Risk associated with the intake of aflatoxin M1 from milk in Iran

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 191-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Fooladi Moghaddam ◽  
M. Rychlik ◽  
H. Hosseini ◽  
B. Janat ◽  
H. Yazdanpanah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Maximum Level ◽  
Iranian Population ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
International Agency ◽  
Management Processes ◽  
Heat Treated ◽  
Current Maximum ◽  
Local Exposure ◽  
Aflatoxin B

Aflatoxin M1 is an oxidative metabolite of aflatoxin B1 formed in liver and excreted into milk, urine and faeces of dairy cattle and other mammalian species. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classified aflatoxin M1 in Group 2B because of its potential to get bioactivated to a mutagen analogous to aflatoxin B1. Risk assessments are undertaken to guide food regulators and scientists in risk management processes, such as the legislative levels or guideline targets for mycotoxins in food supplies. Using existing international resources for hazard data and local exposure data, and based on cancer potency as the endpoint, the risk of exposure to aflatoxin M1 in milk for the Iranian population was calculated considering various scenarios. During 2014-2015, 518 samples were collected from the market and tested for aflatoxin M1 contamination by HPLC-FLD. The most probable scenarios calculated as mean occurrence multiplied by the mean consumption in consumers of milk, and for maximum level allowed for aflatoxin M1 in milk with 99 percentiles of milk consumption showed the risk of 0.08 and 0.72 additional liver cancer cases per year for the Iranian population, respectively. Thus, our study reveals a low risk and that the current maximum limit of 100 ng/l for aflatoxin M1 in milk, heat treated milk and flavoured milk is sustainable.

Aflatoxin B1 contamination of feedstuff on a dairy farm in Northern Peru and aflatoxin M1 concentrations in raw milk

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
I. Salazar ◽  
I. López ◽  
P. Glorio-Paulet ◽  
C. Gomez
Keyword(s):  
Soybean Meal ◽  
Dairy Farm ◽  
Maximum Level ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Aflatoxin Contamination ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Northern Peru ◽  
Contamination Levels ◽  
Aflatoxin B

Research regarding aflatoxin contamination levels in Peru is limited, although aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) require surveillance because of their toxicity. European regulations state that the harmonised maximum level (ML) is 5 μg/kg for AFB1 in feedstuffs and 0.05 μg/kg for AFM1 in milk. Our study aimed to determine the annual variation levels of AFB1 in ingredients used in feedstuffs for dairy cows and those of AFM1 in milk at a typical intensive dairy farm in Northern Peru. For 1 year, milk (n=529) and feedstuff samples (n=235) were collected and aflatoxin levels were determined using a lateral flow immunoassay. We found that 16% of milk samples had AFM1 contamination above the ML. AFM1 level was significantly higher (P<0.05) in December (end of spring) than that in all other months. Throughout the year, the most used feedstuffs were maize, soybean meal and whole soybean. Among the maize samples (n=77), 2.59% had an AFB1 level above the ML, whereas 45% had an AFB1 level below the ML. On the other hand, neither the soybean meal (n=69) nor whole soybean samples (n=64) had an AFB1 level above the ML, 46.4 and 20%, respectively. In 50% (n=10) of cottonseed meal samples, AFB1 level was above the ML; in 20% of wheat middling samples, it was above the ML. Cottonseed and wheat middling samples were used for 2 and 5 months, respectively. AFB1 level in feedstuff showed a significant difference in December (P<0.05) compared with other months, specifically for maize and soybean meal. As the AFM1 level in milk results from AFB1 contaminated feedstuff, our results emphasise the need to implement specific quality measures to reduce contamination.

scholarly journals Determination of aflatoxin M1 and deoxynivalenol biomarkers in infants and children urines from Bangladesh

2020 ◽  
Vol 94 (11) ◽  
pp. 3775-3786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurshad Ali ◽  
M. Manirujjaman ◽  
Sohel Rana ◽  
Gisela H. Degen
Keyword(s):  
Young Children ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Infants And Children ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Detection Frequency ◽  
Current Maximum ◽  
Food Commodities ◽  
Aflatoxin B ◽  
In Infants And Children

Abstract The mycotoxins aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and deoxynivalenol (DON) are found worldwide in crops and dietary staples. The prevalence and levels of these contaminants can vary greatly, and data in Bangladeshi food commodities are scarce. To characterize human exposure, we have conducted biomonitoring, analyzing AFM1 (a metabolite of AFB1) and DON levels in urines of adult cohorts in Bangladesh. Yet, AFM1 and DON occurrence has not been studied in the very young population of this country. Thus, the same methods, HPLC-FD for AFM1 and LC–MS/MS for DON analysis, were now applied to determine these biomarkers in urines of infants (n = 49) and young children (n = 105) in Rajshahi and Dhaka district. Overall, AFM1 and DON detection frequency was 43.5% and 33.4%, with 34.7% and 11.5% in infant and 47.6% and 39.4% in children urines, respectively. The mean AFM1 levels in all infants (9.1 ± 14.3, max 55.6 pg/mL) and children (8.8 ± 12.9, max 75.3 pg/mL) were not significantly different. The AFM1 mean level was slightly higher in Dhaka (9.4 ± 12.4) compared to Rajshahi (8.5 ± 13.9 pg/mL) district. The average DON level was about 2-fold higher in infant (3.8 ± 2.9, max 6.8 ng/mL) than children urines (1.6 ± 1.8, max 8.6 ng/mL), and higher in Rajshahi (2.1 ± 2.3 ng/mL) than Dhaka (1.4 ± 1.6 ng/mL) district. The biomarker-based estimated average daily DON intake (29.6 ± 108.3 ng/kg bw in infants and 36.4 ± 81.8 ng/kg bw in children) or the maximum exposure (560 ng/kg bw) do not exceed the current maximum provisional tolerable daily intake value of 1 µg/kg bw for DON, although DON exposure in infants and children is higher than that of Bangladeshi adults. The AFM1 urine levels in young children are somewhat lower than those found previously in adult cohorts in Bangladesh, but the frequent detection of this biomarker for AFB1 exposure raises further concerns, also for this vulnerable part of the population. Therefore, continuous surveillance for aflatoxins in Bangladeshi food commodities is clearly required, first to identify major sources of intake and then to reduce exposure.

Determination of mean daily intakes of aflatoxin B1, aflatoxin M1, ochratoxin A, trichothecenes and fumonisins in 24-hour diets of children in the Netherlands

2009 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 451-459 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Bakker ◽  
E. Sizoo ◽  
A. Jekel ◽  
D.P. Pereboom-de Fauw ◽  
R. Schothorst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The Netherlands ◽  
Ochratoxin A ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Limit Of Quantification ◽  
Diet Study ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Daily Intakes ◽  
Aflatoxin B

In 2006, a duplicate diet study of children's food was carried out in the Netherlands. Parents or guardians of 123 children collected duplicates of the 24-hour diets. Levels of aflatoxin M1, aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, trichothecenes and fumonisins were determined. Aflatoxin M1 was detectable in 10% of the samples, with all toxin levels below the limit of quantification. Aflatoxin B1 could be detected in 80% of the samples, while in 47% of all samples aflatoxin B1 was quantifiable. Ochratoxin A could be quantified in all samples. Deoxynivalenol was quantified in almost every sample, while T-2 and HT-2 toxins could only be quantified in 3.2% and 6.4% of the samples respectively. 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol was detected in 1.6% of the samples. Fumonisin B1 was detected in 28% of the samples and fumonisin B2 in a quarter of merely those samples where fumonisin B1 was detected. In 20% of the samples fumonisin B1 could be quantified and in a quarter of those samples fumonisin B2 could be quantified too. The analytical results were used to estimate levels of daily intake. Only the mean daily intake levels for aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, deoxynivalenol and fumonisins B1 and B2 could reliably be estimated. The values were 0.1, 4.1, 291 and 28 ng/kg bw/day respectively, all are well below the corresponding tolerable daily intakes. For aflatoxin B1 a tolerable intake does not exist, but the intake value for this mycotoxin was very low if compared to the value that would result from the intake of food, if it was contaminated with aflatoxin B1 at the EU regulatory limit, specified for baby food. The mean daily intakes of the mycotoxins determined in children's food in the Netherlands are low and implicate that there is no health risk for children due to exposure from the studied mycotoxins.

Ammoniation of Whole Cottonseed at Atmospheric Pressure and Ambient Temperature to Reduce Aflatoxin M1 in Milk1

1982 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. L. PRICE ◽  
O. G. LOUGH ◽  
W. H. BROWN
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Cattle ◽  
Atmospheric Pressure ◽  
Background Level ◽  
Maximum Level ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Treatment Conditions ◽  
Bulk Tank ◽  
Whole Cottonseed ◽  
Lactating Dairy Cattle

Aflatoxin-contaminated cottonseed was treated with 1 1/2% ammonia and 10% water and packed into a 3 m in diameter by 30-m long polyethylene bag and held for 21 d. The ammoniated cottonseed was fed to lactating dairy cattle in two different trials. (a) Ammoniated cottonseed was added to a standard dairy ration for 90 cows at a level of 3.5 kg per cow per day for 19 d. Non-ammoniated cottonseed was then fed at the same level for 7 d. Daily analysis of the milk from the bulk tank was performed. No differences in aflatoxin M1 from the background level of 0.1 μg/L was noted until the 22nd day of feeding. The maximum aflatoxin M1 level was reached at 0.55 μg/L on days 25–27. Levels returned to 0.1 μg/L 4 d after resumption of the feeding of the standard dairy ration. (b) Two and two tenths kg per day of ammoniated or non-ammoniated seed were added to rations of each of 6 dairy cows for 7 d. Milk samples were taken two milkings before feeding of the cottonseed, at each milking during the feeding and for 7 d after cottonseed feeding ceased. Analysis of milk for aflatoxin M1 showed a maximum level of 1.8 μg/L from the group receiving the untreated cottonseed and a maximum of 0.18 from the group receiving the ammoniated meal. Milk from both groups was negative for aflatoxin M1 6 d after cottonseed feeding ceased. Ammoniation of whole cottonseed included in the ration of dairy cattle was effective in reducing the amount of aflatoxin M1 in their milk by approximately 90% but not in completely eliminating it at treatment conditions used.

scholarly journals Urinary excretion of aflatoxin M1 after administration of aflatoxin B1 in sucrose- or starch-rich diets

1978 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Wise ◽  
M. Suzangar ◽  
M. Messripour ◽  
J. Mohammadi
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Excretion ◽  
Aflatoxin B1 ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Sprague Dawley ◽  
Drug Metabolizing Enzyme ◽  
Sprague Dawley Rats ◽  
Metabolizing Enzyme ◽  
Aflatoxin B

1. Male Sprague–Dawley rats were given 630 g/kg sucrose or starch with 2 mg/kg aflatoxin B1 for periods of 75, 145 and 200 d, and the 24 h urinary excretion of aflatoxin M1 was measured.2. Less aflatoxin M1 was excreted by the rats fed on the sucrose-rich diet compared to those fed on the starch-rich diet. This difference was especially marked when expressed per g metabolizing tissue.3. It is concluded that sucrose probably decreases the activity of aflatoxin B1 metabolism in a similar way to its previously found effect on the drug-metabolizing enzyme.

Individual reaction requirements of two enzyme activities, isolated from Aspergillus parasiticus, which together catalyze conversion of sterigmatocystin to aflatoxin B1

1987 ◽  
Vol 33 (12) ◽  
pp. 1108-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas E. Cleveland ◽  
Deepak Bhatnagar
Keyword(s):  
Aflatoxin B1 ◽  
Enzyme Activities ◽  
Microsomal Fraction ◽  
Aspergillus Parasiticus ◽  
Heat Treated ◽  
Individual Reaction ◽  
Aflatoxin B

Individual reaction requirements were determined for each of two enzyme activities present in Aspergillus parasiticus mycelia which together catalyze conversion of sterigmatocystin (ST) to aflatoxin B1 (AFB1). A postmicrosomal activity (PMA) catalyzed conversion of ST to O-methylsterigmatocystin (OMST) and a microsomal activity (MA) catalyzed conversion of OMST to AFB1. PMA was stimulated two- to three-fold in the presence of S-adenosylmethionine. Addition of NADPH promoted the maximum MA; this activity was not detected when FAD, FMN, NAD, or NADH were utilized individually as cofactors in reaction mixtures. A substantial amount (62%) of MA was lost during isolation of the microsomal fraction, but the activity was completely restored by reconstitution with a heat-treated (100 °C) postmicrosomal fraction. The reaction catalyzed by MA was optimum at pH 7.0 and at 17–23 °C, whereas the PMA reaction was optimum at pH 8.0–8.5 and at 35–40 °C. Apparent Km values of approximately 2.6 × 10−6 M (for ST) and 6.6 × 10−7 M (for OMST) were determined for PMA and MA, respectively.

Reliability of Mycotoxin Assays — An Update

1993 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-491 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Horwitz ◽  
Richard Albert ◽  
Stanley Nesheim
Keyword(s):  
Aflatoxin B1 ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Effective Control ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
International Agency ◽  
Single Digit ◽  
Method Performance ◽  
A Value ◽  
Relative Standard

Abstract The precision parameters of the method-performance (collaborative) studies for mycotoxins published in the literature through 1991 have been recalculated on a uniform basis by following the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry protocol. About 80% of the 793 accepted assays for mycotoxins, almost all of which have been conducted by thin-layer chromatography (TLC), liquid chromatography (LC), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), exhibit relative standard deviations among laboratories (RSDR) that are less than 2 times the values predicted from the Horwitz equation: RSDR,% = 2(1 - 0.5log10C) where C is the concentration expressed as a decimal fraction. The precision of TLC and LC methods is about the same, but that of ELISA is somewhat poorer. For those commodities for which sufficient data exist to provide a meaningful comparison, the methods applied to cottonseed products have the best precision and corn the worst, with peanuts intermediate. Overall, however, the primary factor affecting RSDR is concentration, more or less independent of analyte, method, matrix, and age of the study. If it is assumed that the test results are normally distributed and that an RSDR of 50% is the point where effective control of the results begins to be lost (a value equivalent to the production of 2% false-negative values), then relying on the Horwitz curve, the limit of quantitative measurement is the single digit, i.e., 5,µg/kg (10-9; ppb) concentration for solid food commodities. Such a value must be considered as a limit applicable to a single analyte, aflatoxin B1, and not as a mean, and not applicable to the sum of the individual components, each of whose associated standard deviation would lie in the unacceptable region. Enforcement of a 5 µg aflatoxin B1/kg limit, under the assumptions made, requires that a responsible manufacturer and a prudent regulator operate at opposite extremes of tolerance limits: e.g., the producer at 2 µg/kg and the consumer at 10. A proposed Codex “maximum level” of 0.05 µg aflatoxin M1/kg milk cannot be supported by the available data applied in an interlaboratory enforcement environment. These conclusions are also supported by an examination of the reported data from the ongoing, large-scale proficiency studies routinely performed by the American Oil Chemists’ Society and the International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Collaborative Study of the Stability of Aflatoxin M1 Standards

1973 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 1115-1118
Author(s):  
Iain F H Purchase ◽  
Brian Altenkirk
Keyword(s):  
Thin Layer ◽  
Silica Gel ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Ultraviolet Absorption ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Absorption Spectrophotometry ◽  
International Collaborative ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Aflatoxin B ◽  
International Collaborative Study

Abstract Nine laboratories took part in an international collaborative study of the stability of aflatoxin M1 standards. The study confirmed the suitability of ultraviolet absorption spectrophotometry, as described for standardization of aflatoxin B and G solutions, for standardization of aflatoxin M1 solutions. Standards of aflatoxin M1 dissolved in chloroform were superior to those dissolved in benzene-acetonitrile (98 + 2), and no measurable decrease in concentration was observed after 4 months of storage at −10°C. The intensity of fluorescence of aflatoxins B1 and M1 after separation on silica gel thin layer plates was found to be nearly the same when measured visually or by densitometry.

Aflatoxin M1 contamination level in Iranian milk and dairy products: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hamzeh Pour ◽  
S. Mahmoudi ◽  
S. Masoumi ◽  
S. Rezaie ◽  
A. Barac ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dairy Products ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Raw Milk ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Contamination Level ◽  
Livestock Feeds ◽  
Aflatoxin B ◽  
Mean Concentration ◽  
Milk And Dairy Products

Aflatoxin M1 is a derivate of aflatoxin B1 and an important contaminant of milk and dairy products. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on relevant Persian and English original articles in national and international databases with no time limits until 1 January 2018. In total 605 articles were found among which 70 articles met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The prevalence (95% confidence interval (CI)) and mean concentration (95% CI) of aflatoxin M1 was found to be 64% (53-75%) and 39.7 ng/l (31.9-47.4 ng/l) in raw milk, 95% (89-98%) and 62.3 ng/l (40.6-84 ng/l) in pasteurised milk, 71% (56-84%) and 60.1 ng/l (30.9-89.3 ng/l) in sterilised milk, 59% (20-93%) and 5.5 ng/l (3.3-7.7 ng/l) in breast milk and 72% (61-81%) and 82.3 ng/kg (63.7-100.9 ng/kg) in dairy products. In general, 9% (4-16%) of milks and 10% (4-17%) of dairy products had aflatoxin M1 in concentrations exceeding the permitted level of Iranian standards (500 ng/l). Based on the maximum permitted aflatoxin M1 concentration in standards of Europe (50 ng/l), these percentages increase to 25% (18-32%) for milks and 18% (9-29%) for dairy products. According to the results, further control and preventive measures should be applied on livestock feeds because decreased aflatoxin B1 contamination at this level results in decreased aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products.

scholarly journals Opposite Direction for Seasonal Variation of Aflatoxin M1 in Bulk Milk and Aflatoxin B1 in Rations: Results From a Prospective Study in Selected Dairy Farms of Qazvin Province, Iran

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravel Gholampour-Aghdami ◽  
Mehdi Mohebbi-Fani ◽  
Arash Omidi ◽  
Aria Rasooli ◽  
Maryam Maryam Ansari-Lari
Keyword(s):  
Great Majority ◽  
Aflatoxin M1 ◽  
Feed Ingredients ◽  
Milk Samples ◽  
Bulk Milk ◽  
Beet Pulp ◽  
Aflatoxin B ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Controlling Measures ◽  
Standard Limit

Abstract The presence of aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in 24h bulk milk and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) in concurrent total mixed rations (TMR) and feed ingredients were assessed in 12 large dairy operations. The bulk milk was sampled on days 1, 15 and 30 during winter and summer (n=72). Total mixed rations (n=48) and feed ingredients (n=230) were sampled two times with a 30-day interval. Aflatoxin was measured using direct competitive ELISA kits with detection limits of 1-81 ngkg−1 for milk and 1.25-101.25 ngkg−1 for feeds. Aflatoxin M1 was identified in all milk samples (100%), ranging from 2.03 to >81 ngkg−1, with a median of 70 ngkg−1 and averaging 61.25±28.91 ngkg−1 in winter and 54.20±25.51 ngkg−1 in summer (P=0.279). Contaminations <81 ngkg−1 (below the Iranian standard of 100 ngkg-1) were detected in 76% (n=55/72) of samples. Contaminations >81 ngkg−1 were detected in 24% (n=17/72) of samples and were more frequent in winter than in summer (42% vs. 6%). Sixty-nine percent of the winter milk samples (n=25/36) had contaminations above the median (70 ngkg−1). A reverse result was detected in summer. The chance of contaminations above median was higher in winter than in summer (OR=5.33, P=0.007). All TMR and ingredient samples had higher AFB1 contaminations in summer (P<0.05). Six TMR samples had non-detectable (<1.25 ngkg-1) values (5 in winter) and 7 samples had levels >101.25 ngkg-1 (all in summer). The chance of TMR contamination above the median (716 ngkg-1) was 5.57 times higher in summer than in winter (P=0.002). Seventy percent of the TMR samples had contaminations above the median in summer. Elevated levels of AFB1 of rations in summer (1375.50±905.02 vs. 537.05±558.79; P<0.002) did not result in elevation of AFM1 in milk, probably due to reduced AFB1 metabolism in the liver and lower dry matter intakes caused by heat stress. The AFB1 content of grain mix succeeded by corn silage, wet beet pulp, dry beet pulp and alfalfa hay were correlated with TMR contamination. Ration AFB1 and milk AFM1 were not correlated. Based on the results, a great majority of milk produced in the studied farms could have AFM1 contaminations below the Iranian standard limit (100 ngkg-1). Contaminations below 50 ngkg-1 appear to be achievable and affordable. Intensifying the controlling measures in summer, when the feed contaminations are elevated, may reduce the overall milk contamination.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document