scholarly journals Analysing structural diversity of seed storage protein gene promoters: Buckwheat a case study

Fagopyrum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Upasna Chettry ◽  
Lashaihun Dohtdong ◽  
N. K. Chrungoo
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Tata Box ◽  
Proximal Promoter ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Seed Storage Protein Gene ◽  
Nucleosome Binding

Multiple sequence alignment of 5’UTR of SSP genes from accessions of Fagopyrum esculentumrevealed the invariant nature of sequences with the transcription start site at P761and TATA box located -30bp upstream the TSS. Other cis-elements identified in the sequences included the legumin box (-581, -524, -184, -135, -91), the -131 prolamin box, DOF element (-718, -649, -540,-432, -272,-225, -128) and CAAT box (-692, -530, -475, -411, -282, -168, -54). Other elements identified included those involved in abscisic acid signallingviz., ABI3 at P-470,-95,-68,RAV1 at P-694and -543and AGL15 at P-671. A comparative analysis of regulatory elements of SSP gene promoters of distantly related species the presence of five cis-regulatory elements viz. TATA BOX, E-BOX, RY- element, CAAT box and the Endosperm box, which interplay in seed specific SSP gene expression. Other modulators influencing seed specific gene expression detected in the sequences included the  ABA-responsive elements ABI3, RAV1 and AGL15 which play an integral role in seed maturation. Identification of potential nucleosome binding sites in SSP gene promoters of Cicer arietinum, Brassica napus, B. campestris, Vicia faba, and Pisum sativumat positions 78, 635, 195, 112 and 152 respectively surmises the spatial fine tuning of SSP gene transcriptional regulation in these species. On the other hand, absence of nucleosome binding sites in the promoters of Fagopyrum esculentum, Zea mays, Avena sativa, Triticum aestivum and Oryza sativamay indicate relatively easier access of transcription factors to the proximal promoter, thereby providing higher level of gene expression.

scholarly journals Identifying Transcription Regulatory Elements in the Human and Mouse Genomes Using Tissue-specific Gene Expression Profiles

2007 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Amitava Karmaker ◽  
Kihoon Yoon ◽  
Mark Doderer ◽  
Russell Kruzelock ◽  
Stephen Kwek
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Tissue Specific Gene ◽  
Human And Mouse

Summary Revealing the complex interaction between trans- and cis-regulatory elements and identifying these potential binding sites are fundamental problems in understanding gene expression. The progresses in ChIP-chip technology facilitate identifying DNA sequences that are recognized by a specific transcription factor. However, protein-DNA binding is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for transcription regulation. We need to demonstrate that their gene expression levels are correlated to further confirm regulatory relationship. Here, instead of using a linear correlation coefficient, we used a non-linear function that seems to better capture possible regulatory relationships. By analyzing tissue-specific gene expression profiles of human and mouse, we delineate a list of pairs of transcription factor and gene with highly correlated expression levels, which may have regulatory relationships. Using two closely-related species (human and mouse), we perform comparative genome analysis to cross-validate the quality of our prediction. Our findings are confirmed by matching publicly available TFBS databases (like TRANFAC and ConSite) and by reviewing biological literature. For example, according to our analysis, 80% and 85.71% of the targets genes associated with E2F5 and RELB transcription factors have the corresponding known binding sites. We also substantiated our results on some oncogenes with the biomedical literature. Moreover, we performed further analysis on them and found that BCR and DEK may be regulated by some common transcription factors. Similar results for BTG1, FCGR2B and LCK genes were also reported.

scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Genome Organization in Breast and Gynecological Cancers: How Chromatin Folding Influences Tumorigenic Transcriptional Programs

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Stephanie I. Nuñez-Olvera ◽  
Jonathan Puente-Rivera ◽  
Rosalio Ramos-Payán ◽  
Carlos Pérez-Plasencia ◽  
Yarely M. Salinas-Vera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Protein Function ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Gene Mutations ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Non Coding Rnas ◽  
Insulator Elements

A growing body of research on the transcriptome and cancer genome has demonstrated that many gynecological tumor-specific gene mutations are located in cis-regulatory elements. Through chromosomal looping, cis-regulatory elements interact which each other to control gene expression by bringing distant regulatory elements, such as enhancers and insulators, into close proximity with promoters. It is well known that chromatin connections may be disrupted in cancer cells, promoting transcriptional dysregulation and the expression of abnormal tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. In this review, we examine the roles of alterations in 3D chromatin interactions. This includes changes in CTCF protein function, cancer-risk single nucleotide polymorphisms, viral integration, and hormonal response as part of the mechanisms that lead to the acquisition of enhancers or super-enhancers. The translocation of existing enhancers, as well as enhancer loss or acquisition of insulator elements that interact with gene promoters, is also revised. Remarkably, similar processes that modify 3D chromatin contacts in gene promoters may also influence the expression of non-coding RNAs, such as long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), which have emerged as key regulators of gene expression in a variety of cancers, including gynecological malignancies.

scholarly journals Targeted optimization of regulatory DNA sequences with neural editing architectures

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anvita Gupta ◽  
Anshul Kundaje
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Network Architecture ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Biological Knowledge ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Regulatory Dna Sequences ◽  
Regulatory Dna

AbstractTargeted optimizing of existing DNA sequences for useful properties, has the potential to enable several synthetic biology applications from modifying DNA to treat genetic disorders to designing regulatory elements to fine tune context-specific gene expression. Current approaches for targeted genome editing are largely based on prior biological knowledge or ad-hoc rules. Few if any machine learning approaches exist for targeted optimization of regulatory DNA sequences.Here, we propose a novel generative neural network architecture for targeted DNA sequence editing – the EDA architecture – consisting of an encoder, decoder, and analyzer. We showcase the use of EDA to optimize regulatory DNA sequences to bind to the transcription factor SPI1. Compared to other state-of-the-art approaches such as a textual variational autoencoder and rule-based editing, EDA significantly improves predicted binding of SPI1 of genomic sequences with the minimal set of edits. We also use EDA to design regulatory elements with optimized grammars of CREB1 binding sites that can tune reporter expression levels as measured by massively parallel reporter assays (MPRA). We analyze the properties of the binding sites in the edited sequences and find patterns that are consistent with previously reported grammatical rules which tie gene expression to CRE binding site density, spacing and affinity.

scholarly journals DNA Methylation of Enhancer Elements in Myeloid Neoplasms: Think Outside the Promoters?

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ordoñez ◽  
Martínez-Calle ◽  
Agirre ◽  
Prosper
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Epigenetic Modification ◽  
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Fine Tuning ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Regulatory Regions ◽  
Genome Wide

Gene regulation through DNA methylation is a well described phenomenon that has a prominent role in physiological and pathological cell-states. This epigenetic modification is usually grouped in regions denominated CpG islands, which frequently co-localize with gene promoters, silencing the transcription of those genes. Recent genome-wide DNA methylation studies have challenged this paradigm, demonstrating that DNA methylation of regulatory regions outside promoters is able to influence cell-type specific gene expression programs under physiologic or pathologic conditions. Coupling genome-wide DNA methylation assays with histone mark annotation has allowed for the identification of specific epigenomic changes that affect enhancer regulatory regions, revealing an additional layer of complexity to the epigenetic regulation of gene expression. In this review, we summarize the novel evidence for the molecular and biological regulation of DNA methylation in enhancer regions and the dynamism of these changes contributing to the fine-tuning of gene expression. We also analyze the contribution of enhancer DNA methylation on the expression of relevant genes in acute myeloid leukemia and chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. The characterization of the aberrant enhancer DNA methylation provides not only a novel pathogenic mechanism for different tumors but also highlights novel potential therapeutic targets for myeloid derived neoplasms.

scholarly journals The regulatory genome of the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae: integrating chromatin accessibility and gene expression

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
José L Ruiz ◽  
Lisa C Ranford-Cartwright ◽  
Elena Gómez-Díaz
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Regulation ◽  
Anopheles Gambiae ◽  
Mosquito Control ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Chromatin Accessibility ◽  
Malaria Vectors ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Mosquito Vector ◽  
Human Malaria

Abstract Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes are primary human malaria vectors, but we know very little about their mechanisms of transcriptional regulation. We profiled chromatin accessibility by the assay for transposase-accessible chromatin by sequencing (ATAC-seq) in laboratory-reared A. gambiae mosquitoes experimentally infected with the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. By integrating ATAC-seq, RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data, we showed a positive correlation between accessibility at promoters and introns, gene expression and active histone marks. By comparing expression and chromatin structure patterns in different tissues, we were able to infer cis-regulatory elements controlling tissue-specific gene expression and to predict the in vivo binding sites of relevant transcription factors. The ATAC-seq assay also allowed the precise mapping of active regulatory regions, including novel transcription start sites and enhancers that were annotated to mosquito immune-related genes. Not only is this study important for advancing our understanding of mechanisms of transcriptional regulation in the mosquito vector of human malaria, but the information we produced also has great potential for developing new mosquito-control and anti-malaria strategies.

A Global Vista of the Epigenomic State of the Mouse Submandibular Gland

2021 ◽  
pp. 002203452110120
Author(s):  
C. Gluck ◽  
S. Min ◽  
A. Oyelakin ◽  
M. Che ◽  
E. Horeth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcriptional Control ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Global Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Submandibular Salivary Gland ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing

The parotid, submandibular, and sublingual glands represent a trio of oral secretory glands whose primary function is to produce saliva, facilitate digestion of food, provide protection against microbes, and maintain oral health. While recent studies have begun to shed light on the global gene expression patterns and profiles of salivary glands, particularly those of mice, relatively little is known about the location and identity of transcriptional control elements. Here we have established the epigenomic landscape of the mouse submandibular salivary gland (SMG) by performing chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing experiments for 4 key histone marks. Our analysis of the comprehensive SMG data sets and comparisons with those from other adult organs have identified critical enhancers and super-enhancers of the mouse SMG. By further integrating these findings with complementary RNA-sequencing based gene expression data, we have unearthed a number of molecular regulators such as members of the Fox family of transcription factors that are enriched and likely to be functionally relevant for SMG biology. Overall, our studies provide a powerful atlas of cis-regulatory elements that can be leveraged for better understanding the transcriptional control mechanisms of the mouse SMG, discovery of novel genetic switches, and modulating tissue-specific gene expression in a targeted fashion.

Androgen receptor: acting in the three-dimensional chromatin landscape of prostate cancer cells

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Harri Makkonen ◽  
Jorma J. Palvimo
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Loop Formation ◽  
Prostate Cancer Cells

AbstractAndrogen receptor (AR) acts as a hormone-controlled transcription factor that conveys the messages of both natural and synthetic androgens to the level of genes and gene programs. Defective AR signaling leads to a wide array of androgen insensitivity disorders, and deregulated AR function, in particular overexpression of AR, is involved in the growth and progression of prostate cancer. Classic models of AR action view AR-binding sites as upstream regulatory elements in gene promoters or their proximity. However, recent wider genomic screens indicate that AR target genes are commonly activated through very distal chromatin-binding sites. This highlights the importance of long-range chromatin regulation of transcription by the AR, shifting the focus from the linear gene models to three-dimensional models of AR target genes and gene programs. The capability of AR to regulate promoters from long distances in the chromatin is particularly important when evaluating the role of AR in the regulation of genes in malignant prostate cells that frequently show striking genomic aberrations, especially gene fusions. Therefore, in addition to the mechanisms of DNA loop formation between the enhancer bound ARs and the transcription apparatus at the target core promoter, the mechanisms insulating distally bound ARs from promiscuously making contacts and activating other than their normal target gene promoters are critical for proper physiological regulation and thus currently under intense investigation. This review discusses the current knowledge about the AR action in the context of gene aberrations and the three-dimensional chromatin landscape of prostate cancer cells.

scholarly journals Evolution of mouse circadian enhancers from transposable elements

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julius Judd ◽  
Hayley Sanderson ◽  
Cédric Feschotte
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transposable Elements ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Mouse Liver ◽  
Integration Site ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Circadian Gene ◽  
Binding Motifs ◽  
Reporter Assays

Abstract Background Transposable elements are increasingly recognized as a source of cis-regulatory variation. Previous studies have revealed that transposons are often bound by transcription factors and some have been co-opted into functional enhancers regulating host gene expression. However, the process by which transposons mature into complex regulatory elements, like enhancers, remains poorly understood. To investigate this process, we examined the contribution of transposons to the cis-regulatory network controlling circadian gene expression in the mouse liver, a well-characterized network serving an important physiological function. Results ChIP-seq analyses reveal that transposons and other repeats contribute ~ 14% of the binding sites for core circadian regulators (CRs) including BMAL1, CLOCK, PER1/2, and CRY1/2, in the mouse liver. RSINE1, an abundant murine-specific SINE, is the only transposon family enriched for CR binding sites across all datasets. Sequence analyses and reporter assays reveal that the circadian regulatory activity of RSINE1 stems from the presence of imperfect CR binding motifs in the ancestral RSINE1 sequence. These motifs matured into canonical motifs through point mutations after transposition. Furthermore, maturation occurred preferentially within elements inserted in the proximity of ancestral CR binding sites. RSINE1 also acquired motifs that recruit nuclear receptors known to cooperate with CRs to regulate circadian gene expression specifically in the liver. Conclusions Our results suggest that the birth of enhancers from transposons is predicated both by the sequence of the transposon and by the cis-regulatory landscape surrounding their genomic integration site.

Gene-regulatory elements may change the amount, timing, or location of gene expression, cis-Regulation therapy platforms might become a gene therapy to treat many genetic diseases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moataz Dowaidar
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Genetic Diseases ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Cis Regulation ◽  
Gene Regulatory Elements ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Gene Expression Levels

Changes in gene expression levels above or below a particular threshold may have a dramatic impact on phenotypes, leading to a wide spectrum of human illnesses. Gene-regulatory elements, also known as cis-regulatory elements (CREs), may change the amount, timing, or location (cell/tissue type) of gene expression, whereas mutations in a gene's coding sequence may result in lower or higher gene expression levels resulting in protein loss or gain. Loss-of-function mutations in both genes produce recessive human illness, while haploinsufficient mutations in 65 genes are also known to be deleterious due to function gain, according to the ClinVar1 and ClinGen3 databases. CREs are promoters living near to a gene's transcription start site and switching it on at predefined times, places, and levels. Other distal CREs, like enhancers and silencers, are temporal and tissue-specific control promoters. Enhancers activate promoters, commonly referred to as "promoters," whereas silencers turn them off. Insulators also restrict promiscuous interactions between enhancers and gene promoters. Systematic genomic approaches can help understand the cis-regulatory circuitry of gene expression by highly detecting and functionally defining these CREs. This includes the new use of CRISPR–CRISPR-associated protein 9 (CRISPR–Cas9) and other editing approaches to discover CREs. Cis-Regulation therapy (CRT) provides many promises to heal human ailments. CRT may be used to upregulate or downregulate disease-causing genes due to lower or higher levels of expression, and it may also be used to precisely adjust the expression of genes that assist in alleviating disease features. CRT may employ proteins that generate epigenetic modifications like methylation, histone modification, or gene expression regulation looping. Weighing CRT's advantages and downsides against alternative treatment methods is crucial. CRT platforms might become a practical technique to treat many genetic diseases that now lack treatment alternatives if academics, patient communities, clinicians, regulators and industry work together.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document