scholarly journals Coexpression of EGFR and HER-2 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A comparative study using immunohistochemistry correlated with gene amplification by fluorescencent in situ hybridization

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Dancer ◽  
Hidehiro Takei ◽  
Jae Ro ◽  
Mary Lowery-Nordberg
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Her 2

A PILOT STUDY OF HER-2/NEU GENE AMPLIFICATION ASSESSED BY FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH) IN GASTRIC CANCER

2014 ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Van Huy Tran ◽  
Thi Minh Thi Ha ◽  
Trung Nghia Van ◽  
Viet Nhan Nguyen ◽  
Phan Tuong Quynh Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Background: HER-2/neu is a predictive biomarker for treatment of gastric cancer using trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the status of HER-2/neu gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in gastric cancer. Patients and methods: thirty six gastric cancer patients were assessed HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH using PathVysionTM HER-2 DNA Probe kit (including HER-2/neu probe and CEP-17 probe) with biopsy and surgical specimens. Results: The HER-2/neu gene amplification was observed in three cases (8.3%), the HER-2/neu gene amplification rate in Lauren’s intestinal-type and diffuse-type were 11.8% and 5.2%, respectively. Conclusion: We applied successfully FISH technique with gastric cancer tissue samples. This technique could be performed as routine test in gastric cancer in order to select patients that benefit from trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy.

Evaluation of HER-2/neu Gene Amplification and Overexpression: Comparison of Frequently Used Assay Methods in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of Breast Cancer Specimens

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 3095-3105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael F. Press ◽  
Dennis J. Slamon ◽  
Kerry J. Flom ◽  
Jinha Park ◽  
Jian-Yuan Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Medical Systems ◽  
Immunohistochemical Assay ◽  
Clinical Assay ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Assay Methods

PURPOSE: To compare and evaluate HER-2/neu clinical assay methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventeen breast cancer specimens with known HER-2/neu amplification and overexpression status were assayed with four different immunohistochemical assays and two different fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays. RESULTS: The accuracy of the FISH assays for HER-2/neu gene amplification was high, 97.4% for the Vysis PathVision assay (Vysis, Inc, Downers Grove, IL) and 95.7% for the the Ventana INFORM assay (Ventana, Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ). The immunohistochemical assay with the highest accuracy for HER-2/neu overexpression was obtained with R60 polyclonal antibody (96.6%), followed by immunohistochemical assays performed with 10H8 monoclonal antibody (95.7%), the Ventana CB11 monoclonal antibody (89.7%), and the DAKO HercepTest (88.9%; Dako, Corp, Carpinteria, CA). Only the sensitivities, and therefore, overall accuracy, of the DAKO Herceptest and Ventana CB11 immunohistochemical assays were significantly different from the more sensitive FISH assay. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, the FISH assays were highly accurate, with immunohistochemical assays performed with R60 and 10H8 nearly as accurate. The DAKO HercepTest and the Ventana CB11 immunohistochemical assay were statistically significantly different from the Vysis FISH assay in evaluating these previously molecularly characterized breast cancer specimens.

HER-2/neu Analysis in Archival Tissue Samples of Human Breast Cancer: Comparison of Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 354-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Lebeau ◽  
Daniela Deimling ◽  
Christine Kaltz ◽  
Andrea Sendelhofert ◽  
Anette Iff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Paraffin Sections ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Her 2

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to compare the methods used in the literature to analyze HER-2/neu status on archival breast cancer tissue. Therefore, a series of antibodies was evaluated to assess their immunohistochemical (IHC) sensitivity in correlation to gene amplification determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: HER-2/neu overexpression was studied on paraffin sections of 85 invasive breast cancers using a panel of five monoclonal (9G6, 3B5, CB11, TAB250, GSF-HER2) and two polyclonal antibodies (A8010, A0485) in addition to the HercepTest (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH using a dual-color probe (PathVysion; Vysis, Stuttgart-Fasanenhof, Germany). RESULTS: HER-2/neu overexpression was demonstrated in 26% (9G6, TAB250, GSF-HER2), 27% (3B5, CB11), 33% (A8010) and 42% (A0485, HercepTest) of the tumors. FISH on paraffin sections identified gene amplification in 28% of the tumors. Strongly positive IHC results (3+) were always associated with gene amplification. Among the 16 tumors presented with weakly positive IHC results (2+) using the HercepTest, 12 (75%) lacked gene amplification. CONCLUSION: The comparison of IHC and FISH demonstrated an excellent correlation of high-level HER-2/neu overexpression (3+) with gene amplification; ie, FISH does not provide further information in these tumors. However, weakly positive IHC results (2+) obtained with the HercepTest share only a minor association with gene amplification.

Assessment of Methods for Tissue-Based Detection of the HER-2/neu Alteration in Human Breast Cancer: A Direct Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (21) ◽  
pp. 3651-3664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Pauletti ◽  
Suganda Dandekar ◽  
HongMei Rong ◽  
Lilllian Ramos ◽  
HongJun Peng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Survival Probability ◽  
Human Breast Cancer ◽  
Patient Survival ◽  
Human Breast ◽  
Her 2

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) in detecting the HER-2/neu alteration in human breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Unselected stage I, II, and III breast cancer patients (N = 900) were tested for HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH in paraffin-embedded, formalin-fixed archival material. Of these samples, 856 were tested for HER-2/neu overexpression by non–antigen-retrieval IHC with the polyclonal antibody R60, the sensitivity and specificity of which was preliminarily compared with the United States Food and Drug Administration–approved HercepTest (Dako Corp, Carpinteria, CA). Patient survival was analyzed in relation to the presence of the HER-2/neu alteration as determined by these two methodologies. RESULTS: A total of 189 (21%) of 900 patients were positive by FISH and 147 (17.2%) of 856 were positive by IHC. This discrepancy is consistent with expected loss of IHC sensitivity associated with tissue fixation/embedding. The HercepTest did not improve sensitivity and introduced false positives. Comparison of R60-based IHC with FISH demonstrates that patient survival is associated progressively to gene amplification level as determined by FISH, whereas for IHC an association is found only in the highest (3+) immunostaining group. Among FISH-negative tumors, 45 (6.6%) of 678 were IHC-positive, with a survival probability similar to that of FISH-negative/IHC-negative cases; FISH-positive/IHC-negative patients have a survival probability similar to that of FISH-positive/IHC-positive cases. CONCLUSION: IHC does not consistently discriminate patients likely to have a poor prognosis, whereas FISH provides superior prognostic information in segregating high-risk from lower-risk beast cancers. HER-2/neu protein overexpression in the absence of gene amplification occurs infrequently in breast cancer, in which case, patient outcome is similar to that of patients without the alteration.

HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2894-2904 ◽  
Author(s):  
M F Press ◽  
L Bernstein ◽  
P A Thomas ◽  
L F Meisner ◽  
J Y Zhou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Southern Hybridization ◽  
Recurrent Disease ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Her 2

PURPOSE The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification. RESULTS Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied. CONCLUSION FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document