Mark-recapture estimates of pup production for the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) at Seal Bay Conservation Park, South Australia

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.R. McIntosh ◽  
P.D. Shaughnessy ◽  
S.D. Goldsworthy
Keyword(s):  
South Australia ◽  
Sea Lion ◽  
Mark Recapture ◽  
Neophoca Cinerea ◽  
Australian Sea Lion ◽  
Conservation Park

Maternal strategies of the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) at Dangerous Reef, South Australia

2011 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Lowther ◽  
Simon D. Goldsworthy
Keyword(s):  
South Australia ◽  
Maternal Investment ◽  
Milk Lipid ◽  
Resource Exploitation ◽  
Sea Lion ◽  
Breeding Sites ◽  
Neophoca Cinerea ◽  
Australian Sea Lion ◽  
Spatial Differences ◽  
Pup Growth

Maternal strategies of otariid seals reflect the optimisation between resource exploitation and offspring provisioning driven across spatially separated foraging and nursing grounds. Intercolony variation in the expression of maternal strategies may represent temporal and spatial differences in resource availability, intraspecies competition or differences in life-history traits. The current study describes maternal strategies of the Australian sea lion at the largest breeding colony of the species (Dangerous Reef) and a comparative analysis was performed with data collected 16 years earlier at Seal Bay (Kangaroo Island). Significant differences in maternal strategies were characterised by lower milk lipid content (21.0 versus 28.9%), abbreviated periods onshore (0.93 versus 1.63 days) and slower pup growth rates (0.09–0.12 kg day–1) at Dangerous Reef. These data suggest flexibility in the expression of maternal investment between breeding sites and support the hypothesis of localised adaptation

Dietary analysis of regurgitates and stomach samples from free-living Australian sea lions

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca R. McIntosh ◽  
Brad Page ◽  
Simon D. Goldsworthy
Keyword(s):  
Prey Species ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Rock Lobster ◽  
Sea Lion ◽  
Free Living ◽  
Dietary Analysis ◽  
Sea Lions ◽  
Neophoca Cinerea ◽  
Australian Sea Lion ◽  
Sepia Apama

Dietary remains recovered from Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) digestive tracts and regurgitate samples from Seal Bay (Kangaroo Island, South Australia) were used to identify prey species consumed. Four of eight digestive tracts collected (50%) contained prey items located only in the stomach. On the basis of biomass reconstruction of cephalopod prey remains, octopus contributed 40% of the biomass in the samples, giant cuttlefish (Sepia apama) contributed 30% and ommastrephid squids contributed 14% biomass. The remains of several fish species were found in the samples: leatherjacket (Monocanthidae), flathead (Platycephalus sp.), swallowtail (Centroberyx lineatus), common bullseye (Pempheris multiradiata), southern school whiting (Sillago flindersi) and yellowtail mackerel (Trachurus novaezelandiae). Southern rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) and swimming crab (Ovalipes australiensis) carapace fragments, little penguin (Eudyptula minor) feathers and bones and shark egg cases (oviparous species and Scyliorhinidae sp.) were also identified.

Assessing the use of milk fatty acids to infer the diet of the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea)

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 169 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. M. Baylis ◽  
D. J. Hamer ◽  
P. D. Nichols
Keyword(s):  
South Australia ◽  
Satellite Tracking ◽  
Sea Lion ◽  
Milk Fatty Acids ◽  
Sea Lions ◽  
Neophoca Cinerea ◽  
Australian Sea Lion ◽  
Fa Composition ◽  
Pinniped Species ◽  
Management Plans

Information on the diet of threatened species is important in devising appropriate management plans to ensure their conservation. The Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) is Australia’s only endemic and globally one of the least numerous pinniped species. However, dietary information is currently limited because of the difficulty in using traditional methods (identification of prey hard parts from scats, regurgitates and stomach samples) to reliably provide dietary information. The present study assessed the use of fatty acid (FA) analysis to infer diet using milk samples collected from 11 satellite tracked Australian sea lions from Olive Island, South Australia. Satellite tracking revealed that females foraged in two distinct regions; ‘inshore’ regions characterised by shallow bathymetry (10.7 ± 4.8 m) and ‘offshore’ regions characterised by comparatively deep bathymetry (60.5 ± 13.4 m). Milk FA analysis indicated significant differences in the FA composition between females that foraged inshore compared with those that foraged offshore. The greatest differences in relative levels of individual FAs between the inshore and offshore groups were for 22 : 6n-3 (6.5 ± 1.2% compared with 16.5 ± 1.9% respectively), 20 : 4n-6 (6.1 ± 0.7 compared with 2.5 ± 0.7 respectively) and 22 : 4n-6 (2.4 ± 0.2% compared with 0.8 ± 0.2% respectively). Using discriminant scores, crustacean, cephalopod, fish and shark-dominated diets were differentiated. The discriminant scores from Australian sea lions that foraged inshore indicated a mixed fish and shark diet, whereas discriminant scores from Australian sea lions that foraged offshore indicated a fish-dominated diet, although results must be interpreted with caution due to the assumptions associated with the prey FA dataset. FA analysis in combination with satellite tracking proved to be a powerful tool for assessing broad-scale spatial dietary patterns.

Pup numbers of the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea) at The Pages Islands, South Australia, over two decades

2013 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter D. Shaughnessy ◽  
Simon D. Goldsworthy ◽  
Paul Burch ◽  
Terry E. Dennis
Keyword(s):  
Population Size ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Sea Lion ◽  
Breeding Colony ◽  
Sea Lions ◽  
Neophoca Cinerea ◽  
Australian Sea Lion ◽  
Gill Net ◽  
Low Levels ◽  
Breeding Seasons

The Australian sea lion is an Australian endemic, restricted to South Australia and Western Australia, with 86% of the population in South Australia. It was listed under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act as Vulnerable in February 2005, and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature has listed it as Endangered. Sea lions are taken as bycatch in the gill-net fishery for school shark and gummy shark, and the risk of extinction of breeding colonies is high even from low levels of bycatch. We assessed trends in pup population size at The Pages Islands, a large breeding colony in South Australia. Pup abundance was estimated by direct counting of live and dead pups; the maximum count in each breeding season was used for trend analysis. The average of direct counts of pups in 14 breeding seasons between 1989–90 and 2009–10 was 473 (s.d. = 58.4). There was no trend in pup numbers, contrasting with two other large colonies: Seal Bay, Kangaroo Island (decreasing), and Dangerous Reef (increasing since 2000). The Australian Sea Lion Management Strategy of the Australian Fisheries Management Authority aims to reduce sea lion bycatch in the shark fishery; a key item is a fishery closure around each breeding colony in South Australia. Implementation of the closure around The Pages should lower the risk of bycatch of its sea lions with foraging areas that previously overlapped with the fishery and should allow the colony’s population size to increase.

Estimating pup production in a mammal with an extended and aseasonal breeding season, the Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea)

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca R. McIntosh ◽  
Simon D. Goldsworthy ◽  
Peter D. Shaughnessy ◽  
Clarence W. Kennedy ◽  
Paul Burch
Keyword(s):  
Breeding Season ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Rate Of Change ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Sea Lion ◽  
Mark Recapture ◽  
Australian Sea Lion ◽  
Rate Of Decline ◽  
Breeding Seasons ◽  
Pup Mortality

Context The Australian sea lion population at Seal Bay Conservation Park, South Australia, was estimated to be declining at a rate of 1.14% per breeding season, on the basis of maximum counts of live pups in each of 13 breeding seasons (Shaughnessy et al. 2006). The reliability of the pup-production estimates used to identify this decline is uncertain. Aims Our aims were to obtain representative and repeatable estimates of pup production and to assess the current rate of decline. Methods We compared four estimates of pup abundance over five breeding seasons (2002–03, 2004, 2005–06, 2007, 2008–09), including the count of cumulative new births, the maximum live-pup count, the number of pups given passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags, and mark–recapture methods using the Petersen estimate. Key results A total of 90% of pup births occurred over a mean of 124 days (s.d. = 14). Final estimates of pup production (from the largest of the four estimation methods used) in the five seasons were 227 (CL 221–239), 288 (CL 273–302), 219 (NA), 260 (CL 254–272) and 268 (CL 268–269). The average estimate of pup mortality was 28.6% (s.d. = 6.3%). The decline in the population at Seal Bay over 17 breeding seasons on the basis of maximum counts of live pups was 0.51% per year or 0.76% per breeding season. However, this trend was not based on best estimates of pup production. On the basis of final estimates for the last five breeding seasons, there is no declining trend. Conclusions The count of cumulative new births was the most reliable measure of pup production; the Petersen mark–recapture estimate provided a check for accuracy and confidence limits about the estimate. Implications The actual rate of change and the expected trajectory of the Seal Bay population remain uncertain. Ongoing monitoring is a priority for this site, using the reliable methods of estimating pup production identified in the present study.

Stautus of the Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea, in the Great Australian Bight

1996 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 741 ◽  
Author(s):  
TE Dennis ◽  
PD Shaughnessy
Keyword(s):  
Total Population ◽  
South Australia ◽  
Previous Estimate ◽  
Sea Lion ◽  
Breeding Sites ◽  
Sea Lions ◽  
Neophoca Cinerea ◽  
Australian Sea Lion ◽  
Fur Seals ◽  
Great Australian Bight

In August 1994, a systematic survey of potential haulout sites of the Australian sea lion, Neophoca cinerea, was conducted along the coastline of the Great Australian Bight from Twin Rocks to Wilson Bluff, a distance of 206 km. A total of 289 Australian sea lions was recorded at 23 sites widely dispersed at the base of the Bunda Cliffs, hauled out on perched platforms formed by collapsed sections of cliff at various levels above the sea. Of these, 37 sea lions were recorded in a deep cave accessed from the sea. The total included 86 pups aged under 12 months, which were probably born in the region; six of these had almost completed moulting their natal pelage and were estimated to be near four months old. Only 12 New Zealand fur seals, Arctocephalus forsteri, were recorded. The Australian sea lion sites located in 1994 were surveyed again in August-September 1995, during a predicted breeding season. In this survey, a total of 284 sea lions was recorded at nine sites in South Australia and one site in Western Australia. This included 90 pups under six months of age, of which 44 were still in lanugo. Overall, we recorded 10 breeding sites and 14 haulout sites. Breeding events were recorded at one colony over three seasons and were consistent with an 18-month cycle. By extrapolating from the number of sea lion pups found in 1994, the population for the Great Australian Bight region in South Australia is estimated to be 613-774. This addition increases the previous estimate for South Australia by 9.3% and the previous total population estimate by 6.6%.

Functional-Morphology of the Alimentary-Tract of the Australian Sea-Lion, Neophoca-Cinerea

1987 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 219 ◽  
Author(s):  
KC Richardson ◽  
NJ Gales
Keyword(s):  
Alimentary Tract ◽  
Fine Particles ◽  
Stomach Contents ◽  
Coarse Particles ◽  
Pyloric Antrum ◽  
Sea Lion ◽  
Neophoca Cinerea ◽  
Australian Sea Lion ◽  
Acting In Concert ◽  
Pyloric Canal

The form and topographic relationships of the alimentary tract of Neophoca cinerea is described based on dissection and radiography. A highly distensible oesophagus enters the dorsum of a large J-shaped stomach. The small intestine is long, circa 20 m, and the large intestine short, circa 1.2 m. Marker pellets (approximate diameter 1 or 3 mm) administered orally were generally found in faecal deposits containing, principally, coarse particles, i.e. of diameter greater than 1.2 mm. Most faecal deposits consisted of fine particles, i.e. with a diameter primarily of less than 1.2 mm. About 50% of the large markers remained in the alimentary tract for more than 6 days. A pyloric torus acting in concert with the patterns of pyloric peristalsis may prevent or restrict the passage of markers through the pyloric canal. Examination of the stomach contents from six animals showed that items of low digestibility, such as squid beaks and crayfish exoskeletons, were retained in the pyloric antrum.

Louse infestations of the Australian sea lion Neophoca cinerea.

2007 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 103 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.R. McIntosh ◽  
M.D. Murray
Keyword(s):  
Sea Lion ◽  
Sea Lions ◽  
Neophoca Cinerea ◽  
Australian Sea Lion

Sea lions (Neophoca cinerea) at several South Australian islands were infested with the anopluran louse Antarctophthirus microchir.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document