scholarly journals A deep learning based automatic segmentation approach for anatomical structures in intensity modulation radiotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 7506-7524
Author(s):  
Han Zhou ◽  
◽  
Yikun Li ◽  
Ying Gu ◽  
Zetian Shen ◽  
...  

<abstract> <sec><title>Objective</title><p>To evaluate the automatic segmentation approach for organ at risk (OARs) and compare the parameters of dose volume histogram (DVH) in radiotherapy. Methodology: Thirty-three patients were selected to contour OARs using automatic segmentation approach which based on U-Net, applying them to a number of the nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), breast, and rectal cancer respectively. The automatic contours were transferred to the Pinnacle System to evaluate contour accuracy and compare the DVH parameters.</p> </sec> <sec><title>Results</title><p>The time for manual contour was 56.5 ± 9, 23.12 ± 4.23 and 45.23 ± 2.39min for the OARs of NPC, breast and rectal cancer, and for automatic contour was 1.5 ± 0.23, 1.45 ± 0.78 and 1.8 ± 0.56 min. Automatic contours of Eye with the best Dice-similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.907 ± 0.02 while with the poorest DSC of 0.459 ± 0.112 of Spinal Cord for NPC; And Lung with the best DSC of 0.944 ± 0.03 while with the poorest DSC of 0.709 ± 0.1 of Spinal Cord for breast; And Bladder with the best DSC of 0.91 ± 0.04 while with the poorest DSC of 0.43 ± 0.1 of Femoral heads for rectal cancer. The contours of Spinal Cord in H &amp; N had poor results due to the division of the medulla oblongata. The contours of Femoral head, which different from what we expect, also due to manual contour result in poor DSC.</p> </sec> <sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>The automatic contour approach based deep learning method with sufficient accuracy for research purposes. However, the value of DSC does not fully reflect the accuracy of dose distribution, but can cause dose changes due to the changes in the OARs volume and DSC from the data. Considering the significantly time-saving and good performance in partial OARs, the automatic contouring also plays a supervisory role.</p> </sec> </abstract>

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang-Heon Lim ◽  
Young Jae Kim ◽  
Yeon-Ho Park ◽  
Doojin Kim ◽  
Kwang Gi Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract Pancreas segmentation is necessary for observing lesions, analyzing anatomical structures, and predicting patient prognosis. Therefore, various studies have designed segmentation models based on convolutional neural networks for pancreas segmentation. However, the deep learning approach is limited by a lack of data, and studies conducted on a large computed tomography dataset are scarce. Therefore, this study aims to perform deep-learning-based semantic segmentation on 1,006 participants and evaluate the automatic segmentation performance of the pancreas via four individual three-dimensional segmentation networks. In this study, we performed internal validation with 1,006 patients and external validation using the Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) pancreas dataset. We obtained mean precision, recall, and dice similarity coefficients of 0.869, 0.842, and 0.842, respectively, for internal validation via a relevant approach among the four deep learning networks. Using the external dataset, the deep learning network achieved mean precision, recall, and dice similarity coefficients of 0.779, 0.749, and 0.735, respectively. We expect that generalized deep-learning-based systems can assist clinical decisions by providing accurate pancreatic segmentation and quantitative information of the pancreas for abdominal computed tomography.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbo Guo ◽  
Jiazhou Wang ◽  
Xiang Xia ◽  
Yang Zhong ◽  
Jiayuan Peng ◽  
...  

Abstract PurposeTo investigate the dosimetric impact of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk (OARs) on nasopharyngeal and rectal cancer.Methods and MaterialsTwenty patients, including ten nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients and ten rectal cancer patients, who received radiotherapy in our department were enrolled in this study. Two deep learning-based auto-segmentation systems, including an in-house developed system (FD) and a commercial product (UIH), were used to generate two auto-segmented OARs sets (OAR_FD and OAR_UIH). Treatment plans based on auto-segmented OARs and following our clinical requirements were generated for each patient on each OARs set (Plan_FD and Plan_UIH). Geometric metrics (Hausdorff distance (HD), mean distance to agreement (MDA), the Dice similarity coefficient (DICE) and the Jaccard index) were calculated for geometric evaluation. The dosimetric impact was evaluated by comparing Plan_FD and Plan_UIH to original clinically approved plans (Plan_Manual) with dose-volume indices and 3D gamma pass rates. Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between dosimetric deviation and geometric metrics.ResultsFD and UIH could provide similar geometric performance in parotids, temporal lobes, lens, and eyes (DICE, p > 0.05). OAR_FD had better geometric performance in the optic nerves, oral cavity, larynx, and femoral heads (DICE, p < 0.05). OAR_UIH had better geometric performance in the bladder (DICE, p < 0.05). In dosimetric analysis, both Plan_FD and Plan_UIH had nonsignificant dosimetric differences compared to Plan_Manual for most PTV and OARs dose-volume indices. The only significant dosimetric difference was the Dmax of the left temporal lobe for Plan_FD vs. Plan_Manual (p = 0.05). Only one significant correlation was found between the mean dose of the femoral head and its HD index (R = 0.4, p = 0.01).ConclusionsDeep learning-based OARs auto-segmentation for NPC and rectal cancer has a nonsignificant impact on most PTV and OARs dose-volume indices. Correlations between the auto-segmentation geometric metric and dosimetric difference were not observed for most OARs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbo Guo ◽  
Jiazhou Wang ◽  
Xiang Xia ◽  
Yang Zhong ◽  
Jiayuan Peng ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose To investigate the dosimetric impact of deep learning-based auto-segmentation of organs at risk (OARs) on nasopharyngeal and rectal cancer. Methods and materials Twenty patients, including ten nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients and ten rectal cancer patients, who received radiotherapy in our department were enrolled in this study. Two deep learning-based auto-segmentation systems, including an in-house developed system (FD) and a commercial product (UIH), were used to generate two auto-segmented OARs sets (OAR_FD and OAR_UIH). Treatment plans based on auto-segmented OARs and following our clinical requirements were generated for each patient on each OARs sets (Plan_FD and Plan_UIH). Geometric metrics (Hausdorff distance (HD), mean distance to agreement (MDA), the Dice similarity coefficient (DICE) and the Jaccard index) were calculated for geometric evaluation. The dosimetric impact was evaluated by comparing Plan_FD and Plan_UIH to original clinically approved plans (Plan_Manual) with dose-volume metrics and 3D gamma analysis. Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed to investigate the correlation between dosimetric difference and geometric metrics. Results FD and UIH could provide similar geometric performance in parotids, temporal lobes, lens, and eyes (DICE, p > 0.05). OAR_FD had better geometric performance in the optic nerves, oral cavity, larynx, and femoral heads (DICE, p < 0.05). OAR_UIH had better geometric performance in the bladder (DICE, p < 0.05). In dosimetric analysis, both Plan_FD and Plan_UIH had nonsignificant dosimetric differences compared to Plan_Manual for most PTV and OARs dose-volume metrics. The only significant dosimetric difference was the max dose of the left temporal lobe for Plan_FD vs. Plan_Manual (p = 0.05). Only one significant correlation was found between the mean dose of the femoral head and its HD index (R = 0.4, p = 0.01), there is no OARs showed strong correlation between its dosimetric difference and all of four geometric metrics. Conclusions Deep learning-based OARs auto-segmentation for NPC and rectal cancer has a nonsignificant impact on most PTV and OARs dose-volume metrics. Correlations between the auto-segmentation geometric metric and dosimetric difference were not observed for most OARs.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
Zixing Huang ◽  
Jian Zhao ◽  
Du He ◽  
Mou Li ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared Hamwood ◽  
Beat Schmutz ◽  
Michael J. Collins ◽  
Mark C. Allenby ◽  
David Alonso-Caneiro

AbstractThis paper proposes a fully automatic method to segment the inner boundary of the bony orbit in two different image modalities: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). The method, based on a deep learning architecture, uses two fully convolutional neural networks in series followed by a graph-search method to generate a boundary for the orbit. When compared to human performance for segmentation of both CT and MRI data, the proposed method achieves high Dice coefficients on both orbit and background, with scores of 0.813 and 0.975 in CT images and 0.930 and 0.995 in MRI images, showing a high degree of agreement with a manual segmentation by a human expert. Given the volumetric characteristics of these imaging modalities and the complexity and time-consuming nature of the segmentation of the orbital region in the human skull, it is often impractical to manually segment these images. Thus, the proposed method provides a valid clinical and research tool that performs similarly to the human observer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. S949
Author(s):  
L. Bokhorst ◽  
M.H.F. Savenije ◽  
M.P.W. Intven ◽  
C.A.T. Van den Berg

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5488
Author(s):  
Wei Ping Hsia ◽  
Siu Lun Tse ◽  
Chia Jen Chang ◽  
Yu Len Huang

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the accuracy of the optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurement of choroidal thickness in healthy eyes using a deep-learning method with the Mask R-CNN model. Thirty EDI-OCT of thirty patients were enrolled. A mask region-based convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN) model composed of deep residual network (ResNet) and feature pyramid networks (FPNs) with standard convolution and fully connected heads for mask and box prediction, respectively, was used to automatically depict the choroid layer. The average choroidal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness were measured. The results of this study showed that ResNet 50 layers deep (R50) model and ResNet 101 layers deep (R101). R101 U R50 (OR model) demonstrated the best accuracy with an average error of 4.85 pixels and 4.86 pixels, respectively. The R101 ∩ R50 (AND model) took the least time with an average execution time of 4.6 s. Mask-RCNN models showed a good prediction rate of choroidal layer with accuracy rates of 90% and 89.9% for average choroidal thickness and average subfoveal choroidal thickness, respectively. In conclusion, the deep-learning method using the Mask-RCNN model provides a faster and accurate measurement of choroidal thickness. Comparing with manual delineation, it provides better effectiveness, which is feasible for clinical application and larger scale of research on choroid.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed M Adil ◽  
Lefko T Charalambous ◽  
Kelly R Murphy ◽  
Shervin Rahimpour ◽  
Stephen C Harward ◽  
...  

Abstract INTRODUCTION Opioid misuse persists as a public health crisis affecting approximately one in four Americans.1 Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a neuromodulation strategy to treat chronic pain, with one goal being decreased opioid consumption. Accurate prognostication about SCS success is key in optimizing surgical decision making for both physicians and patients. Deep learning, using neural network models such as the multilayer perceptron (MLP), enables accurate prediction of non-linear patterns and has widespread applications in healthcare. METHODS The IBM MarketScan® (IBM) database was queried for all patients ≥ 18 years old undergoing SCS from January 2010 to December 2015. Patients were categorized into opioid dose groups as follows: No Use, ≤ 20 morphine milligram equivalents (MME), 20–50 MME, 50–90 MME, and &gt;90 MME. We defined “opiate weaning” as moving into a lower opioid dose group (or remaining in the No Use group) during the 12 months following permanent SCS implantation. After pre-processing, there were 62 predictors spanning demographics, comorbidities, and pain medication history. We compared an MLP with four hidden layers to the LR model with L1 regularization. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with 5-fold nested cross-validation. RESULTS Ultimately, 6,124 patients were included, of which 77% had used opioids for &gt;90 days within the 1-year pre-SCS and 72% had used &gt;5 types of medications during the 90 days prior to SCS. The mean age was 56 ± 13 years old. Collectively, 2,037 (33%) patients experienced opiate weaning. The AUC was 0.74 for the MLP and 0.73 for the LR model. CONCLUSION To our knowledge, we present the first use of deep learning to predict opioid weaning after SCS. Model performance was slightly better than regularized LR. Future efforts should focus on optimization of neural network architecture and hyperparameters to further improve model performance. Models should also be calibrated and externally validated on an independent dataset. Ultimately, such tools may assist both physicians and patients in predicting opioid dose reduction after SCS.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document