scholarly journals A novel technique for removing large gastric subepithelial tumors with ESD method in the subcardia region

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingtuan Liu ◽  
Han Chen ◽  
Weifeng Zhang ◽  
Guoxin Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Novel Technique ◽  
Gastric Subepithelial Tumors ◽  
Subepithelial Tumors

scholarly journals Endoscopic ultrasound without tissue acquisition has poor accuracy for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors

Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (44) ◽  
pp. e5246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Won Lim ◽  
Cheol Woong Choi ◽  
Dae Hwan Kang ◽  
Hyung Wook Kim ◽  
Su Bum Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Tissue Acquisition ◽  
Gastric Subepithelial Tumors ◽  
Subepithelial Tumors

Endoscopic enucleation for gastric subepithelial tumors originating in the muscularis propria layer

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 468-474 ◽  
Author(s):  
In Du Jeong ◽  
Seok Won Jung ◽  
Sung-Jo Bang ◽  
Jung Woo Shin ◽  
Neung Hwa Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Muscularis Propria ◽  
Muscularis Propria Layer ◽  
Gastric Subepithelial Tumors ◽  
Endoscopic Enucleation ◽  
Subepithelial Tumors

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors: a pilot study

Endoscopy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (06) ◽  
pp. 560-565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Ming Zhang ◽  
Ning Zhong ◽  
Xiao Wang ◽  
Chang-Qing Li ◽  
Rui Ji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Image Quality ◽  
Endoscopic Ultrasound ◽  
Diagnostic Yield ◽  
Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy ◽  
Confocal Laser ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Gastric Subepithelial Tumors ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Subepithelial Tumors

Abstract Background The diagnostic yield of current techniques for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) is suboptimal. This prospective study aimed to develop diagnostic criteria for needle-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (nCLE) of gastric SETs, and to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy, feasibility, and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided nCLE (EUS-nCLE). Methods Eligible patients were prospectively recruited to undergo EUS-nCLE. Four unblinded investigators evaluated nCLE videos and corresponding histopathology to develop the nCLE criteria. The recorded nCLE videos were reviewed off-line by one endoscopist 3 months later. Image quality (five-point scale, 1 = poor and 5 = very good) and the interobserver agreements were assessed. Results All 33 patients underwent successful EUS-nCLE procedures. The nCLE criteria for gastric SETs were established. Overall accuracy of off-line nCLE was significantly higher than that of EUS alone (87.9 % vs. 63.6 %; P = 0.02). The mean image quality score was 3.9. The kappa values of the interobserver agreements were 0.66 for gastrointestinal stromal tumor, 0.89 for ectopic pancreas, 0.58 for leiomyoma, and 0.72 for carcinoma. Conclusions EUS-nCLE was feasible and safe to accurately diagnose gastric SETs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document