Cultural studies et économie politique de la communication : quel rapport au marxisme ?

Réseaux ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol n° 192 (4) ◽  
pp. 87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gérôme Guibert ◽  
Nelly Quemener
Réseaux ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol n° 192 (4) ◽  
pp. 45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Garnham ◽  
Céline Morin

Réseaux ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol n° 192 (4) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Lawrence Grossberg ◽  
Céline Morin

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Éric George ◽  
Oumar Kane

In this article, the authors show the relevance of a dialogue between several critical perspectives in order to properly analyse the digital information and communications technology (ICT). If the political economy of communication is relevant to highlight the inequalities and power relations in the organization of communication systems, this approach is limited when it comes to taking into account the autonomy of the social agents. They propose therefore to articulate in the analysis the structures of domination with the emancipatory potentialities through the combination of political economy of communication and cultural studies, without ignoring the materiality of the technologies. This would contribute to a critical intelligibility of the overall economy of digital technologies in the network age.Dans cette contribution, les auteurs proposent de montrer la pertinence de faire dialoguer plusieurs perspectives critiques afin d’analyser les technologies numériques d’information et de communication (TNIC). Ils montrent que l’économie politique de la communication, pertinente pour mettre en évidence les inégalités et les rapports de pouvoir dans l’organisation des systèmes de communication, est limitée quand il s’agit de tenir compte de la part d’autonomie dans les jeux d’acteurs. Ils proposent en conséquence d’articuler les analyses des structures de domination et des potentialités d’émancipation en combinant économie politique et cultural studies, sans oublier la prise en compte de la matérialité des dispositifs techniques. Agencer ces travaux contribuerait à une intelligibilité critique de l’économie globale des technologies numériques à l’ère des réseaux.


2020 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Bender

Abstract Tomasello argues in the target article that, in generalizing the concrete obligations originating from interdependent collaboration to one's entire cultural group, humans become “ultra-cooperators.” But are all human populations cooperative in similar ways? Based on cross-cultural studies and my own fieldwork in Polynesia, I argue that cooperation varies along several dimensions, and that the underlying sense of obligation is culturally modulated.


1999 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 196-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosario Martínez-Arias ◽  
Fernando Silva ◽  
Ma Teresa Díaz-Hidalgo ◽  
Generós Ortet ◽  
Micaela Moro

Summary: This paper presents the results obtained in Spain with The Interpersonal Adjective Scales of J.S. Wiggins (1995) concerning the variables' structure. There are two Spanish versions of IAS, developed by two independent research groups who were not aware of each other's work. One of these versions was published as an assessment test in 1996. Results from the other group have remained unpublished to date. The set of results presented here compares three sources of data: the original American manual (from Wiggins and collaborators), the Spanish manual (already published), and the new IAS (our own research). Results can be considered satisfactory since, broadly speaking, the inner structure of the original instrument is well replicated in the Spanish version.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document