Moral Resilience: A Capacity for Navigating Moral Distress in Critical Care

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynda Hylton Rushton
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Moral Resilience

Moral distress: Developing strategies from experience

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1147-1156
Author(s):  
Andrew Helmers ◽  
Karen Dryden Palmer ◽  
Rebecca A Greenberg
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Work Environment ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Paediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Moral Resilience

Background Moral distress was first described by Jameton in 1984, and has been defined as distress experienced by an individual when they are unable to carry out what they believe to be the right course of action because of real or perceived constraints on that action. This complex phenomenon has been studied extensively among healthcare providers, and intensive care professionals in particular report high levels of moral distress. This distress has been associated with provider burnout and associated consequences such as job attrition, with potential impacts on patient and family care. There is a paucity of literature exploring how middle and late career healthcare providers experience and cope with moral distress. Objectives We explore the experience of moral distress and the strategies and resources invoked to mitigate that distress in mid- and late-career healthcare providers practicing in paediatric intensive care, in order to identify ways in which the work environment can build a culture of moral resilience. Research design An exploratory, qualitative quality improvement project utilizing focus group and semi-structured interviews with pediatric intensive care front-line providers. Participants Mid-and-later career (10 + years in practice) pediatric intensive care front line providers in a tertiary pediatric hospital. Research context This work focuses on paediatric intensive care providers in a single critical care unit, in order to explore the site-specific perspectives of health care providers in that context with respect to moral distress coping strategies. Ethical considerations The study was approved by the Quality Management Office at the institution; consent was obtained from participants, and no identifying data was included in this project. Findings Participants endorsed perspective-building and described strategies for positive adaptation including; active, reflective and structured supports. Participants articulated interest in enhanced and accessible formal supports. Discussion Findings in this study resonate with the current literature in healthcare provider moral distress, and exposed ways in which the work environment could support a culture of moral resilience. Avenues are described for the management and mitigation of moral distress in this setting. Conclusion This exploratory work lays the groundwork for interventions that facilitate personal growth and meaning in the midst of moral crises in critical care practice.

scholarly journals COVID-19 and Moral Distress: A Pediatric Critical Care Survey

2021 ◽  
pp. e1-e19
Author(s):  
Tessy A. Thomas ◽  
F. Daniel Davis ◽  
Shelley Kumar ◽  
Satid Thammasitboon ◽  
Cynda H. Rushton
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Organizational Support ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Ethical Challenge ◽  
Pediatric Critical Care ◽  
Professional Integrity ◽  
Quality Patient Care ◽  
Care Survey ◽  
Moral Resilience

Background Moral distress adversely affects the delivery of high-quality patient care and places health care professionals at risk for burnout, moral injury, and the loss of professional integrity. Objectives To investigate whether pediatric critical care professionals are experiencing moral distress during the COVID-19 pandemic and, if so, for what reasons. Methods An exploratory survey of pediatric critical care professionals was conducted via the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network from April to May 2020. The survey was derived from a framework integrating contemporary literature on moral distress, moral resilience, and expert consensus. Integration of descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data yielded mixed insights. Results Overall, 85.8% of survey respondents reported moral distress. Nurses reported higher degrees of moral distress than other professional groups. Inducers of moral distress were related to challenges to professional integrity and lack of organizational support. Five themes were identified: (1) psychological safety, (2) expectations of leadership, (3) connectedness through a moral community, (4) professional identity challenges, and (5) professional versus social responsibility. Most respondents were confident in their ability to reason through ethical dilemmas (76.0%) and think clearly when confronting an ethical challenge even when pressured (78.9%). Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic, pediatric critical care professionals are experiencing moral distress due to various factors that challenge their professional integrity. Despite these challenges, they also exhibit attributes of moral resilience. Organizations have opportunities to cultivate a psychologically safe and healthy work environment to mitigate anticipatory, present, and lingering moral distress.

Gender and the experience of moral distress in critical care nurses

2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher B O’Connell
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Gender Difference ◽  
Intent To Leave ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Psychological Symptoms ◽  
Research Question ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Underrepresented Groups ◽  
Distress Scale

Background: Nursing practice is complex, as nurses are challenged by increasingly intricate moral and ethical judgments. Inadequately studied in underrepresented groups in nursing, moral distress is a serious problem internationally for healthcare professionals with deleterious effects to patients, nurses, and organizations. Moral distress among nurses has been shown to contribute to decreased job satisfaction and increased turnover, withdrawal from patients, physical and psychological symptoms, and intent to leave current position or to leave the profession altogether. Research question: Do significant gender differences exist in the moral distress scores of critical care nurses? Research design: This study utilized a quantitative, descriptive methodology to explore moral distress levels in a sample of critical care nurses to determine whether gender differences exist in their mean moral distress scores. Participants and research context: Participants ( n = 31) were critical care nurses from an American Internet nursing community who completed the Moral Distress Scale–Revised online over a 5-day period in July 2013. Ethical considerations: Institutional review board review approved the study, and accessing and completing the survey implied informed consent. Findings: The results revealed a statistically significant gender difference in the mean moral distress scores of participants. Females reported statistically significantly higher moral distress scores than did males. Overall, the moral distress scores for both groups were relatively low. Discussion: The findings of a gender difference have not previously been reported in the literature. However, other findings are consistent with previous studies on moral distress. Conclusion: Although the results of this study are not generalizable, they do suggest the need for continuing research on moral distress in underrepresented groups in nursing, including cultural and ethnic groups.

The New Frontline: Exploring the Links between Moral Distress, Moral Resilience and Mental Health in Healthcare Workers Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Spilg ◽  
Cynda Hylton Rushton ◽  
Jennifer L. Phillips ◽  
Tetyana Kendzerska ◽  
Mysa Saad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Healthcare Workers ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Moral Resilience

Moral Distress of Staff Nurses in a Medical Intensive Care Unit

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 523-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen H. Elpern ◽  
Barbara Covert ◽  
Ruth Kleinpell
Keyword(s):  
Job Satisfaction ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Medical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Individual Characteristics ◽  
Medical Intensive Care ◽  
Distress Scale

• Background Moral distress is caused by situations in which the ethically appropriate course of action is known but cannot be taken. Moral distress is thought to be a serious problem among nurses, particularly those who practice in critical care. It has been associated with job dissatisfaction and loss of nurses from the workplace and the profession.• Objectives To assess the level of moral distress of nurses in a medical intensive care unit, identify situations that result in high levels of moral distress, explore implications of moral distress, and evaluate associations among moral distress and individual characteristics of nurses.• Methods A descriptive, questionnaire study was used. A total of 28 nurses working in a medical intensive care unit anonymously completed a 38-item moral distress scale and described implications of experiences of moral distress.• Results Nurses reported a moderate level of moral distress overall. Highest levels of distress were associated with the provision of aggressive care to patients not expected to benefit from that care. Moral distress was significantly correlated with years of nursing experience. Nurses reported that moral distress adversely affected job satisfaction, retention, psychological and physical well-being, self-image, and spirituality. Experience of moral distress also influenced attitudes toward advance directives and participation in blood donation and organ donation.• Conclusions Critical care nurses commonly encounter situations that are associated with high levels of moral distress. Experiences of moral distress have implications that extend well beyond job satisfaction and retention. Strategies to mitigate moral distress should be developed and tested.

Moral distress of critical care nurses

1995 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 280-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
MC Corley
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Critical Care ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Private Hospital ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Moral Integrity ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Aggressive Care

BACKGROUND: Constraint of nurses by healthcare organizations, from actions the nurses believe are appropriate, may lead to moral distress. OBJECTIVE: To present findings on moral distress of critical care nurses, using an investigator-developed instrument. METHODS: An instrument development design using consensus by three expert judges, test-retest reliability, and factor analysis was used. Study participants (N = 111) were members of a chapter of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, critical care nurses employed in a large medical center, and critical care nurses from a private hospital. A 32-item instrument included items on prolonging life, performing unnecessary tests and treatments, lying to patients, and incompetent or inadequate treatment by physicians. RESULTS: Three factors were identified using factor analysis after expert consensus on the items: aggressive care, honesty, and action response. Nurses in the private hospital reported significantly greater moral distress on the aggressive care factor than did nurses in the medical center. Nurses not working in intensive care experienced higher levels of moral distress on the aggressive care factor than did nurses working in intensive care. Of the 111 nurses, 12% had left a nursing position primarily because of moral distress. CONCLUSIONS: Although the mean scores showed somewhat low levels of moral distress, the range of responses revealed that some nurses experienced high levels of moral distress with the issues. Research is needed on conditions organizations must provide to support the moral integrity of critical care nurses.

Moral Resilience

2018 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Moral Distress ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
Radical Change ◽  
Moral Foundations ◽  
Self Awareness ◽  
Ethical Practice ◽  
Healthcare Organizations ◽  
Full Spectrum ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Moral Resilience

Suffering is an unavoidable reality in healthcare. Not only are patients and families suffering but also the clinicians who care for them. Commonly the suffering experienced by clinicians is moral in nature, in part a reflection of the increasing complexity of health care, their roles within it, and the expanding range of available interventions that challenge their moral foundations. Moral suffering is the anguish that arises occurs in response to moral adversity that challenges clinicians’ integrity: the inner harmony that arises when their essential values and commitments are aligned with their choices and actions. The sources and sequelae of moral distress, one type of moral suffering, have been documented among clinicians across specialties. Transforming their suffering will require solutions that expanded individual and system strategies. Moral resilience, the capacity of an individual to restore or sustain integrity in response to moral adversity, offers a path forward. It encompasses capacities aimed at developing self- regulation and self-awareness, buoyancy, moral efficacy, self-stewardship and ultimately personal and relational integrity. Whether it involves gradual or profound radical change clinicians have the potential to transform themselves and their clinical practice in ways that more authentically reflect their character, intentions and values. The burden of healing our healthcare system is not the sole responsibility of individuals. Clinicians and healthcare organizations must work together to transform moral suffering by cultivating the individual capacities for moral resilience and designing a new architecture to support ethical practice. Used worldwide for scalable and sustainable change, the Conscious Full Spectrum approach, offers a method to solve problems to support integrity, shift patterns that undermine moral resilience and ethical practice, and leverage the inner potential of clinicians and leaders to produce meaningful and sustainable results that benefit all.

The Need for an Effective Process to Resolve Conflicts Over Medical Futility: A Case Study and Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 13-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn A. Olmstead ◽  
Michael D. Dahnke
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
Policy Development ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Medical Model ◽  
Medical Futility ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Practice Nurses ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Court Intervention ◽  
The Right

The issue of medical futility requires a well-defined process in which both sides of the dispute can be heard and a resolution reached in a fair and ethical manner. Procedural approaches to medical futility cases provide all parties involved with a process-driven framework for resolving these disputes. Medical paternalism or the belief in the absolute rightness of the medical model will not serve to resolve these disputes. Although medical futility is first determined by medicine, in order for the determination to meet legal criteria, it must be subject to review. The hope is that through a review process that meets legal criteria, the issue can be resolved without the need for court proceedings. If resolution cannot be obtained through this process, surrogates still have the right to seek court intervention. This issue is of relevance and importance in critical care nursing because of the role and position of critical care nurses, who have direct contact with patients and patients’ families, the potential for moral distress in cases of possibly futile treatment, and the expanding roles of nurses, including critical care nurses and advanced practice nurses, in management and policy development.

Consequences of clinical situations that cause critical care nurses to experience moral distress

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 479-487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra L Wiegand ◽  
Marjorie Funk
Keyword(s):  
Critical Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Thematic Analysis ◽  
Moral Distress ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Critical Care Nurses ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Methodological Rigor ◽  
Descriptive Approach

Little is known about the consequences of moral distress. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical situations that caused nurses to experience moral distress, to understand the consequences of those situations, and to determine whether nurses would change their practice based on their experiences. The investigation used a descriptive approach. Open-ended surveys were distributed to a convenience sample of 204 critical care nurses employed at a university medical center. The analysis of participants’ responses used an inductive approach and a thematic analysis. Each line of the data was reviewed and coded, and the codes were collapsed into themes. Methodological rigor was established. Forty-nine nurses responded to the survey. The majority of nurses had experienced moral distress, and the majority of situations that caused nurses to experience moral distress were related to end of life. The nurses described negative consequences for themselves, patients, and families.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document