scholarly journals Roman domination in direct product graphs and rooted product graphs

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (10) ◽  
pp. 11084-11096
Author(s):  
Abel Cabrera Martínez ◽  
◽  
Iztok Peterin ◽  
Ismael G. Yero ◽  
◽  
...  

<abstract><p>Let $ G $ be a graph with vertex set $ V(G) $. A function $ f:V(G)\rightarrow \{0, 1, 2\} $ is a Roman dominating function on $ G $ if every vertex $ v\in V(G) $ for which $ f(v) = 0 $ is adjacent to at least one vertex $ u\in V(G) $ such that $ f(u) = 2 $. The Roman domination number of $ G $ is the minimum weight $ \omega(f) = \sum_{x\in V(G)}f(x) $ among all Roman dominating functions $ f $ on $ G $. In this article we study the Roman domination number of direct product graphs and rooted product graphs. Specifically, we give several tight lower and upper bounds for the Roman domination number of direct product graphs involving some parameters of the factors, which include the domination, (total) Roman domination, and packing numbers among others. On the other hand, we prove that the Roman domination number of rooted product graphs can attain only three possible values, which depend on the order, the domination number, and the Roman domination number of the factors in the product. In addition, theoretical characterizations of the classes of rooted product graphs achieving each of these three possible values are given.</p></abstract>

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel Cabrera Martínez ◽  
Suitberto Cabrera García ◽  
Andrés Carrión García

Let G be a graph without isolated vertices. A function f : V ( G ) → { 0 , 1 , 2 } is a total Roman dominating function on G if every vertex v ∈ V ( G ) for which f ( v ) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex u ∈ V ( G ) such that f ( u ) = 2 , and if the subgraph induced by the set { v ∈ V ( G ) : f ( v ) ≥ 1 } has no isolated vertices. The total Roman domination number of G, denoted γ t R ( G ) , is the minimum weight ω ( f ) = ∑ v ∈ V ( G ) f ( v ) among all total Roman dominating functions f on G. In this article we obtain new tight lower and upper bounds for γ t R ( G ) which improve the well-known bounds 2 γ ( G ) ≤ γ t R ( G ) ≤ 3 γ ( G ) , where γ ( G ) represents the classical domination number. In addition, we characterize the graphs that achieve equality in the previous lower bound and we give necessary conditions for the graphs which satisfy the equality in the upper bound above.


Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1318
Author(s):  
Zheng Kou ◽  
Saeed Kosari ◽  
Guoliang Hao ◽  
Jafar Amjadi ◽  
Nesa Khalili

This paper is devoted to the study of the quadruple Roman domination in trees, and it is a contribution to the Special Issue “Theoretical computer science and discrete mathematics” of Symmetry. For any positive integer k, a [k]-Roman dominating function ([k]-RDF) of a simple graph G is a function from the vertex set V of G to the set {0,1,2,…,k+1} if for any vertex u∈V with f(u)<k, ∑x∈N(u)∪{u}f(x)≥|{x∈N(u):f(x)≥1}|+k, where N(u) is the open neighborhood of u. The weight of a [k]-RDF is the value Σv∈Vf(v). The minimum weight of a [k]-RDF is called the [k]-Roman domination number γ[kR](G) of G. In this paper, we establish sharp upper and lower bounds on γ[4R](T) for nontrivial trees T and characterize extremal trees.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (03) ◽  
pp. 1850034 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Amjadi ◽  
M. Soroudi

Let [Formula: see text] be a finite simple digraph with vertex set [Formula: see text] and arc set [Formula: see text]. A twin signed total Roman dominating function (TSTRDF) on the digraph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] satisfying the conditions that (i) [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for each [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] (respectively [Formula: see text]) consists of all in-neighbors (respectively out-neighbors) of [Formula: see text], and (ii) every vertex [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text] has an in-neighbor [Formula: see text] and an out-neighbor [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. The weight of an TSTRDF [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]. The twin signed total Roman domination number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is the minimum weight of an TSTRDF on [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we initiate the study of twin signed total Roman domination in digraphs and we present some sharp bounds on [Formula: see text]. In addition, we determine the twin signed Roman domination number of some classes of digraphs.


Author(s):  
Hossein Abdollahzadeh Ahangar ◽  
Jafar Amjadi ◽  
Mustapha Chellali ◽  
S. Kosari ◽  
Vladimir Samodivkin ◽  
...  

Let $G=(V,E)$ be a simple graph with vertex set $V$ and edge set $E$. A mixed Roman dominating function (MRDF) of $G$ is a function $f:V\cup E\rightarrow \{0,1,2\}$ satisfying the condition that every element $x\in V\cup E$ for which $f(x)=0$ is adjacent or incident to at least one element $% y\in V\cup E$ for which $f(y)=2$. The weight of a mixed Roman dominating function $f$ is $\omega (f)=\sum_{x\in V\cup E}f(x)$. The mixed Roman domination number $\gamma _{R}^{\ast }(G)$ of $G$ is the minimum weight of a mixed Roman dominating function of $G$. We first show that the problem of computing $\gamma _{R}^{\ast }(G)$ is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and then we present upper and lower bounds on the mixed Roman domination number, some of them are for the class of trees.


2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Mahmoud Sheikholeslami ◽  
Asghar Bodaghli ◽  
Lutz Volkmann

Let $D$ be a finite simple digraph with vertex set $V(D)$ and arc set $A(D)$. A twin signed Roman dominating function (TSRDF) on the digraph $D$ is a function $f:V(D)\rightarrow\{-1,1,2\}$ satisfying the conditions that (i) $\sum_{x\in N^-[v]}f(x)\ge 1$ and $\sum_{x\in N^+[v]}f(x)\ge 1$ for each $v\in V(D)$, where $N^-[v]$ (resp. $N^+[v]$) consists of $v$ and all in-neighbors (resp. out-neighbors) of $v$, and (ii) every vertex $u$ for which $f(u)=-1$ has an in-neighbor $v$ and an out-neighbor $w$ for which $f(v)=f(w)=2$. The weight of an TSRDF $f$ is $\omega(f)=\sum_{v\in V(D)}f(v)$. The twin signed Roman domination number $\gamma_{sR}^*(D)$ of $D$ is the minimum weight of an TSRDF on $D$. In this paper, we initiate the study of twin signed Roman domination in digraphs and we present some sharp bounds on $\gamma_{sR}^*(D)$. In addition, we determine the twin signed Roman domination number of some classes of digraphs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850020 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Amjadi

Let [Formula: see text] be a finite simple digraph with vertex set [Formula: see text]. A signed total Roman dominating function (STRDF) on a digraph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] such that (i) [Formula: see text] for every [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] consists of all inner neighbors of [Formula: see text], and (ii) every vertex [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text] has an inner neighbor [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text]. The weight of an STRDF [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]. The signed total Roman domination number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is the minimum weight of an STRDF on [Formula: see text]. A set [Formula: see text] of distinct STRDFs on [Formula: see text] with the property that [Formula: see text] for each [Formula: see text] is called a signed total Roman dominating family (STRD family) (of functions) on [Formula: see text]. The maximum number of functions in an STRD family on [Formula: see text] is the signed total Roman domatic number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we initiate the study of signed total Roman domatic number in digraphs and we present some sharp bounds for [Formula: see text]. In addition, we determine the signed total Roman domatic number of some classes of digraphs.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (04) ◽  
pp. 1850052
Author(s):  
J. Amjadi ◽  
S. M. Sheikholeslami ◽  
M. Valinavaz ◽  
N. Dehgardi

Let [Formula: see text] be a simple graph with vertex set [Formula: see text] and edge set [Formula: see text]. A Roman dominating function on a graph [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] satisfying the condition that every vertex [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least one vertex [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text]. A Roman dominating function [Formula: see text] is called an independent Roman dominating function if the set of all vertices with positive weights is an independent set. The weight of an independent Roman dominating function [Formula: see text] is the value [Formula: see text]. The independent Roman domination number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text], is the minimum weight of an independent Roman dominating function on [Formula: see text]. A subset [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is a 2-independent set of [Formula: see text] if every vertex of [Formula: see text] has at most one neighbor in [Formula: see text]. The maximum cardinality of a 2-independent set of [Formula: see text] is the 2-independence number [Formula: see text]. These two parameters are incomparable in general, however, we show that for any tree [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and we characterize all trees attaining the equality.


Author(s):  
Davood Bakhshesh

Let [Formula: see text] be a graph with the vertex set [Formula: see text]. A function [Formula: see text] is called a Roman dominating function of [Formula: see text], if every vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least one vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. The weight of a Roman dominating function [Formula: see text] is equal to [Formula: see text]. The minimum weight of a Roman dominating function of [Formula: see text] is called the Roman domination number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we initiate the study of a variant of Roman dominating functions. A function [Formula: see text] is called an isolate Roman dominating function of [Formula: see text], if [Formula: see text] is a Roman dominating function and there is a vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text] which is not adjacent to any vertex [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. The minimum weight of an isolate Roman dominating function of [Formula: see text] is called the isolate Roman domination number of [Formula: see text], denoted by [Formula: see text]. We present some upper bound on the isolate Roman domination number of a graph [Formula: see text] in terms of its Roman domination number and its domination number. Moreover, we present some classes of graphs [Formula: see text] with [Formula: see text]. Finally, we show that the decision problem associated with the isolate Roman dominating functions is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and chordal graphs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (02) ◽  
pp. 2050024
Author(s):  
Xia Hong ◽  
Tianhu Yu ◽  
Zhengbang Zha ◽  
Huihui Zhang

Let [Formula: see text] be a simple graph with vertex set [Formula: see text] and edge set [Formula: see text]. A signed Roman dominating function (SRDF) of [Formula: see text] is a function [Formula: see text] satisfying the conditions that (i) [Formula: see text] for each [Formula: see text], where [Formula: see text] is the set, called closed neighborhood of [Formula: see text], consists of [Formula: see text] and the vertex of [Formula: see text] adjacent to [Formula: see text] (ii) every vertex [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text] is adjacent to at least one vertex [Formula: see text] for which [Formula: see text]. The weight of a SRDF [Formula: see text] is [Formula: see text]. The signed Roman domination number [Formula: see text] of [Formula: see text] is the minimum weight of a SRDF of [Formula: see text]. In this paper, we determine the exact values of signed Roman domination number of spider and double star. Specially, one of them generalizes the known result.


Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abel Cabrera Martínez ◽  
Suitberto Cabrera García ◽  
Andrés Carrión García ◽  
Frank A. Hernández Mira

Let G be a graph with no isolated vertex and f:V(G)→{0,1,2} a function. If f satisfies that every vertex in the set {v∈V(G):f(v)=0} is adjacent to at least one vertex in the set {v∈V(G):f(v)=2}, and if the subgraph induced by the set {v∈V(G):f(v)≥1} has no isolated vertex, then we say that f is a total Roman dominating function on G. The minimum weight ω(f)=∑v∈V(G)f(v) among all total Roman dominating functions f on G is the total Roman domination number of G. In this article we study this parameter for the rooted product graphs. Specifically, we obtain closed formulas and tight bounds for the total Roman domination number of rooted product graphs in terms of domination invariants of the factor graphs involved in this product.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document