scholarly journals A Case of Effective Multidisciplinary Therapy for Gastric Endocrine Carcinoma with Bulky Metastatic Lymph Nodes

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 320-325
Author(s):  
Yoshiaki MIHARA ◽  
Koji MATSUSHITA ◽  
Nobumi TAGAYA
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Multidisciplinary Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Endocrine Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Lymph

Differentiation of Hyperplastic from Metastatic Lymph Nodes Using a Lymph Node Specific MR Contrast Agent Gadofluorine M

2006 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joo Hee Cha ◽  
Woo Kyung Moon ◽  
Jung Eun Cheon ◽  
Young Hwan Koh ◽  
Eun Hye Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Contrast Agent ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph ◽  
Gadofluorine M

ENT private eye for unknown primary metastatic lymph nodes

ORL ro ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (42) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Daniela Vrînceanu ◽  
Mihai Dumitru ◽  
Adriana Nica
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph ◽  
Private Eye

scholarly journals Apparent diffusion coefficient cannot discriminate metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Surov ◽  
Hans-Jonas Meyer ◽  
Maciej Pech ◽  
Maciej Powerski ◽  
Jasan Omari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Adc Value ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph ◽  
Apparent Diffusion ◽  
Adc Values

Abstract Background Our aim was to provide data regarding use of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for distinguishing metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes (LN) in rectal cancer. Methods MEDLINE library, EMBASE, and SCOPUS database were screened for associations between DWI and metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer up to February 2021. Overall, 9 studies were included into the analysis. Number, mean value, and standard deviation of DWI parameters including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic and non-metastatic LN were extracted from the literature. The methodological quality of the studies was investigated according to the QUADAS-2 assessment. The meta-analysis was undertaken by using RevMan 5.3 software. DerSimonian, and Laird random-effects models with inverse-variance weights were used to account the heterogeneity between the studies. Mean DWI values including 95% confidence intervals were calculated for metastatic and non-metastatic LN. Results ADC values were reported for 1376 LN, 623 (45.3%) metastatic LN, and 754 (54.7%) non-metastatic LN. The calculated mean ADC value (× 10−3 mm2/s) of metastatic LN was 1.05, 95%CI (0.94, 1.15). The calculated mean ADC value of the non-metastatic LN was 1.17, 95%CI (1.01, 1.33). The calculated sensitivity and specificity were 0.81, 95%CI (0.74, 0.89) and 0.67, 95%CI (0.54, 0.79). Conclusion No reliable ADC threshold can be recommended for distinguishing of metastatic and non-metastatic LN in rectal cancer.

Cystic metastatic lymph nodes in malignant melanoma: a case report

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 158-160
Author(s):  
Eralda Mema ◽  
Emma Cho ◽  
Richard Ha ◽  
Bret Taback
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Malignant Melanoma ◽  
Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph Nodes ◽  
Metastatic Lymph
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document