scholarly journals K.E. Goldschmitt, Bossa Mundo: Brazilian Music in Transnational Media Industries

Volume ! ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 166-178
Author(s):  
Frederico Lyra de Carvalho
Keyword(s):  
Media Industries ◽  
Brazilian Music ◽  
Transnational Media

Bossa Mundo

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.E. Goldschmitt
Keyword(s):  
Local Governments ◽  
Film Music ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Political ◽  
National Brand ◽  
Brazilian Music ◽  
Media Environment ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
The Media ◽  
Rich Countries

Bossa Mundo chronicles how Brazilian music has been central to Brazil’s national brand in the United States and the United Kingdom since the late 1950s. Scholarly texts on Brazilian popular music generally focus on questions of music and national identity, and when they discuss the music’s international popularity, they keep the artists, recordings, and live performances as the focus, ignoring the process of transnational mediation. This book fills a major gap in Brazilian music studies by analyzing the consequences of moments when Brazilian music was popular in Anglophone markets, with a focus on the media industries. With subject matter as varied as jazz, film music, dance fads, DJ/remix culture, and new models of musical distribution, the book demonstrates how the mediation of Brazilian music in an increasingly crowded transnational marketplace has had lasting consequences for the creative output celebrated by Brazil as part of its national brand. Through a discussion of the political meaning of mass-mediated music in chronologically organized chapters, the book shifts the scholarly focus on the music’s transnational popularity from the scholarly framework of representing Otherness to broader considerations of a media environment where listeners and intermediaries often have differing priorities. The book provides a new model for studying music from culturally rich countries in the Global South where local governments often leverage stereotypes in their national branding project.

Drama production and audiences as ‘affective superaddressee’ in an illiberal democracy

2021 ◽  
pp. 136754942110086
Author(s):  
Siao Yuong Fong
Keyword(s):  
Writing Process ◽  
Affect Theory ◽  
Media Industries ◽  
Media Production ◽  
Television Drama ◽  
Film Research ◽  
Production Decisions ◽  
Illiberal Democracy ◽  
History Of

There is a long history of television and film research that highlights the essential roles audiences play in everyday production decisions. Based largely on Western media industries, these studies’ investigations of producer–audience relationships have revolved predominantly around the market concerns of liberal media models. So how do producer–audience relationships work when it comes to illiberal contexts of media production? Using Singapore as a case study, this article argues that existing approaches to producer–audience relations largely based on liberal media industries like Hollywood are insufficient for thinking through audience power in everyday media production in illiberal contexts. Drawing on insights from affect theory, I examine the materials gathered during an immersive ethnography of the writing process of a Singaporean television drama and propose conceptualizing audiences as an ‘affective superaddressee’, as a productive way to think about the work that situational audiences do in everyday media production in illiberal contexts.

Re-Visiting Tom O’Regan’s Australian Television Culture: Why Media Ownership, Regulation and Policy Still Matter

2021 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-23
Author(s):  
Anna Potter
Keyword(s):  
Media Industries ◽  
Media Policy ◽  
Television Studies ◽  
Media Ownership ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Analytical Frameworks

Almost 30 years after its publication, Tom O’Regan’s innovative and ambitious, multi-layered analysis of Australian television culture remains an important text for contemporary scholars of television studies, cultural and communications studies, and media industries. In this article, I re-visit the multiple lessons of value that we can take from Australian Television Culture and its distinctive analytical frameworks. Two of the book’s key areas of focus, media ownership structures, and media policy and regulation are explored further, including in work Tom and I would go on to do together.

scholarly journals Approaching media industries comparatively: A case study of streaming

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Herbert ◽  
Amanda D. Lotz ◽  
Lee Marshall
Keyword(s):  
Media Industries ◽  
Business Practices ◽  
Media Industry ◽  
Consumer Experience ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Comparative Media ◽  
The Us ◽  
Critical Media ◽  
Music Film ◽  
Industry Comparison

Although ‘streaming’ media has become increasingly common across multiple media industries, significant differences underpin the industrial practices that allow this behavior and explain discrepant experiences of internet distribution across industries. This article uses collaborative comparative media industry analysis to investigate the commonalities and variations among streaming in the US music, film, and television industries to assess the viability of theorizing the cultural implications of streaming as a consistent phenomenon across media industries. The article explores the consistencies and divergences of streaming among consumer experience, business practices, and textual implications to compare how established uses, production practices, and media content have been affected by internet distribution. Such detailed industry comparison is a novel approach, and the article also considers the methodological value of rigorous collaboration among scholars expert in different media industries. The analysis is based on industry data and practices obtained through trade press, industry reports, and interviews with media workers consistent with a critical media industries approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document