scholarly journals A Case of Mucosal Prolapse Performed by Delorme Procedure after Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (7) ◽  
pp. 1352-1359
Author(s):  
Koshiro HARATA ◽  
Nobuhiro HARUKI ◽  
Koji MIZOGUCHI ◽  
Tomokatsu KATO ◽  
Yuki DENDA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intersphincteric Resection ◽  
Mucosal Prolapse ◽  
Delorme Procedure ◽  
Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection

scholarly journals Neorectal mucosal prolapse after intersphincteric resection for low lying rectal cancer: a case report

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Alessa ◽  
Hyeon Woo Bae ◽  
Homoud Alawfi ◽  
Ahmad Sakr ◽  
Forzan Sauri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Intersphincteric Resection ◽  
Mucosal Prolapse

scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical Efficacy and Safety Between da Vinci Robotic and Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Zhang ◽  
Xingshun Qi ◽  
Fangfang Yi ◽  
Rongrong Cao ◽  
Guangrong Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Da Vinci ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
Intersphincteric Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Alternative Choice ◽  
Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection

Background and Aims: The intersphincteric resection (ISR) is beneficial for saving patients' anus to a large extent and restoring original bowel continuity. Laparoscopic ISR (L-ISR) has its drawbacks, such as two-dimensional images, low motion flexibility, and unstable lens. Recently, da Vinci robotic ISR (R-ISR) is increasingly used worldwide. The purpose of this article is to compare the feasibility, safety, oncological outcomes, and clinical efficacy of R-ISR vs. L-ISR for low rectal cancer.Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched to identify comparative studies of R-ISR vs. L-ISR. Demographic, clinical, and outcome data were extracted. Mean difference (MD) and risk ratio (RR) with their corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.Results: Five studies were included. In total, 510 patients were included, of whom 273 underwent R-ISR and 237 L-ISR. Compared with L-ISR, R-ISR has significantly lower estimated intraoperative blood loss (MD = −23.31, 95% CI [−41.98, −4.64], P = 0.01), longer operative time (MD = 51.77, 95% CI [25.68, 77.86], P = 0.0001), hospitalization days (MD = −1.52, 95% CI [−2.10, 0.94], P < 0.00001), and postoperative urinary complications (RR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.16, 0.82], P = 0.02).Conclusions: The potential benefits of R-ISR are considered as a safe and feasible alternative choice for the treatment of low rectal tumors.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection using needlescopic instruments

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhiro Sakamoto ◽  
Yu Okazawa ◽  
Rina Takahashi ◽  
Kiichi Sugimoto ◽  
Hiromitsu Komiyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intersphincteric Resection ◽  
Needlescopic Instruments ◽  
Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection

Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
pp. 2811-2817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Woo Lim ◽  
Jung Wook Huh ◽  
Young Jin Kim ◽  
Hyeong Rok Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Intersphincteric Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection

Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Very Low Rectal Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 645-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshiya Fujimoto ◽  
Takashi Akiyoshi ◽  
Hiroya Kuroyanagi ◽  
Tsuyoshi Konishi ◽  
Masashi Ueno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Intersphincteric Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Very Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document