scholarly journals A semilinear problem with a gradient term in the nonlinearity

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Ignacio Guerra
Keyword(s):  
Unit Ball ◽  
Radial Solution ◽  
The Other ◽  
Smooth Domain ◽  
Gradient Term ◽  
Radial Solutions ◽  
Bounded Smooth Domain ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Bounded Smooth ◽  
Semilinear Problem

<p style='text-indent:20px;'>We consider the following semilinear problem with a gradient term in the nonlinearity</p><p style='text-indent:20px;'><disp-formula> <label/> <tex-math id="FE1"> \begin{document}$ \begin{align*} -\Delta u = \lambda \frac{(1+|\nabla u|^q)}{(1-u)^p}\quad\text{in}\quad\Omega,\quad u&gt;0\quad \text{in}\quad \Omega, \quad u = 0\quad\text{on}\quad \partial \Omega. \end{align*} $\end{document} </tex-math></disp-formula></p><p style='text-indent:20px;'>where <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ \lambda,p,q&gt;0 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ \Omega $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> be a bounded, smooth domain in <inline-formula><tex-math id="M3">\begin{document}$ {\mathbb R}^N $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>. We prove that when <inline-formula><tex-math id="M4">\begin{document}$ \Omega $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> is a unit ball and <inline-formula><tex-math id="M5">\begin{document}$ p = 1 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><tex-math id="M6">\begin{document}$ q\in (0,q^*(N)) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><tex-math id="M7">\begin{document}$ q^*(N)\in (1,2) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>, we have infinitely many radial solutions for <inline-formula><tex-math id="M8">\begin{document}$ 2\leq N&lt;2\frac{6-q+2\sqrt{8-2q}}{(2-q)^2}+1 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="M9">\begin{document}$ \lambda = \tilde \lambda $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>. On the other hand, for <inline-formula><tex-math id="M10">\begin{document}$ N&gt;2\frac{6-q+2\sqrt{8-2q}}{(2-q)^2}+1 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> there exists a unique radial solution for <inline-formula><tex-math id="M11">\begin{document}$ 0&lt;\lambda&lt;\tilde \lambda $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula>.</p>

Further study of a fourth-order elliptic equation with negative exponent

2011 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongming Guo ◽  
Zhongyuan Liu
Keyword(s):  
Fourth Order ◽  
Blow Up ◽  
Smooth Domain ◽  
Regular Solutions ◽  
Order Problem ◽  
Bounded Smooth Domain ◽  
Main Technique ◽  
Fourth Order Elliptic Equation ◽  
Fourth Order Problem ◽  
Bounded Smooth

We continue to study the nonlinear fourth-order problem TΔu – DΔ2u = λ/(L + u)2, –L < u < 0 in Ω, u = 0, Δu = 0 on ∂Ω, where Ω ⊂ ℝN is a bounded smooth domain and λ > 0 is a parameter. When N = 2 and Ω is a convex domain, we know that there is λc > 0 such that for λ ∊ (0, λc) the problem possesses at least two regular solutions. We will see that the convexity assumption on Ω can be removed, i.e. the main results are still true for a general bounded smooth domain Ω. The main technique in the proofs of this paper is the blow-up argument, and the main difficulty is the analysis of touch-down behaviour.

Optimal global asymptotic behaviour of the solution to a class of singular Dirichlet problems

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Zhijun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Asymptotic Behaviour ◽  
Unique Solution ◽  
Blow Up ◽  
Critical Values ◽  
Smooth Domain ◽  
Dirichlet Problems ◽  
Bounded Smooth Domain ◽  
Bounded Smooth

This paper is mainly concerned with the global asymptotic behaviour of the unique solution to a class of singular Dirichlet problems − Δu = b(x)g(u), u > 0, x ∈ Ω, u|∂Ω = 0, where Ω is a bounded smooth domain in ℝ n , g ∈ C1(0, ∞) is positive and decreasing in (0, ∞) with $\lim _{s\rightarrow 0^+}g(s)=\infty$ , b ∈ Cα(Ω) for some α ∈ (0, 1), which is positive in Ω, but may vanish or blow up on the boundary properly. Moreover, we reveal the asymptotic behaviour of such a solution when the parameters on b tend to the corresponding critical values.

HARDY-SOBOLEV INEQUALITY IN H1(Ω) AND ITS APPLICATIONS

2002 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 409-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
ADIMURTHI
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Condition ◽  
Sobolev Inequality ◽  
Neumann Boundary Condition ◽  
Remainder Term ◽  
Blow Up ◽  
Neumann Boundary ◽  
Smooth Domain ◽  
Bounded Smooth Domain ◽  
Eigen Value ◽  
Bounded Smooth

In this article, we have determined the remainder term for Hardy–Sobolev inequality in H1(Ω) for Ω a bounded smooth domain and studied the existence, non existence and blow up of first eigen value and eigen function for the corresponding Hardy–Sobolev operator with Neumann boundary condition.

scholarly journals Existence and Asymptotic Profile of Nodal Solutions to Supercritical Problems

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mónica Clapp ◽  
Filomena Pacella
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Domain ◽  
Nodal Solutions ◽  
Bounded Smooth Domain ◽  
Asymptotic Profile ◽  
Bounded Smooth ◽  
Supercritical Problem

AbstractWe establish the existence of nodal solutions to the supercritical problemin a symmetric bounded smooth domain Ω of

Reply to Discussion by J. R. Hearst and R. C. Carlson

Geophysics ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 44 (8) ◽  
pp. 1464-1464
Author(s):  
J. R. Hearst ◽  
R. C. Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Outer Radius ◽  
The Other ◽  
Gradient Term ◽  
The Earth ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Free Air ◽  
Inner Radius ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference

Our equations (3) and (4) are correct. They represent the difference between the attraction of the shell viewed from [Formula: see text], the outer radius of the shell, and [Formula: see text], its inner radius. (The attraction of the shell viewed from [Formula: see text] is zero.) On the other hand, equations (5) and (6) of Fahlquist and Carlson represent the difference in attraction of the entire earth from the same viewpoints and thus, as they say, include a free‐air gradient term. However, their equation (5) would be correct only if the mean density of the earth were equal to that of the shell, and the free‐air gradient obtained by their equation (10) is correct only under these circumstances.

Structure of positive boundary blow-up solutions

2004 ◽  
Vol 134 (5) ◽  
pp. 923-938 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongming Guo
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Blow Up ◽  
Smooth Domain ◽  
Bounded Smooth Domain ◽  
Semilinear Problems ◽  
Bounded Smooth ◽  
Positive Boundary

The structure of positive boundary blow-up solutions to semilinear problems of the form −Δu = λf(u) in Ω, u = ∞ on ∂Ω, Ω ⊂ RN a bounded smooth domain, is studied for a class of nonlinearities f ∈ C1 ([0, ∞)\{z2}) satisfying f (0) = f(z1) = f (z2) = 0 with 0 < z1 < z2, f < 0 in (0, z1)∪(z2, ∞), f > 0 in (z1, z2). Two positive boundary-layer solutions and infinitely many positive spike-layer solutions are obtained for λ sufficiently large.

scholarly journals Existence of Solutions for a Modified Nonlinear Schrödinger System

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Yujuan Jiao ◽  
Yanli Wang
Keyword(s):  
Perturbation Method ◽  
Existence Of Solutions ◽  
Critical Sobolev Exponent ◽  
Smooth Domain ◽  
Bounded Smooth Domain ◽  
Nonlinear Schrödinger ◽  
Nonlinear Schrödinger System ◽  
Bounded Smooth ◽  
Sobolev Exponent ◽  
Schrödinger System

We are concerned with the following modified nonlinear Schrödinger system:-Δu+u-(1/2)uΔ(u2)=(2α/(α+β))|u|α-2|v|βu,  x∈Ω,  -Δv+v-(1/2)vΔ(v2)=(2β/(α+β))|u|α|v|β-2v,  x∈Ω,  u=0,  v=0,  x∈∂Ω, whereα>2,  β>2,  α+β<2·2*,  2*=2N/(N-2)is the critical Sobolev exponent, andΩ⊂ℝN  (N≥3)is a bounded smooth domain. By using the perturbation method, we establish the existence of both positive and negative solutions for this system.

Positive and nodal solutions for an elliptic equation with critical growth

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (02) ◽  
pp. 1550021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo F. Furtado ◽  
Bruno N. Souza
Keyword(s):  
Elliptic Equation ◽  
Positive Solution ◽  
Critical Growth ◽  
Smooth Domain ◽  
Nodal Solution ◽  
Nodal Solutions ◽  
Bounded Smooth Domain ◽  
Continuous Potential ◽  
Bounded Smooth

We consider the problem [Formula: see text] where [Formula: see text] is a bounded smooth domain, [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]. Under some suitable conditions on the continuous potential [Formula: see text] and on the parameter [Formula: see text], we obtain one nodal solution for [Formula: see text] and one positive solution for [Formula: see text].

scholarly journals Sign-changing solutions for a Schrödinger–Kirchhoff–Poisson system with 4-sublinear growth nonlinearity

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Shubin Yu ◽  
Ziheng Zhang ◽  
Rong Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Type System ◽  
Invariant Sets ◽  
Smooth Domain ◽  
Positive Parameter ◽  
Poisson System ◽  
Bounded Smooth Domain ◽  
Existence And Multiplicity ◽  
Bounded Smooth ◽  
Sign Changing Solutions ◽  
Poisson Type

In this paper we consider the following Schrödinger–Kirchhoff–Poisson-type system { − ( a + b ∫ Ω | ∇ u | 2 d x ) Δ u + λ ϕ u = Q ( x ) | u | p − 2 u in   Ω , − Δ ϕ = u 2 in   Ω , u = ϕ = 0 on   ∂ Ω , where Ω is a bounded smooth domain of R 3 , a > 0 , b ≥ 0 are constants and λ is a positive parameter. Under suitable conditions on Q ( x ) and combining the method of invariant sets of descending flow, we establish the existence and multiplicity of sign-changing solutions to this problem for the case that 2 < p < 4 as λ sufficient small. Furthermore, for λ = 1 and the above assumptions on Q ( x ) , we obtain the same conclusions with 2 < p < 12 5 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document