scholarly journals Impact of Idiosyncratic Volatility on Average Stock Returns: Evidence from Sri Lanka

Author(s):  
H. A. P. K. Perera ◽  
T. C. Ediriwickrama
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 740
Author(s):  
H.A.P.K. Perera ◽  
Tharindu Chamara Ediriwickrama

Author(s):  
Hannes Mohrschladt ◽  
Judith C. Schneider

AbstractWe establish a direct link between sophisticated investors in the option market, private stock market investors, and the idiosyncratic volatility (IVol) puzzle. To do so, we employ three option-based volatility spreads and attention data from Google Trends. In line with the IVol puzzle, the volatility spreads indicate that sophisticated investors indeed consider high-IVol stocks as being overvalued. Moreover, the option measures help to distinguish overpriced from fairly priced high-IVol stocks. Thus, these measures are able to predict the IVol puzzle’s magnitude in the cross-section of stock returns. Further, we link the origin of the IVol puzzle to the trading activity of irrational private investors as the return predictability only exists among stocks that receive a high level of private investor attention. Overall, our joint examination of option and stock markets sheds light on the behavior of different investor groups and their contribution to the IVol puzzle. Thereby, our analyses support the intuitive idea that noise trading leads to mispricing, which is identified by sophisticated investors and exploited in the option market.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 431-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Qadan ◽  
Doron Kliger ◽  
Nir Chen

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Amal Peter Abeysekera ◽  
Pulukkuttige Don Nimal
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 271-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Guo ◽  
Haimanot Kassa ◽  
Michael F. Ferguson

AbstractA spurious positive relation between exponential generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (EGARCH) estimates of expected monthtidiosyncratic volatility and monthtstock returns arises when the monthtreturn is included in estimation of model parameters. We illustrate via simulations that this look-ahead bias is problematic for empirically observed degrees of stock return skewness and typical monthly return time series lengths. Moreover, the empirical idiosyncratic risk-return relation becomes negligible when expected monthtidiosyncratic volatility is estimated using returns only up to montht− 1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document