Revealing Plasmonic Property Similarities and Differences Between a Nanoparticle on a Metallic Mirror and Free Space Dimer Nanoparticle

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 313-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasanthan Devaraj ◽  
Na-Na Jeong ◽  
Jong-Min Lee ◽  
Yoon-Hwae Hwang ◽  
Jong-Ryeul Sohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Free Space ◽  
Plasmonic Property ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Metallic Mirror

Natural tilings and free space in zeolites: models, statistics, correlations, prediction

2019 ◽  
Vol 234 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 421-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga A. Blatova ◽  
Andrey A. Golov ◽  
Vladislav A. Blatov
Keyword(s):  
Free Space ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Zeolite Framework ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Modeling And Prediction ◽  
Packing Model ◽  
Similarities And Differences

Abstract We review two concepts in description of free space in the zeolite-like frameworks: topological (natural tiling) and geometrical-topological (Voronoi net). Advantages and disadvantages as well as similarities and differences of both concepts are discussed. We also consider the packing model of zeolite framework assemblage, which is derived from the natural tiling approach. New statistical data are given for natural tilings and Voronoi models of all known 239 zeolite frameworks. A route to modeling and prediction of new zeolite frameworks is outlined.

scholarly journals Single-Photon Single-Ion Interaction in Free Space Configuration in Front of a Parabolic Mirror

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (04) ◽  
pp. 1250023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Stobińska ◽  
Robert Alicki
Keyword(s):  
Free Space ◽  
Emission Rate ◽  
Single Photon ◽  
Polarization Degree ◽  
Single Photons ◽  
Parabolic Mirror ◽  
Mode Structure ◽  
Spontaneous Emission Rate ◽  
Parabolic Boundary ◽  
Metallic Mirror

The efficient interaction between single photons and single matter objects in free space is of key importance for quantum technologies. An experimental setup for testing this possibility involves single two-level ion trapped at the focus of a parabolic metallic mirror. We study the conditions for the setup, under which the assumption about the free-space mode structure of the radiation field in the vicinity of the atom is justified. In our analysis we apply vectorial properties of light by including the polarization degree of freedom. We look for possible changes in the spontaneous emission rate of the atom resulting from the presence of the parabolic boundary conditions.

Orosensory Perception, Speech Production, and Deafness

1973 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milo E. Bishop ◽  
Robert L. Ringel ◽  
Arthur S. House
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
Speech Production ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
The Other ◽  
Functional Disorders ◽  
Form Discrimination ◽  
School Subjects ◽  
Oral Form ◽  
Similarities And Differences

The oral form-discrimination abilities of 18 orally educated and oriented deaf high school subjects were determined and compared to those of manually educated and oriented deaf subjects and normal-hearing subjects. The similarities and differences among the responses of the three groups were discussed and then compared to responses elicited from subjects with functional disorders of articulation. In general, the discrimination scores separated the manual deaf from the other two groups, particularly when differences in form shapes were involved in the test. The implications of the results for theories relating orosensory-discrimination abilities are discussed. It is postulated that, while a failure in oroperceptual functioning may lead to disorders of articulation, a failure to use the oral mechanism for speech activities, even in persons with normal orosensory capabilities, may result in poor performance on oroperceptual tasks.

Animals as Social Objects

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-217 ◽  
Author(s):  
Verónica Sevillano ◽  
Susan T. Fiske
Keyword(s):  
Social Perception ◽  
Animal Species ◽  
Social Groups ◽  
Social Responses ◽  
Content Model ◽  
Stereotype Content ◽  
Nonhuman Animals ◽  
Behavioral Tendencies ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
Sphere Of Influence

Abstract. Nonhuman animals are typically excluded from the scope of social psychology. This article presents animals as social objects – targets of human social responses – overviewing the similarities and differences with human targets. The focus here is on perceiving animal species as social groups. Reflecting the two fundamental dimensions of humans’ social cognition – perceived warmth (benign or ill intent) and competence (high or low ability), proposed within the Stereotype Content Model ( Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002 ) – animal stereotypes are identified, together with associated prejudices and behavioral tendencies. In line with human intergroup threats, both realistic and symbolic threats associated with animals are reviewed. As a whole, animals appear to be social perception targets within the human sphere of influence and a valid topic for research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document