scholarly journals Older adults, frailty, and the social and behavioral determinants of health

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 5-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Monsen ◽  
Sasank Maganti ◽  
Grace Gao
Author(s):  
Taeho Greg Rhee ◽  
Kathy Lee ◽  
Jean J Schensul

Abstract Background To characterize cumulative risk scores of social and behavioral determinants of health (SDoH) and examine their association with self-rated general health and functional limitations between non-Hispanic black and white older adults in the United States. Method We used data from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), with a nationally representative sample of black and white adults aged 65 or older (n = 954 unweighted). We quantified the cumulative risk scores of SDoH (eg, food insecurity, education and poverty), ranging from 0 (no risk at all) to 8 (highest risk), and used multivariable-adjusted logistic and Poisson regression analyses to assess the association of SDoH by racial group with self-rated health and functional limitations, adjusting for other covariates. Results Black older adults had a higher mean cumulative risk score than white counterparts (2.3 ± 2.1 vs 1.5 ± 1.0; p < .001). Black older adults were more likely to report lower self-rated health than white older adults in each of SDoH domains (p < .01 for each). In multivariable-adjusted analyses, black older adults were more likely to report lower self-rated health than white older adults (p < .01 for all) regardless of SDoH risk factors. However, those with high SDoH risk factors (ie, ≥3 risk factors) were more likely to report functional limitations than those in the low-risk group (ie, <3 risk factors) in both racial groups (p < .01 for all). Conclusion SDoH-related black–white disparities remain persistent in older age. In particular, SDoH index scores for black and white older adults were differentially associated with functional limitations. Addressing SDoH should be an important consideration in reducing gaps in black–white disparities of functioning.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Garnett ◽  
Melissa Northwood ◽  
Justine Ting ◽  
Ruheena Sangrar

BACKGROUND Caregivers provide crucial support to older adults so they can remain safely in their homes as they age. Over time, caregivers’ own health can be negatively impacted by their caregiving role. The social determinants of health, such as gender and socioeconomic status, can influence assuming a caregiving role as well as the impacts of caregiving on the caregiver. While programs exist to support caregivers, uptake of these services does not match the need for services expressed by caregivers. Research suggests that supportive interventions offered via mobile health technologies have the potential to increase caregiver accessibility of supportive services. However, a knowledge gap exists regarding the extent to which the social determinants of health are considered in the design, implementation, and evaluation of mobile health (mHealth) interventions intended to support caregivers of older adults. Furthermore, a comprehensive review of the impact of mHealth interventions in this population does not exist. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review to: (1) determine how health inequities are considered in the design, implementation, and evaluation of mHealth interventions for caregivers of older adults using Cochrane-Equity's PROGRESS-Plus framework; and (2) synthesize evidence of the impacts of caregiver-focused mHealth interventions. METHODS A systematic review was conducted in five databases and articles published between January 2010 and June 2021 were included if they evaluated or explored the impacts of mHealth interventions on the health and wellbeing of informal caregivers of older adults. mHealth interventions were defined as those that caregivers of older adults accessed via mobile or wireless devices. RESULTS A total of 28 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. The interventions evaluated by the included studies sought to help caregivers make connections with services, facilitate the caregiving process, and promote the caregivers’ health and wellbeing. The PROGRESS-Plus framework factors were mainly considered in the results, discussion, and limitations sections of included studies. Some PROGRESS-Plus factors such as sexual orientation, religion and occupation, received little to no consideration in all phases of intervention design, implementation, or evaluation. Overall, findings of this review suggest that mHealth interventions were positively received by users. Such interventions may have the potential to reduce caregiver burden and positively impact caregivers’ physical and mental health while supporting them in their caregiving role. Study findings highlight the importance of available supports to help facilitate caregivers’ use of mHealth interventions particularly early on as well as the use of appropriate language and text. CONCLUSIONS Successful uptake and spread of mHealth interventions to support caregivers of older adults will depend on creating opportunities for inclusive involvement of a broad range of stakeholders at all stages of design, implementation, and assessment. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO CRD42021239584; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=239584


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 537-544
Author(s):  
Lorraine R. Barton ◽  
Kathryn A. Parke ◽  
Carole L. White

2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Northwood ◽  
Jenny Ploeg ◽  
Maureen Markle-Reid ◽  
Diana Sherifali

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 357-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saty Satya-Murti ◽  
Jennifer Gutierrez

The Los Angeles Plaza Community Center (PCC), an early twentieth-century Los Angeles community center and clinic, published El Mexicano, a quarterly newsletter, from 1913 to 1925. The newsletter’s reports reveal how the PCC combined walk-in medical visits with broader efforts to address the overall wellness of its attendees. Available records, some with occasional clinical details, reveal the general spectrum of illnesses treated over a twelve-year span. Placed in today’s context, the medical care given at this center was simple and minimal. The social support it provided, however, was multifaceted. The center’s caring extended beyond providing medical attention to helping with education, nutrition, employment, transportation, and moral support. Thus, the social determinants of health (SDH), a prominent concern of present-day public health, was a concept already realized and practiced by these early twentieth-century Los Angeles Plaza community leaders. Such practices, although not yet nominally identified as SDH, had their beginnings in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century social activism movement aiming to mitigate the social ills and inequities of emerging industrial nations. The PCC was one of the pioneers in this effort. Its concerns and successes in this area were sophisticated enough to be comparable to our current intentions and aspirations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document