Role and Contribution of Pressure Regime Evaluation in Well Planning and Formation Evaluation Process, Zeit Bay Field - Gulf of Suez, Egypt

<em>Formation evaluation is a part of petroleum engineering to study reservoir characteristics as well as issues related to success in the discovery of hydrocarbon reserves. Hydrocarbon reserves are influenced by reservoir rock characteristics consisting of porosity (f), water saturation (S<sub>w</sub>), and permeability (k.) In low resistivity regions are often found abnormalities in formation evaluation. The abnormality is a low resistivity value produced so that an inaccurate value obtained when water saturation is calculated. In this study, an evaluation process of the abnormality phenomena was performed on low resistivity areas. The evaluation is done by analyzing both log and core data. Evaluation in low resistivity areas aims to obtain a correction factor of the abnormality that occurs. Abnormalities in the calculation of resistivity values caused by the existence of conductive minerals which resulting in a decrease of the resistivity value of the formation. This correction factor can be used in Archie to calculate water saturations, therefore more accurate values of saturation were found.</em>

Download Full-text

Developing an Effective Framework for the Augmentative and Alternative Communication Evaluation Process

Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication ◽

10.1044/aac23.2.91 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 23 (2) ◽

pp. 91-98 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Celeste R. Helling ◽

Jamila Minga

Keyword(s):

Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽

Evaluation Process ◽

Assessment Process ◽

Diagnostic Tools ◽

Alternative Communication ◽

Complex Communication Needs ◽

Expressive Communication ◽

Communication Evaluation ◽

Communication Needs

A comprehensive augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) evaluation is critical to providing a viable means of expressive communication for nonverbal people with complex communication needs. Although a number of diagnostic tools are available to assist AAC practitioners with the assessment process, there is a need to tailor the evaluation process to the specific communication needs of the AAC user. The purpose of this paper is to provide a basis for developing an effective and clinically driven framework for approaching a user-tailored AAC evaluation process.

Download Full-text

AAC Decision-Making and Mobile Technology: Points to Ponder

Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication ◽

10.1044/aac23.2.104 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 23 (2) ◽

pp. 104-111 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Mary Ann Abbott ◽

Debby McBride

Keyword(s):

Decision Making ◽

Mobile Technology ◽

Communication System ◽

Augmentative And Alternative Communication ◽

Evaluation Process ◽

Decision Making Process ◽

Alternative Communication ◽

Ipod Touch ◽

Feature Match

The purpose of this article is to outline a decision-making process and highlight which portions of the augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) evaluation process deserve special attention when deciding which features are required for a communication system in order to provide optimal benefit for the user. The clinician then will be able to use a feature-match approach as part of the decision-making process to determine whether mobile technology or a dedicated device is the best choice for communication. The term mobile technology will be used to describe off-the-shelf, commercially available, tablet-style devices like an iPhone®, iPod Touch®, iPad®, and Android® or Windows® tablet.

Download Full-text

Pediatric Benign Vocal Fold Lesions: A Team Approach

Perspectives on Voice and Voice Disorders ◽

10.1044/vvd19.3.105 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 19 (3) ◽

pp. 105-112 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Geralyn Harvey Woodnorth ◽

Roger C. Nuss

Keyword(s):

Vocal Fold ◽

Evaluation Process ◽

Team Approach ◽

Speech Language Pathologist ◽

Benign Vocal Fold Lesions ◽

Different Types ◽

Team Evaluation ◽

Surgical Treatments ◽

Review Current ◽

Vocal Fold Nodules

Abstract Many children with dysphonia present with benign vocal fold lesions, including bilateral vocal fold nodules, cysts, vocal fold varices, and scarring. Evaluation and treatment of these children are best undertaken in a thoughtful and coordinated manner involving both the speech-language pathologist and the otolaryngologist. The goals of this article are (a) to describe the team evaluation process based on a “whole system” approach; (b) to discuss etiological factors and diagnosis; and (c) to review current medical, behavioral, and surgical treatments for children with different types of dysphonia.

Download Full-text

Impairment Tutorial: Spinal Cord Stimulation and Intraspinal Opioids:Impairment Rating Issues

Guides Newsletter ◽

10.1001/amaguidesnewsletters.2000.sepoct04 ◽

2000 ◽

Vol 5 (5) ◽

pp. 4-5

Author(s):

James B. Talmage ◽

Leon H. Ensalada

Keyword(s):

Medical Records ◽

Evaluation Process ◽

Current Approach ◽

Satisfaction Survey ◽

Start Time ◽

Medical Evaluation ◽

Independent Medical Evaluation ◽

Other Information ◽

Physician Reviews ◽

Written Informed Consent

Abstract Evaluators must understand the complex overall process that makes up an independent medical evaluation (IME), whether the purpose of the evaluation is to assess impairment or other care issues. Part 1 of this article provides an overview of the process, and Part 2 [in this issue] reviews the pre-evaluation process in detail. The IME process comprises three phases: pre-evaluation, evaluation, and postevaluation. Pre-evaluation begins when a client requests an IME and provides the physician with medical records and other information. The following steps occur at the time of an evaluation: 1) patient is greeted; arrival time is noted; 2) identity of the examinee is verified; 3) the evaluation process is explained and written informed consent is obtained; 4) questions or inventories are completed; 5) physician reviews radiographs or diagnostic studies; 6) physician records start time and interviews examinee; 7) physician may dictate the history in the presence of the examinee; 8) physician examines examinee with staff member in attendance, documenting negative, physical, and nonphysiologic findings; 9) physician concludes evaluation, records end time, and provides a satisfaction survey to examinee; 10) examinee returns satisfaction survey before departure. Postevaluation work includes preparing the IME report, which is best done immediately after the evaluation. To perfect the IME process, examiners can assess their current approach to IMEs, identify strengths and weaknesses, and consider what can be done to improve efficiency and quality.

Download Full-text