La philosophie « biographée » selon Sarah Kofman

This article examines Sarah Kofman's interpretation of Nietzsche in light of the claim that interpretation was for her both an articulation of her identity and a mode of deconstructing the very notion of identity. Faulkner argues that Kofman's work on Nietzsche can be understood as autobiographical, in that it served to mediate a relation to her self. Faulkner examines this relation with reference to Klein's model of the child's connection to its mother. By examining Kofman's later writings on Nietzsche alongside her autobiography, this article contends that Kofman's defense of anti-Semitism in Nietzsche serves to fend off her own ambivalence about being Jewish.

Download Full-text

DOUBLE ‘WHAAM’! SARAH KOFMAN ON ECCE HOMO

German Life and Letters ◽

10.1111/j.1468-0483.1995.tb01645.x ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 48 (4) ◽

pp. 441-462

Author(s):

Duncan Large

Keyword(s):

Sarah Kofman ◽

Ecce Homo

Download Full-text

Membaca 'Kebenaran' Nietzsche

MELINTAS ◽

10.26593/mel.v31i2.1622.130-153 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 31 (2) ◽

pp. 130

Author(s):

Yulius Tandyanto

Keyword(s):

Sarah Kofman ◽

Good And Evil

Nietzsche’s early work that gives wide exploration of the idea of truth is his unpublished essay entitled Wahrheit und Lüge in Ausermoralischen Sinne (1872). His controversial statement in this essay was “Truths are illusions”, opening many interpretations among scholars in understanding his position on truth. Sarah Kofman argues that it is useless to speak about truth in Nietzsche’s philosophy, for values are neither true nor false. Referring values to truth means forgetting to place oneself “beyond good and evil.” Unlike Kofman, Maudemarie Clark separates sharply Nietzsche’s critique of metaphysics and his denial of truth. Clark argues that Nietzsche rejects metaphysics and eventually overcomes it in his own work, but also that he ultimately affirms the existence of truths and therefore does not undermine his own theory when he claims truth for his own position. Clark’s strategy in defending her theses tries to explain that there is a turning (Kehre) in Nietzsche’s position. This article wants to offer an interpretation that Nietzsche does not make a new theory of truth in WL, but rather examines and constates truths that hold true. With his subtile and metaphoric style, Nietzsche might want to vivify the symbolic and figurative elements in language before the truth or reality that already escapes languages.

Download Full-text