Safety and tolerance of three probiotic strains in healthy infants: a multi-centre randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-578 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Manzano ◽  
J. De Andrés ◽  
I. Castro ◽  
J.M. Rodríguez ◽  
E. Jiménez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bifidobacterium Longum ◽  
Lactobacillus Helveticus ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Healthy Infants ◽  
Probiotic Strains

Some strains of species belonging to the genera Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are used in order to maintain health. Although these organisms have a long record of safe use, it is important to assess their safety and tolerance in potentially vulnerable populations, such as infants. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and tolerance of three probiotic strains (Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 and Lactobacillus helveticus R0052) in healthy infants aged 3 to 12 months. A multi-centre randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled intervention study with 221 healthy full-term infants was conducted. Infants received either a placebo or one of the 3 probiotic strains (3×109 cfu) daily during an 8 week intervention period. Growth (weight, height and head circumference), adverse events (AEs)/serious adverse events (SAEs), concentrations of D-lactic acid in urine samples, characteristics of the stools and use of medication were collected for safety evaluation. All 4 groups were homogeneous with respect to age, gender, feeding type, ethnicity, height, weight and head circumference at the start of the study. The results showed that changes in growth (weight, height and head circumference) were equivalent in all 4 groups. No SAEs were reported. Total number of AEs recorded was equivalent in all groups. Thus, the use of B. infantis R0033, L. helveticus R0052 and B. bifidum R0071 in infancy is safe, and well tolerated.

Safety and efficacy of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Endoscopy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 949-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eui Kim ◽  
Min Um ◽  
Kyoung Kim ◽  
Jung Kim ◽  
Su Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Research Information ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Submucosal Dissection

Abstract Background and study aims Anticholinergic premedication has not been validated for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for ESD. Methods A total of 196 patients undergoing ESD at a single tertiary medical center between December 2014 and February 2016 were randomly allocated to receive one of the following two premedications: glycopyrrolate (0.004 mg/kg intramuscularly [IM]) or placebo (2.0 mL normal saline solution IM). All patients received the premedication 30 minutes prior to ESD in a double-blind manner. The endoscopists reported the ease of performing the procedure and the incidence of secretion-induced hypoxemia, cough, and other procedure-related adverse events. Results Glycopyrrolate and placebo were received by 96 and 100 patients, respectively. ESD was successfully performed in all patients without any serious adverse events related to sedation or ESD. The median visual analog scale for procedure ease was higher in the glycopyrrolate group at 8 (interquartile range [IQR] 7 – 9) vs. 7 (IQR 6 – 8.25); P < 0.001. The proportions of patients with secretion-induced hypoxemia (4.4 % vs. 14.3 %; P = 0.03) and cough (16.7 % vs. 35.7 %; P = 0.005) were lower in the glycopyrrolate group.  Conclusions The use of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for ESD significantly improved the ease of performing the procedure and reduced the incidence of secretion-induced hypoxemia and cough during ESD. Glycopyrrolate may be a promising premedication to ensure safe and stable ESD procedures.Trial registration: Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS): KCT0001540.

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Synbiotic Preparation Containing Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium Probiotic Strains and Short Chain Fructooligosaccharides in Patients with Diarrhea Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome—A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1999
Author(s):  
Barbara Skrzydło-Radomańska ◽  
Beata Prozorow-Król ◽  
Halina Cichoż-Lach ◽  
Emilia Majsiak ◽  
Joanna B. Bierła ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bifidobacterium Longum ◽  
Lactobacillus Rhamnosus ◽  
Bifidobacterium Bifidum ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Bowel Habit ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Global Improvement ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

The purpose of the randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was to assess the effectiveness of synbiotic preparation containing probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus FloraActive™ 19070-2, Lactobacillus acidophilus DSMZ 32418, Bifidobacterium lactis DSMZ 32269, Bifidobacterium longum DSMZ 32946, Bifidobacterium bifidum DSMZ 32403 and fructooligosaccharides in adult patients with diarrhea-dominant IBS (IBS-D). The study included eighty patients with moderate and severe IBS-D who were randomized to receive synbiotics or placebo for eight weeks. Finally, a total of sixty-eight patients finished the study. The primary endpoints included the assessment of the symptoms’ severity with IBS symptom severity scale (IBS-SSS), an improvement of IBS global symptoms with Global Improvement Scale (IBS-GIS) and adequate relief of symptoms after four and eight weeks of therapy. Secondary endpoints, which were collected by telephone interviewers three times a week included the assessment of individual IBS symptoms and adverse events. Synbiotic treatment in comparison to placebo significantly improved IBS-GIS (p = 0.043), and IBS-SSS score inducing a decrease in the total IBS-SSS (p = 0.042) and in domain-specific scores related to flatulence (p = 0.028) and bowel habit (p = 0.028) after four and eight weeks. Patients treated with synbiotics reported in weekly observations a significant amelioration in a feeling of incomplete bowel movements, flatulence, pain, stool pressure and diarrheal stools compared to those receiving placebo. There were no differences in adverse events between both groups. Concluding, the multi-strain synbiotic preparation was associated with a significant improvement in symptoms in IBS-D patients and was well-tolerated. These results suggest that the use of synbiotics offers a benefit for IBS-D patients. [Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04206410 registered 20 December 2019].

scholarly journals Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 results in a greater proportion of healthy days and a lower percentage of academically stressed students reporting a day of cold/flu: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

2015 ◽  
Vol 113 (3) ◽  
pp. 426-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bobbi Langkamp-Henken ◽  
Cassie C. Rowe ◽  
Amanda L. Ford ◽  
Mary C. Christman ◽  
Carmelo Nieves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stress ◽  
Bifidobacterium Longum ◽  
Daily Intake ◽  
Bifidobacterium Bifidum ◽  
Lactobacillus Helveticus ◽  
Lower Percentage ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Symptom Intensity

Acute psychological stress is positively associated with a cold/flu. The present randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the effect of three potentially probiotic bacteria on the proportion of healthy days over a 6-week period in academically stressed undergraduate students (n 581) who received Lactobacillus helveticus R0052, Bifidobacterium longum ssp. infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071 or placebo. On each day, participants recorded the intensity (scale: 0 = not experiencing to 3 = very intense) for nine cold/flu symptoms, and a sum of symptom intensity >6 was designated as a day of cold/flu. B. bifidum resulted in a greater proportion of healthy days than placebo (P≤ 0·05). The percentage of participants reporting ≥ 1 d of cold/flu during the 6-week intervention period was significantly lower with B. bifidum than with placebo (P< 0·05). There were no effects of B. infantis or L. helveticus compared with placebo on either outcome. A predictive model accounted for influential characteristics and their interactions on daily reporting of cold/flu episodes. The proportion of participants reporting a cold on any given day was lower at weeks 2 and 3 with B. bifidum and B. infantis than with placebo for the average level of stress and the most commonly reported number of hours of sleep. Daily intake of bifidobacteria provides benefit related to cold/flu outcomes during acute stress.

scholarly journals Safety, pharmacokinetics and antiviral activity of PGT121, a broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibody against HIV-1: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1 clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn E. Stephenson ◽  
Boris Julg ◽  
C. Sabrina Tan ◽  
Rebecca Zash ◽  
Stephen R. Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Load ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Antiviral Activity ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Hiv 1

AbstractHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1-specific broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies are currently under development to treat and prevent HIV-1 infection. We performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, dose-escalation, placebo-controlled trial of a single administration of the HIV-1 V3-glycan-specific antibody PGT121 at 3, 10 and 30 mg kg–1 in HIV-uninfected adults and HIV-infected adults on antiretroviral therapy (ART), as well as a multicenter, open-label trial of one infusion of PGT121 at 30 mg kg–1 in viremic HIV-infected adults not on ART (no. NCT02960581). The primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and antiviral activity in viremic HIV-infected adults not on ART. The secondary endpoints were changes in anti-PGT121 antibody titers and CD4+ T-cell count, and development of HIV-1 sequence variations associated with PGT121 resistance. Among 48 participants enrolled, no treatment-related serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases or Grade 3 or higher adverse events were reported. The most common reactions among PGT121 recipients were intravenous/injection site tenderness, pain and headache. Absolute and relative CD4+ T-cell counts did not change following PGT121 infusion in HIV-infected participants. Neutralizing anti-drug antibodies were not elicited. PGT121 reduced plasma HIV RNA levels by a median of 1.77 log in viremic participants, with a viral load nadir at a median of 8.5 days. Two individuals with low baseline viral loads experienced ART-free viral suppression for ≥168 days following antibody infusion, and rebound viruses in these individuals demonstrated full or partial PGT121 sensitivity. The trial met the prespecified endpoints. These data suggest that further investigation of the potential of antibody-based therapeutic strategies for long-term suppression of HIV is warranted, including in individuals off ART and with low viral load.

A Controlled Trial of Extended-Release Guanfacine and Psychostimulants on Executive Function and ADHD

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 318-325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judy P. M. van Stralen
Keyword(s):  
Executive Function ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
P Value ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Stimulant Therapy

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of guanfacine extended-release (GXR) versus placebo as adjunct therapy to usual care stimulant therapy in improving executive function in children aged 6 to 12 years diagnosed with ADHD. Method: In this single center, double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial, subjects continued to take their psychostimulant and were randomly assigned at baseline to receive active treatment or placebo first. Efficacy measures included Behavioural Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-P), ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS IV), and Clinical Global Impressions of Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Improvement (CGI-I) scales. Safety measures included adverse events and vital signs. Results: Significant benefits of GXR plus psychostimulant were observed on BRIEF-P ( p value = .0392), ADHD-RS-IV ( p < .0001), CGI-S ( p = .0007), and CGI-I ( p = .003). There were no serious adverse events and no new safety signals. Conclusion: Use of GXR as adjunctive therapy to stimulant therapy significantly improves executive function in children with ADHD.

Efficacy of Phenazone in the Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 888-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
H Göbel ◽  
A Heinze ◽  
U Niederberger ◽  
T Witt ◽  
V Zumbroich
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Acute Migraine ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Main Target

In this study we compared the efficacy of 1000 mg phenazone with that of placebo in the treatment of acute migraine attacks in a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 208 patients. The main target criterion was the number of patients with a pain reduction from severe or moderate to slight or no pain 2 h after taking the pain medication. The percentage of patients satisfying the main target criterion was 48.6% for phenazone and 27.2% ( P < 0.05) for placebo. Freedom from pain after 2 h was reported by 27.6% with phenazone treatment and 13.6% ( P < 0.05) with placebo. Compared with placebo, the phenazone treatment also resulted in a significant improvement in the associated migraine symptoms of nausea, phonophobia and photophobia. Of patients treated with phenazone 11.4%, and 5.8% of those treated with placebo reported adverse events. There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to numbers of patients with adverse events. No serious adverse events occurred. The results show that phenazone at a dosage of 1000 mg is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of acute migraine attacks.

scholarly journals Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Studies to Assess Safety and Prophylactic Efficacy of Naphthoquine-Azithromycin Combination for Malaria Prophylaxis in Southeast Asia

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henglin Yang ◽  
Jingyan Wang ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
Xingliang Li ◽  
Renhua Nie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Southeast Asia ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Protective Efficacy ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Prophylactic Efficacy ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Intention To Treat

ABSTRACTNew prophylactic drugs against malaria infections are urgently needed. We conducted randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trials of a new antimalarial drug combination, naphthoquine-azithromycin (NQAZ), to determine its safety and protective efficacy in a low-endemicity area of Southeast Asia. In the first trial, 127 healthy volunteers were randomized to receive two single doses of either 400 mg of NQAZ (200 mg of each drug), 800 mg of NQAZ (400 mg of each drug), or placebo on day 0 and day 30. Weekly follow-ups were performed for 2 months, and physical and clinical laboratory exams were done during the second and eighth week. Both drug regimens were well tolerated, without any serious adverse events. Four adverse events (transient and slight elevations of serum transaminase concentrations) were found only in the two drug-treated groups and thus might be drug-related. In the second trial, 353 volunteer villagers were randomized into the same three groups as in the first trial, and malaria infections were followed for a month. For the intention-to-treat analysis, both regimens offered greater than 90% prophylactic efficacies against all malaria infections. When the analysis was done according to parasite species, 400 mg and 800 mg NQAZ provided 81.63 and 90.59% prophylactic efficacies, respectively, againstPlasmodium falciparuminfections, whereas both offered 100% prophylactic efficacy againstPlasmodium vivaxandPlasmodium ovale. These trials showed that NQAZ had a good safety profile, and monthly single doses of 400 mg or 800 mg for adults offered excellent prophylaxis against malaria infections, especially the two relapsing species.

A phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lenvatinib (E7080) in patients with 131I-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (SELECT).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA6008-LBA6008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Schlumberger ◽  
Makoto Tahara ◽  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Bruce Robinson ◽  
Marcia S. Brose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

LBA6008 Background: Lenvatinib (LEN) is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of the VEGFR1-3, FGFR1-4, PDGFRβ, RET, and KIT signaling networks. Based on efficacy results of the phase 2 study of patients (pts) with 131I-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC), this phase 3 Study of (E7080) Lenvatinib in Differentiated Cancer of the Thyroid (SELECT) was developed. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled study enrolled pts with RR-DTC with documented disease progression within 13 months (mo). Pts were stratified by age (≤65, >65 years), region and ≤1 prior VEGFR-targeted therapies and randomized 2:1 to LEN or PBO (24mg/d, 28-d cycle). Upon progression, pts receiving PBO could crossover to open-label LEN. The primary endpoint was PFS assessed by Independent Radiologic Review; secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + PR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: 392 pts (63.0 years median age; 51.0% male) were randomized. Pts on LEN had a significantly prolonged PFS vs PBO (hazard ratio 0.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14–0.31; P <.0001); median PFS was LEN: 18.3 mo (95% CI 15.1–not evaluable), PBO: 3.6 mo (95% CI 2.2–3.7). A LEN PFS benefit was observed in all predefined subgroups; median LEN PFS for pts with prior vs no prior VEGF-therapy was 15.1 mo (n=66) and 18.7 mo (n=195), respectively. Rates (n) of CRs were LEN: 1.5% (4), PBO: 0; PRs were LEN: 63.2% (165), PBO: 1.5% (2).Median exposure duration was LEN: 13.8 mo, PBO: 3.9 mo; median time to LEN response was 2.0 mo. Median OS has not been reached; deaths per arm were LEN: 71 (27.2%), PBO: 47 (35.9%). The 5 most common LEN treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; any grade) were hypertension (68%), diarrhea (59%), appetite decreased (50%), weight loss (46%), nausea (41%). LEN grade ≥3 TRAEs (≥5%) were hypertension (42%), proteinuria (10%), weight loss (10%), diarrhea (8%), appetite decreased (5%). The dose was reduced in 78.5% of pts and discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) in 14.2% of pts. Conclusions: LEN significantly improved PFS compared with PBO in pts with progressive RR-DTC. There were no unexpected toxicities and AEs were manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT01321554.

scholarly journals Fostamatinib for the treatment of hospitalized adults with COVD-19 A randomized trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R Strich ◽  
Xin Tian ◽  
Mohamed Samour ◽  
Christopher S King ◽  
Oksana Shlobin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Confirmatory Trials

Abstract Background Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) requiring hospitalization is characterized by robust antibody production, dysregulated immune response and immunothrombosis. Fostamatinib, is a novel spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitor we hypothesize will ameliorate Fc activation and attenuate harmful effects of the anti-COVID-19 immune response. Methods We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in hospitalized adults requiring oxygen with Covid-19 where patients receiving standard of care were randomized to receive fostamatinib or placebo. The primary outcome was serious adverse events by day 29. Results A total of 59 patients underwent randomization (30 to fostamatinib and 29 to placebo). Serious adverse events occurred in 10.5% of patients in the fostamatinib group compared to 22% in placebo (P = .2). Three deaths occurred by day 29, all receiving placebo. The mean change in ordinal score at day 15 was greater in the fostamatinib group (-3.6 ± 0.3 vs. -2.6 ± 0.4, P = .035) and the median length in the ICU was 3 days in the fostamatinib group vs. 7 days in placebo (P = .07). Differences in clinical improvement were most evident in patients with severe or critical disease (median days on oxygen, 10 vs. 28, P = .027). There were trends towards more rapid reductions in C-reactive protein, D-dimer, fibrinogen and ferritin levels in the fostamatinib group. Conclusion For COVID-19 requiring hospitalization, the addition of fostamatinib to standard of care was safe and patients were observed to have improved clinical outcomes compared to placebo. These results warrant further validation in larger confirmatory trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document