scholarly journals A case of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) with difficulty in differential diagnosis from bow hunter’s syndrome

Nosotchu ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akihiro Nakajima ◽  
Takao Fukushima ◽  
Hiroaki Nozaki ◽  
Hideki Mori ◽  
Kunihiko Makino
Cephalalgia ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 984-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Björn Machner ◽  
Tobias Boppel ◽  
Thomas Münte

Background Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is an important differential diagnosis of singular or recurrent thunderclap headache. Prognosis is generally good, however complications of the transient segmental vasospasms of cerebral arteries such as stroke, subarachnoidal hemorrhage and brain edema may worsen the clinical outcome. Although the exact pathomechanism is still unclear, various vasoactive substances and conditions (e.g. post partum) have been identified as triggering RCVS. Cases We report on the clinical course and management of two cases of typical RCVS that were associated with two different precipitants previously not described: A gastrointestinal infection and isoflavones, which are phytoestrogens used for menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Discussion In the case of gastrointestinal infection, either systemic inflammatory processes might lead to disturbances of vascular tone, or the repetitive vomiting that resembles Valsalva manoeuvers known to trigger RCVS. In the case of isoflavone intake, it may be their estrogenic potential that induces dysregulation of cerebral arteries, a mechanism known from other states of hormonal change such as post-partum angiopathy. However, the association of both precipitating factors with RCVS in our two cases is not a proof for a causal relationship, and there may have been additional potential triggers for RCVS. Conclusion In patients with (gastrointestinal) infection and concomitant thunderclap headache, RCVS should be considered as an important differential diagnosis due to its major complications. Since RCVS may be triggered by various vasoactive substances, taking the medical history should always include over-the-counter drugs and dietary supplements (such as the isoflavones) beside the regular medication.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiyomitsu Fukaguchi ◽  
Tadahiro Goto ◽  
Hiroyuki Fukui ◽  
Ichiro Sekine ◽  
Hiroshi Yamagami

Abstract Background: In patients with thunderclap headache, reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) should be considered as a differential diagnosis. However, RCVS diagnosis in the emergency department (ED) remains challenging. This study described the clinical features of RCVS, determined the factors related to RCVS diagnosis, and suggested treatment strategies for its management. Methods: We retrospectively identified eight patients diagnosed with RCVS and reviewed their medical records. From January 2010 to March 2019, eight patients with RCVS (ages 18-69 years, 5 females) were identified. Results: The median duration from the ED visit to RCVS diagnosis was 6 days (range, 1-11 days). Of the eight patients, seven were middle-aged, six had apparent triggers, six had subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH), five had high systolic blood pressure, and none had any specific abnormality observed upon physical examination. At the ED visit, RCVS was diagnosed in only one patient with a history of RCVS. In other patients, SAH was diagnosed in two patients, and primary headache was diagnosed in four patients with negative computed tomography (CT) findings. Based on the follow-up imaging, seven of eight patients with convexal SAH were diagnosed as having RCVS (as the cause of SAH) using angiography (e.g., magnetic resonance angiography). Conclusions: RCVS with negative CT findings at the ED visit was likely to be misdiagnosed as primary headache. In patients with thunderclap headache and negative CT findings, physicians should consider RCVS as a differential diagnosis, inform patients of the risk of RCVS and the likelihood of a negative image evaluation early in the course of the disease, and carry out follow-up imaging within 2-weeks of the visit.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline Peyronnard MD ◽  
Elizabeth Leroux MD ◽  
Mehdi Gaha MD

Headache during pregnancy is a common issue for which there is a broad differential diagnosis, ranging from common benign primary headaches to certain life-threatening conditions. Although it can be a challenging diagnosis, the presence of previously unknown or new-onset headaches can alert the clinician to the possibility of an underlying secondary process, and orient the subsequent investigation.Here, we present the case of a 33-year-old migrainous patient presenting in her 36th week of pregnancy with recurrent thunderclap headaches (TCH) in association with multifocal cerebral arterial vasospasms, compatible with a diagnosis of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome. This case serves as a starting point to briefly discuss this syndrome, its particularities during pregnancy, and its management before reviewing some other important entities that can present with TCH during pregnancy. This case also underscores the paramount importance of identifying the presence of a different pattern of headaches in a patient consulting for this symptom, in order to plan further investigation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 50-57
Author(s):  
Sara Assadi ◽  
Latif Rahman ◽  
Mark Kong ◽  
Sukaina Asad

A 38-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with recurrent severe headaches. Although initial computer tomography (CT) brain imaging was unremarkable, a later CT venogram demonstrated a small subarachnoid haemorrhage. Magnetic resonance angiogram (MRA) brain imaging subsequently confirmed reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). In the acute setting, RCVS rarely falls into a differential diagnosis for headache presentations, as in this case. The radiological variability can make diagnosis of RCVS challenging. However, there are clinical consistencies that can aid physicians into accurately diagnosing RCVS. A thorough history, including a medication history, can help identify potential triggers of RCVS. As in this case, the combination of commonly used drugs, including antihistamines, provides a plausible trigger for RCVS. The direct vasoactive role of antihistamines is unclear, yet there is suggestion for its ability to potentiate the vasoactive action of other drugs. In this case we propose a causal relationship between the use of antihistamine and the development of RCVS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document