes: polypropylene and metal. Analytical calculations of the pressure loss of the considered pipelines made of various materials have shown that pipelines made of polypropylene are preferable. However, during the experiment, we obtained the opposite data, which showed that a significant number of diaphragms may be present in polypropylene pipelines: in the places of soldering of pipes formed during the manufacturing process. This fact contributes to a significant increase in the resistance values in polypropylene pipelines by 20 % compared to steel pipes, where there are no diaphragms. As a result of the study, we introduced a coefficient that takes into account the influence of polypropylene pipeline diaphragms in the analytical calculation of resistance. To preserve more accurate values taken from gas-dynamic stands, it is more expedient to use metal pipelines in which it is possible to calculate losses with deviations of up to 3 %


2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunxu Zhou ◽  
Subhash N. Shah

The rheological properties and friction pressure losses of several common well-drilling, completion, and stimulation fluids have been investigated experimentally. These fluids include polymeric fluids—Xanthan gum, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (PHPA), guar gum, and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), bentonite drilling mud, oil-based drilling mud, and guar-based fracturing slurries. Rheological measurements using a Bohlin CS 50 rheometer and a model 35 Fann viscometer showed that these fluids exhibit shear thinning and thermal thinning behavior except the bentonite drilling mud whose viscosity increased as the temperature was raised. Flow experiments using a full-scale coiled tubing test facility showed that the friction pressure loss in coiled tubing is significantly higher than in straight tubing. Since the polymeric fluids displayed drag reducing property, their drag reduction behavior in straight and coiled tubings was analyzed and compared. Plots of drag reduction vs. generalized Reynolds number indicate that the drag reduction in coiled tubing was not affected by polymer concentration as much as in straight tubing. The onsets of turbulence and drag reduction in coiled tubing were significantly delayed as compared with straight tubing. The effect of solids content on the friction pressure losses in coiled tubing is also briefly discussed.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Zhou ◽  
S. N. Shah

The rheological properties and friction pressure losses of several fluids that are most commonly used as well drilling, completion, and stimulation fluids have been investigated experimentally. These fluids include polymeric fluids – Xanthan gum, partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (PHPA), guar gum, and hydroxyethyl cellulose (HEC), bentonite drilling mud, oil-based drilling mud, and guar-based fracturing slurries. Rheological measurements using a Bohlin CS 50 rheometer and a model 35 Fann viscometer showed that these fluids exhibit shear thinning and thermal thinning behavior except the bentonite drilling mud whose viscosity increased as the temperature was raised. Flow experiments using a full-scale coiled tubing test facility showed that the friction pressure loss in coiled tubing is significantly higher than in straight tubing. Since the polymeric fluids displayed drag reducing property, their drag reduction behavior in straight and coiled tubings was analyzed and compared. It was found that the drag reduction (DR) in coiled tubing is much lower than that in straight tubing. Plots of drag reduction vs. generalized Reynolds number indicate that the drag reduction in coiled tubing was not affected by polymer concentration as much as in straight tubing. The onsets of turbulence and drag reduction in coiled tubing were significantly delayed as compared with straight tubing. The effect of solids content on the friction pressure losses in coiled tubing is also briefly discussed.


Author(s):  
Mariia Serediuk ◽  

The peculiarities of gas-dynamic calculations of internal gas networks when using gas-hydrogen mixtures with a volume fraction of up to 20 % of hydrogen instead of natural gas have been established. Analytical dependences are obtained, which make it possible to estimate the increase in friction pressure losses and hydrostatic pressure in internal gas pipelines at increased costs, which compensate for the decrease in the heat of combustion of the hydrogen-gas mixture.


Author(s):  
Chinenye C. Ogugbue ◽  
Subhash N. Shah

Polymer fluids are utilized extensively in the petroleum industry for viscosity enhancement and friction pressure reduction during turbulent flow. Selection of the appropriate correlation for the desired fluid and flow regime is very important for the accurate determination of frictional pressure losses. A range of correlations has been published for predicting frictional losses under annular flow conditions. All these correlations are based on certain assumptions, which limit their application under different operating conditions. This paper presents the results of an experimental study carried out to develop a reliable frictional pressure loss correlation for polymeric solutions in a fully eccentric annulus. Fluids investigated include Water, Guar, Xanthan, and Welan gum under conditions typically encountered in drilling and completion operations. The frictional pressure losses of these polymeric fluids exhibiting drag-reducing characteristics are investigated and analyzed as a function of generalized Reynolds number for each fluid. The experimental set-up includes 200 ft of 1 1/2-in. straight tubing, and 200 ft of (3 1/2-in. × 1 3/4-in.) fully eccentric annuli. Data analysis enabled the development of an improved correlation for polymer solutions in a fully eccentric annulus. Fluids apparent viscosity at 511 sec−1, generalized Reynolds number, and diameter ratio, all of which can be easily determined in the field, were selected as independent variables for the new correlation. Experimental data show that the new correlation estimates friction pressure losses in fully eccentric annuli much better than previously published equations.


Equipment ◽  
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Sestak ◽  
V. Mik ◽  
J. Myska ◽  
M. Dostal ◽  
L. Mihalka

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document