scholarly journals MORE CONCERNING LABELS

1902 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 121-122
Author(s):  
Philip Laurent
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New Jersey ◽  
The State ◽  
State Label

It was with interest that I read the article by Mr. Frank E. Lutz in the April number of the Canadian Entomologist entitled “Labels.”It is not so very many years ago (perhaps thity) that we were satisfied if specimens sent to us only bore a State label, the State label as first used being nothing more or less than a coloured disk, a different colour for each State. A few years more, and we have the abbreviated State labels – N.J. for New Jersey, Can. for Canada, etc. Not long after, we asked our friends to mark the label in such a mnner that we might know from what part of the State the insect came. Then it was that the collector with pen and ink would mark the label in one of the corners, or perhaps make a mark in the centre, thus designating as to what part of the State the insect had come from. This was not a bad plan, and to-day may such labeled specimens can be seen in the “Horn Collection.” as well as other collections in New York and Philadelphia.

Freedom of the Air in the United States

1931 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-251
Author(s):  
Blewett Lee
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
New York ◽  
New York City ◽  
New Jersey ◽  
York City ◽  
The United States ◽  
The State ◽  
Inland Waters ◽  
State Board

On September 15, 1930, the State Board of Commerce and Navigation of New Jersey made a ruling that aircraft would not be permitted to land on any New Jersey waters above tidewater within the jurisdiction of the state. The application had been made for permission to operate a five passenger flying boat between Nolan's Point, Lake Hopatcong, a vacation resort, and New York City, and to set off a portion of the lake to make a landing place for the hydroairplane. It was stated that other inland waters in New Jersey were being used for a similar purpose, and the ground of the refusal was that aircraft flying from water constituted a menace to surface navigation. This ruling created considerable newspaper comment and aroused vigorous protest from persons interested in aviation, and by order of October 20, 1930, the ruling was limited to Lake Hopatcong.

Calendar of Meetings (National, State, Examining Boards) / Mississippi Dental Association / District of Columbia Dental Society / Connecticut State Dental Association / New Jersey State Dental Society / Oklahoma State Dental Society / Texas State Dental Society / Wyoming State Dental Association / Indiana State Board of Dental Examiners / Massachusetts Board of Dental Examiners / National Association of Dental Examiners / State Board of Registration and Examination in Dentistry of New Jersey / Rhode Island Board of Registration in Dentistry / American Dental Hygienists Association Preliminary Notice / Dental Hygienists Association of the State of New York / American Dental Golf Association / Homecoming of Loyola University Dental Department / Mouth Hygiene Campaign of Essex County, N. J / Resolutions on the Death of Kasson Church Gibson / Resolutions on the Death of Edward S. Gaylord / Clarence J. Grieves Library Foundation of the Maryland State / Dental Association / Book Review / Seventh International Dental Congress / Certain Knowledge Instills Confidence

1926 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 400-408
Author(s):  
W.F. Beavers ◽  
W.W. Wyman ◽  
R.H.W. Strang ◽  
F.K. Heazelton ◽  
W.T. Jacobs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New Jersey ◽  
Rhode Island ◽  
District Of Columbia ◽  
The State ◽  
Dental Hygienists ◽  
National State ◽  
Essex County ◽  
State Board

Constitutionality of Merit System Legislation

1919 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 593-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben A. Arneson
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
New Jersey ◽  
Civil Service ◽  
Attorney General ◽  
National Government ◽  
The State ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Law ◽  
Service Legislation ◽  
Merit System

Constitutional objections to many of the provisions of the civil service laws have been raised in several of the jurisdictions in which such legislation has been enacted. In addition to the national government there are today ten states which have provided for the application of the merit system to the appointment of all or a portion of the administrative officers and employees. These ten states with the dates of the adoption of the law are as follows: New York, 1883; Massachusetts, 1884; Wisconsin, 1905; New Jersey, 1908; Illinois, 1911; Colorado, 1912; Ohio, California and Connecticut, 1913; and Kansas, 1915. In Illinois and Colorado the employees in the state institutions had been under the merit system for several years prior to the adoption of the general civil service laws.In four of these jurisdictions—California, Colorado, Connecticut and Kansas—there have been no cases involving the constitutionality of civil service legislation. In Colorado there have been at least two bitter controversies in the courts as to the interpretation of the law but in neither case did the parties who fought the law contend that it was unconstitutional. The question of the legality of the adoption of the Colorado law has also been before the courts; but the constitutionality of the provisions of the law has not been attacked. In New Jersey the only case of importance touching the matter of constitutionality is that of the Attorney-General v. McGuinness, but here the decision dealt entirely with the constitutionality of one of the methods prescribed for extending the operation of the law to municipalities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document