Comprehensive Survey of the Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithms

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wali Khan Mashwani
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Mathematical Formulation ◽  
Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Pareto Optimal Set ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Comprehensive Survey ◽  
Optimal Set

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) and an improved non-dominating sorting multiobjective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) is two well known multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) in the field of evolutionary computation. This paper mainly reviews their hybrid versions and some other algorithms which are developed for solving multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs. The mathematical formulation of a MOP and some basic definitions for tackling MOPs, including Pareto optimality, Pareto optimal set (PS), Pareto front (PF) are provided in Section 1. Section 2 presents a brief introduction to hybrid MOEAs. The authors present literature review in subsections. Subsection 2.1 provides memetic multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Subsection 2.2 presents the hybrid versions of well-known Pareto dominance based MOEAs. Subsection 2.4 summarizes some enhanced Versions of MOEA/D paradigm. Subsection 2.5 reviews some multimethod search approaches dealing optimization problems.

Comprehensive Survey of the Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithms

2015 ◽  
pp. 322-343
Author(s):  
Wali Khan Mashwani
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Mathematical Formulation ◽  
Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Pareto Optimal Set ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Comprehensive Survey ◽  
Hybrid Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Optimal Set

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition (MOEA/D) and an improved non-dominating sorting multiobjective genetic algorithm (NSGA-II) are two well known multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) in the field of evolutionary computation. This paper mainly reviews their hybrid versions and some other algorithms which are developed for solving multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs. The mathematical formulation of a MOP and some basic definitions for tackling MOPs, including Pareto optimality, Pareto optimal set (PS), Pareto front (PF) are provided in Section 1. Section 2 presents a brief introduction to hybrid MOEAs. The authors present literature review in subsections. Subsection 2.1 provides memetic multiobjective evolutionary algorithms. Subsection 2.2 presents the hybrid versions of well-known Pareto dominance based MOEAs. Subsection 2.4 summarizes some enhanced Versions of MOEA/D paradigm. Subsection 2.5 reviews some multimethod search approaches dealing optimization problems.

scholarly journals A Review of Surrogate Assisted Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Díaz-Manríquez ◽  
Gregorio Toscano ◽  
Jose Hugo Barron-Zambrano ◽  
Edgar Tello-Leal
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Surrogate Models ◽  
Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Computationally Expensive

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms have incorporated surrogate models in order to reduce the number of required evaluations to approximate the Pareto front of computationally expensive multiobjective optimization problems. Currently, few works have reviewed the state of the art in this topic. However, the existing reviews have focused on classifying the evolutionary multiobjective optimization algorithms with respect to the type of underlying surrogate model. In this paper, we center our focus on classifying multiobjective evolutionary algorithms with respect to their integration with surrogate models. This interaction has led us to classify similar approaches and identify advantages and disadvantages of each class.

scholarly journals Performances Assessment of MOMA-Plus Method on Multiobjective Optimization Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-68
Author(s):  
Alexandre Som ◽  
Kounhinir Some ◽  
Abdoulaye Compaore ◽  
Blaise Some
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multiobjective Problems ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Non Linear

This work is devoted to evaluate the performances of the MOMA-plus method in solving multiobjective optimization problems. This assessment is doing on the complexity of its algorithm, the convergence and the diversity of solutions in relation to the Pareto front. All these parameters were evaluated on non-linear multiobjective test problems and obtained solutions are compared with those provided by the NSGA-II method. This comparative study made it possible tohighlight the performances of MOMA-plus method for solving non-linear multiobjective problems.

Combining Convergence and Diversity in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Laumanns ◽  
Lothar Thiele ◽  
Kalyanmoy Deb ◽  
Eckart Zitzler
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Fundamental Problem ◽  
Pareto Optimal ◽  
Pareto Optimal Solutions ◽  
Optimal Solutions ◽  
Pareto Optimal Set ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Baseline Algorithm

Over the past few years, the research on evolutionary algorithms has demonstrated their niche in solving multiobjective optimization problems, where the goal is to find a number of Pareto-optimal solutions in a single simulation run. Many studies have depicted different ways evolutionary algorithms can progress towards the Pareto-optimal set with a widely spread distribution of solutions. However, none of the multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) has a proof of convergence to the true Pareto-optimal solutions with a wide diversity among the solutions. In this paper, we discuss why a number of earlier MOEAs do not have such properties. Based on the concept of ɛ-dominance, new archiving strategies are proposed that overcome this fundamental problem and provably lead to MOEAs that have both the desired convergence and distribution properties. A number of modifications to the baseline algorithm are also suggested. The concept of ɛ-dominance introduced in this paper is practical and should make the proposed algorithms useful to researchers and practitioners alike.

scholarly journals An Improved Multiobjective Algorithm: DNSGA2-PSA

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Dan Qu ◽  
Xianfeng Ding ◽  
Hongmei Wang
Keyword(s):  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Equal Importance ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Diversity Preservation ◽  
Ranking Scheme ◽  
Nondominated Sorting ◽  
Better Than

In general, the proximities to a certain diversity along the front and the Pareto front have the equal importance for solving multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs). However, most of the existing evolutionary algorithms give priority to the proximity over the diversity. To improve the diversity and decrease execution time of the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II), an improved algorithm is presented in this paper, which adopts a new vector ranking scheme to decrease the whole runtime and utilize Part and Select Algorithm (PSA) to maintain the diversity. In this algorithm, a more efficient implementation of nondominated sorting, namely, dominance degree approach for nondominated sorting (DDA-NS), is presented. Moreover, an improved diversity preservation mechanism is proposed to select a well-diversified set out of an arbitrary given set. By embedding PSA and DDA-NS into NSGA-II, denoted as DNSGA2-PSA, the whole runtime of the algorithm is decreased significantly and the exploitation of diversity is enhanced. The computational experiments show that the combination of both (DDA-NS, PSA) to NSGA-II is better than the isolated use cases, and DNSGA2-PSA still performs well in the high-dimensional cases.

Domination Measure: A New Metric for Solving Multiobjective Optimization

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 565-581 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Q. Hale ◽  
Helin Zhu ◽  
Enlu Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Solution Space ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Pareto Optimal Set ◽  
Performance Metric ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Global Optima ◽  
Benchmark Test Functions ◽  
Optimal Set

For general multiobjective optimization problems, the usual goal is finding the set of solutions not dominated by any other solutions, that is, a set of solutions as good as any other solution in all objectives and strictly better in at least one objective. In this paper, we propose a novel performance metric called the domination measure to measure the quality of a solution, which can be intuitively interpreted as the probability that an arbitrary solution in the solution space dominates that solution with respect to a predefined probability measure. We then reformulate the original problem as a stochastic and single-objective optimization problem. We further propose a model-based approach to solve it, which leads to an ideal version algorithm and an implementable version algorithm. We show that the ideal version algorithm converges to a set representation of the global optima of the reformulated problem; we demonstrate the numerical performance of the implementable version algorithm by comparing it with numerous existing multiobjective optimization methods on popular benchmark test functions. The numerical results show that the proposed approach is effective in generating a finite and uniformly spread approximation of the Pareto optimal set of the original multiobjective problem and is competitive with the tested existing methods. The concept of domination measure opens the door for potentially many new algorithms, and our proposed algorithm is an instance that benefits from domination measure.

scholarly journals Difficulty Adjustable and Scalable Constrained Multiobjective Test Problem Toolkit

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhun Fan ◽  
Wenji Li ◽  
Xinye Cai ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Caimin Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Real World ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multiobjective Problems ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Dominance Principle ◽  
Constrained Multiobjective Optimization

Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have progressed significantly in recent decades, but most of them are designed to solve unconstrained multiobjective optimization problems. In fact, many real-world multiobjective problems contain a number of constraints. To promote research on constrained multiobjective optimization, we first propose a problem classification scheme with three primary types of difficulty, which reflect various types of challenges presented by real-world optimization problems, in order to characterize the constraint functions in constrained multiobjective optimization problems (CMOPs). These are feasibility-hardness, convergence-hardness, and diversity-hardness. We then develop a general toolkit to construct difficulty adjustable and scalable CMOPs (DAS-CMOPs, or DAS-CMaOPs when the number of objectives is greater than three) with three types of parameterized constraint functions developed to capture the three proposed types of difficulty. In fact, the combination of the three primary constraint functions with different parameters allows the construction of a large variety of CMOPs, with difficulty that can be defined by a triplet, with each of its parameters specifying the level of one of the types of primary difficulty. Furthermore, the number of objectives in this toolkit can be scaled beyond three. Based on this toolkit, we suggest nine difficulty adjustable and scalable CMOPs and nine CMaOPs, to be called DAS-CMOP1-9 and DAS-CMaOP1-9, respectively. To evaluate the proposed test problems, two popular CMOEAs—MOEA/D-CDP (MOEA/D with constraint dominance principle) and NSGA-II-CDP (NSGA-II with constraint dominance principle) and two popular constrained many-objective evolutionary algorithms (CMaOEAs)—C-MOEA/DD and C-NSGA-III—are used to compare performance on DAS-CMOP1-9 and DAS-CMaOP1-9 with a variety of difficulty triplets, respectively. The experimental results reveal that mechanisms in MOEA/D-CDP may be more effective in solving convergence-hard DAS-CMOPs, while mechanisms of NSGA-II-CDP may be more effective in solving DAS-CMOPs with simultaneous diversity-, feasibility-, and convergence-hardness. Mechanisms in C-NSGA-III may be more effective in solving feasibility-hard CMaOPs, while mechanisms of C-MOEA/DD may be more effective in solving CMaOPs with convergence-hardness. In addition, none of them can solve these problems efficiently, which stimulates us to continue to develop new CMOEAs and CMaOEAs to solve the suggested DAS-CMOPs and DAS-CMaOPs.

scholarly journals Performances Assessment of MOMA-Plus Method on Multiobjective Optimization Problems

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-68
Author(s):  
Alexandre Som ◽  
Kounhinir Some ◽  
Abdoulaye Compaore ◽  
Blaise Some
Keyword(s):  
Multiobjective Optimization ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Test Problems ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Multiobjective Problems ◽  
Multiobjective Optimization Problems ◽  
Non Linear

This work is devoted to evaluate the performances of the MOMA-plus method in solving multiobjective optimization problems. This assessment is doing on the complexity of its algorithm, the convergence and the diversity of solutions in relation to the Pareto front. All these parameters were evaluated on non-linear multiobjective test problems and obtained solutions are compared with those provided by the NSGA-II method. This comparative study made it possible tohighlight the performances of MOMA-plus method for solving non-linear multiobjective problems.

scholarly journals The dilemma between eliminating dominance-resistant solutions and preserving boundary solutions of extremely convex Pareto fronts

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenkun Wang ◽  
Qingyan Li ◽  
Qite Yang ◽  
Hisao Ishibuchi
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithms ◽  
Coping Strategies ◽  
Test Problem ◽  
Pareto Front ◽  
Optimization Problems ◽  
Feasible Region ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Pareto Fronts ◽  
Boundary Solutions

AbstractIt has been acknowledged that dominance-resistant solutions (DRSs) extensively exist in the feasible region of multi-objective optimization problems. Recent studies show that DRSs can cause serious performance degradation of many multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs). Thereafter, various strategies (e.g., the $$\epsilon $$ ϵ -dominance and the modified objective calculation) to eliminate DRSs have been proposed. However, these strategies may in turn cause algorithm inefficiency in other aspects. We argue that these coping strategies prevent the algorithm from obtaining some boundary solutions of an extremely convex Pareto front (ECPF). That is, there is a dilemma between eliminating DRSs and preserving boundary solutions of the ECPF. To illustrate such a dilemma, we propose a new multi-objective optimization test problem with the ECPF as well as DRSs. Using this test problem, we investigate the performance of six representative MOEAs in terms of boundary solutions preservation and DRS elimination. The results reveal that it is quite challenging to distinguish between DRSs and boundary solutions of the ECPF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document