Oral Care Interventions in Critical Care: Frequency and Documentation

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Jo Grap ◽  
Cindy L. Munro ◽  
Brooke Ashtiani ◽  
Sandra Bryant

• Background No data have been collected to describe the products, methods, and frequency of oral care needed to reduce dental plaque, oral colonization, and ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients.• Objectives To describe the frequency of use of oral care interventions reported by nurses in several intensive care units in a large southeastern medical center.• Methods Staff members completed a written survey describing their oral care practices, and oral care interventions were recorded from the unit’s flow sheet for the previous 24 hours for all patients at 5 randomly selected times during 1 month.• Results Most respondents (75%) reported providing oral care 2 or 3 times daily for nonintubated patients, and 72% reported providing care 5 times daily or more for intubated patients. However, oral care was documented on the unit’s flow sheet a mean of 1.2 times per patient. Reported use of toothpaste and a toothbrush was significantly greater in nonintubated patients (P < .001), and use of a sponge toothette was significantly greater in intubated patients (P < .001). Nurses’ mean rating of oral care priority was 53.9 on a 100-point scale.• Conclusions Despite evidence that they are ineffective for plaque removal, sponge toothettes remain the primary tool for oral care, especially in intubated patients in intensive care units. Nurses report frequent oral care interventions, but few are documented. Education and focus on good oral care strategies are required; nursing research to delineate the best procedure for all patients in intensive care units is needed.

2004 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Binkley ◽  
L.Allen Furr ◽  
Ruth Carrico ◽  
Cynthia McCurren

2007 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1066-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordi Rello ◽  
Despoina Koulenti ◽  
Stijn Blot ◽  
Rafael Sierra ◽  
Emili Diaz ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 267 ◽  
Author(s):  
AlexandreFranco Miranda ◽  
RenataMonteiro de Paula ◽  
CinthiaGoncalves Barbosa de Castro Piau ◽  
PriscilaPaganini Costa ◽  
AnaCristina Barreto Bezerra

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (04) ◽  
pp. 333-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Lam Soh ◽  
Sazlina Shariff Ghazali ◽  
Kim Geok Soh ◽  
Rosna Abdul Raman ◽  
Sharifah Shafinaz Sharif Abdullah ◽  
...  

Introduction: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common nosocomial infection in intensive care units (ICUs).  One factor causing VAP is aspiration of oral colonisation, which may result from poor oral care practice.  Oral care using tooth brushing can prevent formulation of dental plaque that can be a reservoir for microbes causing VAP. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 124 nurses, using a self-administered questionnaire, to determine methods used, frequency, and attitude of nurses toward oral care provided to mechanically ventilated patients in Malaysian ICUs.  Results: Methods for oral care and their frequency of use varied between nurses even in the same unit. Cotton with forceps was used by 73.4% of the nurses. Some nurses used forceps and gauze (65%) or spatulas and gauze (36%). Toothbrushes were used by 50.8% of the nurses. Nurses in this hospital reported to have positive attitude toward providing oral care. Conclusions: The survey showed the need to have standardised oral care protocols in ICUs to improve quality of oral care provided to ventilated patients.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilio Rodríguez‐Ruiz ◽  
Maitane Campelo‐Izquierdo ◽  
Montserrat Mansilla Rodríguez ◽  
Ana Estany‐Gestal ◽  
Andrés Blanco Hortas ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 290-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Carolina Nunes Vilela ◽  
Gustavo Zanna Ferreira ◽  
Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos ◽  
Nathalie Pepe Medeiros de Rezende

To perform a systematic review of the literature on the control of oral biofilms and the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia, in addition to assessing and classifying studies as to the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. The review was based on PubMed, LILACS, and Scopus databases, from January 1st, 2000 until December 31st, 2012. Studies evaluating oral hygiene care related to nosocomial infections in patients hospitalized in intensive care units were selected according to the inclusion criteria. Full published articles available in English, Spanish, or Portuguese, which approached chemical or mechanical oral hygiene techniques in preventing pneumonia, interventions performed, and their results were included. After analysis, the articles were classified according to level of evidence and grade of recommendation according to the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. A total of 297 abstracts were found, 14 of which were full articles that met our criteria. Most articles included a study group with chlorhexidine users and a control group with placebo users for oral hygiene in the prevention of pneumonia. All articles were classified as B in the level of evidence, and 12 articles were classified as 2B and two articles as 2C in grade of recommendation. It was observed that the control of oral biofilm reduces the incidence of nosocomial pneumonia, but the fact that most articles had an intermediate grade of recommendation makes clear the need to conduct randomized controlled trials with minimal bias to establish future guidelines for oral hygiene in intensive care units.


Mycoses ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arezu Charsizadeh ◽  
Hossein Mirhendi ◽  
Bahram Nikmanesh ◽  
Hamid Eshaghi ◽  
Koichi Makimura

2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1060-1069 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ping-Yun Huang ◽  
Zhi-Yuan Shi ◽  
Chi-Hao Chen ◽  
Walter Den ◽  
Hui-Mei Huang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document