scholarly journals A CASE OF INTRAABDOMINAL FOREIGN BODY REQUIRING SINGLE-INCISION LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY

2011 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 1561-1564
Author(s):  
Ian FUKUDOME ◽  
Michiya KOBAYASHI ◽  
Ken DABANAKA ◽  
Shu KURAMOTO ◽  
Akihiro KAWAMURA ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

scholarly journals Single incision laparoscopic surgery technique for transanal removal of rectal foreign body

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (3) ◽  
pp. rju022-rju022 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Elias ◽  
T. Debs ◽  
S. Hage ◽  
B. Bassile ◽  
P. Hanna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Surgery Technique

scholarly journals Extraperitoneal Foreign Body in the Vesico-uterine Pouch Removed by Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery—A Case Report—

2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (9) ◽  
pp. 1759-1763
Author(s):  
Takayuki SHIMIZU ◽  
Mitsuru ISHIZUKA ◽  
Hiroyuki HACHIYA ◽  
Kazutoshi TAKAGI ◽  
Taku AOKI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Foreign Body ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery

scholarly journals A learning curve in using organ retractor for single-incision laparoscopic right colectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshio Shiraishi ◽  
Tetsuro Tominaga ◽  
Takashi Nonaka ◽  
Kiyoaki Hamada ◽  
Masato Araki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Single Incision ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Right Colon ◽  
Right Colon Cancer

AbstractSingle-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has the potential to improve perioperative outcomes, including less postoperative pain, shorter operation time, less blood loss, and shorter hospital stay. However, SILS is technically difficult and needs a longer learning curve. Between April 2016 and September 2019, a total of 198 patients with clinical stage I/II right colon cancer underwent curative resection. In the case of the SILS approach, an organ retractor was usually used to overcome SILS-specific restrictions. The patients were divided into two groups by surgical approach: the SILS with organ retractor group (SILS-O, n = 33) and the conventional laparoscopic surgery group (LAC, n = 165). Clinical T status was significantly higher in the LAC group (p = 0.016). Operation time was shorter and blood loss was lower in the SILS-O group compared to the LAC group (117 vs. 197 min, p = 0.027; 10 vs. 25 mL, p = 0.024, respectively). In the SILS-O group, surgical outcomes including operation time, blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and postoperative complications were not significantly different between those performed by experts and by non-experts. Longer operation time (p = 0.041) was significantly associated with complications on univariate and multivariate analyses (odds ratio 2.514, 95%CI 1.047–6.035, p = 0.039). SILS-O was safe and feasible for right colon cancer. There is a potential to shorten the learning curve of SILS using an organ retractor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document