Trigger Strategies for Standard Diffusion in Interorganizational Networks

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-67
Author(s):  
Daniel Fürstenau ◽  
Catherine Cleophas ◽  
Natalia Kliewer

When establishing a new technological standard, multiple actors often have to build coalitions to overcome the inertia of the emergent collaboration network and to mobilize decisive levels of support. The authors suggest that the emergence of a standard in a networked field can be strategically influenced by focusing only on a subset of all actors. The study defined the choice of a specific set of standard-initializing organizations as the trigger strategy. A conceptual model was developed from interorganizational collaboration as a network comprised of a set of heterogeneous, interconnected nodes, qualified by their group membership and size. The authors employed network simulations identifying the value of different trigger strategies. Data on a network of airline collaboration was used to illustrate the model. Under most conditions considered, the study found a strong triggering potential of interrelated core cliques in comparison to other trigger strategies. The results suggest that this strategy should receive more attention in the future.

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 04-30
Author(s):  
Mário José Batista Franco ◽  
Marisa Regina Reduto Santos Barbeira

The knowledge is a valuable resource in an organization .In this sense, the networks, as a strategy for the sharing of knowledge, can be one of the most important assets that an organization can adopt. Different organizations, to establish relationships with other organizations, have the opportunity to promote and share the knowledge that, strategically, serves as a mechanism for productivity and organizational effectiveness. The objective of this article is to develop a theoretical support that combines different concepts and elements to explain and understand the phenomenon of strategic alliances in organizations, as a mechanism for sharing of knowledge. We also propose a conceptual model of analysis both within and between organizations, in order to emphasize importance of knowledge management system to foment interorganizational networks and for the sharing of organizational knowledge.


Author(s):  
Don van Ravenzwaaij ◽  
Han L. J. van der Maas ◽  
Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Research using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) has shown that names labeled as Caucasian elicit more positive associations than names labeled as non-Caucasian. One interpretation of this result is that the IAT measures latent racial prejudice. An alternative explanation is that the result is due to differences in in-group/out-group membership. In this study, we conducted three different IATs: one with same-race Dutch names versus racially charged Moroccan names; one with same-race Dutch names versus racially neutral Finnish names; and one with Moroccan names versus Finnish names. Results showed equivalent effects for the Dutch-Moroccan and Dutch-Finnish IATs, but no effect for the Finnish-Moroccan IAT. This suggests that the name-race IAT-effect is not due to racial prejudice. A diffusion model decomposition indicated that the IAT-effects were caused by changes in speed of information accumulation, response conservativeness, and non-decision time.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 181-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jürgen Weibler ◽  
Sigrid Rohn-Endres

This paper develops an understanding of how shared leadership emerges in social network interactions. On the basis of a qualitative research design (grounded theory methodology – GTM) our study in two interorganizational networks offers insights into the interplay between structures, individuals, and the collective for the emergence of shared network leadership (SNL). The network-specific Gestalt of SNL appears as a pattern of collective and individual leadership activities unified under the roof of a highly developed learning conversation. More importantly, our findings support the idea that individual network leadership would not emerge without embeddedness in certain high-quality collective processes of relating and dialogue. Both theoretical and practical implications of this original network leadership perspective are discussed.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Wagner ◽  
Toril Aalberg
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire L. Sauvagnat ◽  
Jennifer M. Sanders ◽  
David V. Nelson ◽  
Stanley T. Kordinak ◽  
Marcus T. Boccaccini

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Desiree Ryan ◽  
Alexandria Jaurique ◽  
Heather J. Smith ◽  
Diana Grant
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret A. Shaffer ◽  
Anne Marie C. Francesco ◽  
Janice R. Joplin ◽  
Theresa Lau

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document