scholarly journals Mechanical properties of a glass ionomer cement incorporated with Amazon plant extract

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-417
Author(s):  
Cintia Helena Coury SARACENI ◽  
Fernanda KABADAYAN ◽  
Bruna LIMA ◽  
Renata BRAGA ◽  
Bárbara CUNHA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Plant Extract ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Ceramic Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Type IX GIC:An Invitro Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Nagalakshmi Chowdhary ◽  
N. K. Kiran ◽  
A. Lakshmi Priya ◽  
Rajashekar Reddy ◽  
Arvind Sridhara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Structural and long-term mechanical properties from a resin-modified glass ionomer cement after various delays of light-activation

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 874-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne LAGARDE ◽  
Philippe FRANCOIS ◽  
Stéphane LE GOFF ◽  
Jean-Pierre ATTAL ◽  
Elisabeth DURSUN
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Light Activation ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Mechanical properties of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement for luting: effect of adding spherical silica filler

2010 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lihua E ◽  
Masao IRIE ◽  
Noriyuki NAGAOKA ◽  
Takashi YAMASHIRO ◽  
Kazuomi SUZUKI
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Silica Filler ◽  
Spherical Silica ◽  
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

scholarly journals Mechanical Properties Enhancement of Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement by Adding Zirconium Oxide Micro and Nanoparticles

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali N. Alobiedy ◽  
Ali H. Alhille ◽  
Ahmed R. Al-Hamaoy
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Flexural Strength ◽  
Wear Rate ◽  
Zirconium Oxide ◽  
Dental Materials ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Nano Particles ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Biaxial Flexural Strength ◽  
Ionomer Cement

The aim of this work is to enhance the mechanical properties of the glass ionomer cement GIC (dental materials) by adding Zirconium Oxide ZrO2 in both micro and nano particles. GIC were mixed with (3, 5 and 7) wt% of both ZrO2 micro and nanoparticles separately. Compressive strength (CS), biaxial flexural strength (BFS), Vickers Microhardness (VH) and wear rate losses (WR) were investigated. The maximum compression strength was 122.31 MPa with 5 wt. % ZrO2 micro particle, while 3wt% nanoparticles give highest Microhardness and biaxial flexural strength of 88.8 VHN and 35.79 MPa respectively. The minimum wear rate losses were 3.776µg/m with 7 wt. % ZrO2 nanoparticle. GIC-containing ZrO2 micro and nanoparticles is a promising restorative material with improved mechanical properties expect wear rate losses.  

scholarly journals Evaluation of Chitosan Modified Glass Ionomer Cement for Microleakage under Spectrophotometer - An In-Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (33) ◽  
pp. 2769-2772
Author(s):  
Arjun Sajjeev ◽  
Ashwini Tumkur Shivkumar ◽  
Sowmya Halasabalu Kalgeri
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Restorative Material ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Evaluation Tool ◽  
Class V ◽  
Ionomer Cement

BACKGROUND Marginal integrity of glass ionomer as a restorative material is an important factor for the longevity of the restoration. Class V and cervical abrasions are the most critical and challenging lesions for restorations. The choice of material for restoring class V and cervical abrasions is glass ionomer cement (GIC). Sensitivity to moisture contact during the early setting stages is the drawback of GIC. To overcome the drawback, modifications of glass ionomer cement were made by the addition of chitosan. Chitosan (CH) is a natural linear polysaccharide obtained partially and fully by deacetylated chitin compounds, which are found in crab and shrimp shells, with properties like nontoxicity, biodegradability, bioadhesive, biocompatibility, and biorenewabilty which has led to its use in various fields. Thus, this study intended to evaluate the microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement and chitosan modified glass ionomer cement using a spectrophotometer. METHODS 60 teeth extracted for orthodontic propose were selected for the study and randomly divided into two groups, class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface and samples were restored with conventional glass ionomer cement and chitosan modified glass ionomer cement respectively, teeth were immersed in 0.5 % methylene blue for 24 hours and assessed using a spectrophotometer. RESULTS The data were analysed using the Unpaired T - test, and with statistical package for social sciences (SPSS) for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). The confidence interval was set at 95 % and values of P < 0.05 were interpreted as statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The study concluded that the addition of chitosan improves the mechanical properties of conventional glass ionomer cement, and a spectrophotometer can be used as a better evaluation tool in assessing microleakage. KEY WORDS Chitosan Modified GIC, Glass Ionomer Cement, Microleakage, Spectrophotometer

scholarly journals The Comparison of Biofilm Formation, Mechanical and Chemical Properties between Glass Ionomer Cement and Giomer

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 274-283
Author(s):  
Sylva Dinie Alinda ◽  
Anggraini Margono ◽  
Aditya Wisnu Putranto ◽  
Ike Dwi Maharti ◽  
Retno Amalina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Properties ◽  
Compressive Strength ◽  
Surface Morphology ◽  
Biofilm Formation ◽  
Chemical Elements ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Antibacterial Properties ◽  
Bacterial Biofilm ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Aims: The aim of this study was to compare compressive strength and its correlation with the surface morphology and chemical elements of GIC and Giomer, as well as to determine the fluoride amount effect on the bacterial biofilm formation of GIC and Giomer. Background: The liability of Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) mechanical properties is overcome with better antibacterial properties among restorative materials. Another fluoride-releasing restorative material, such as Giomer, has been discovered and is expected to overcome the issues with GIC’s mechanical properties; however, no research has been conducted related to antibacterial properties in Giomer. Objective: To compare compressive strength and its correlation with the surface morphology and chemical elements, then determine the fluoride amount effect on the bacterial biofilm formation of GIC and Giomer. Methods: Sixteen specimens of GIC and Giomer were prepared for a compressive strength measurement with the Universal Testing Machine. Sixteen specimens of GIC and Giomer were incubated for three days with the Streptococcus mutans culture at 37°C. The bacterial colonization was calculated using the Colony Forming Unit (CFU) and bacterial adhesion was calculated using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The mechanical properties’ compressive strength measurement, surface morphology, and chemical elements analyses were performed using SEM-EDX. Results: The compressive strength of Giomer was higher than GIC (P=0.001). The higher compressive strength of Giomer was reflected by a predominant regular surface, fewer voids, smaller and denser particles, and a higher content of silica and carbon. The bacterial biofilm on the surface of Giomer was higher than GIC, although there was no significant difference. GIC and Giomer have identical chemical elements: C, O, F, Na, Al, Si, P, and Ca. Conclusion: The compressive strength of Giomer is better than GIC; however, the biofilm formation of Giomer is higher than GIC, whereas GIC has a higher fluoride content but inferior in surfaces morphology characteristic

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document