Enquête sur l’excision en Afrique coloniale. Une correspondance entre le Colonial Office et le Service de Santé coloniale français (1949)

Outre-mers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol N° 410-411 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-292
Author(s):  
Jeanne Garcíai
Keyword(s):  
Colonial Office

Notes on the Petrology of the Gadabusi Country, British Somaliland

1936 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 365-378
Author(s):  
John Parkinson
Keyword(s):  
Crystalline Rock ◽  
Early History ◽  
History Of ◽  
Colonial Office

During the course of several journeys from the port of Zeilah southwards across the Ban or Plain to Buramo on the Abyssinian frontier, collections were made of characteristic crystalline rock groups in the hope of elucidating to some degree the composition and early history of the district. Permission to publish these notes was kindly given by the Colonial Office.

Who Ran the British Empire 1830-1850?

1965 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Taft Manning
Keyword(s):  
Nineteenth Century ◽  
British Empire ◽  
Colonial Administration ◽  
Historical Writing ◽  
The People ◽  
Mother Country ◽  
The Government ◽  
Colonial Office

Patterns of historical writing are notoriously difficult to change. Much of what is still being written about colonial administration in the nineteenth-century British Empire rests on the partisan and even malicious writings of critics of the Government in England in the 1830s and '40s who had never seen the colonial correspondence and were unfamiliar with existing conditions in the distant colonies. The impression conveyed in most textbooks is that the Colonial Office after 1815 was a well-established bureaucracy concerned with the policies of the mother country in the overseas possessions, and that those policies changed very slowly and only under pressure. Initially Edward Gibbon Wakefield and Charles Buller were responsible for this Colonial Office legend, but it was soon accepted by most of the people who had business to transact there. Annoyed by the fact that the measures proposed by the Wakefield group did not meet with instant acceptance, Wakefield and Buller attacked the Permanent Under-Secretary, James Stephen, as the power behind the throne in 14 Downing Street and assumed that his ideas of right and wrong were being imposed willy-nilly on the unfortunate colonists and would-be colonists.The picture of Stephen as all-powerful in shaping imperial policy was probably strengthened by the publication in 1885 of Henry Taylor's Autobiography. Taylor was one of Stephen's warmest admirers and had served with him longer than anyone else; when he stated that for a quarter of a century Stephen “more than any one man virtually governed the British Empire,” historians were naturally inclined to give credence to his words.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document