scholarly journals Comparison of the 8th union for international cancer control lymph node staging system for gastric cancer with two other lymph node staging systems

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huihua Cao ◽  
Zhaoqing Tang ◽  
Zhan Yu ◽  
Qing Wang ◽  
Zhong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Cancer Control ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Staging Systems

Comparison of lymph node staging system in gastric cancer using time-dependent ROC analysis with Harrell’s concordance index.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
Etsuro Bando ◽  
Norihiko Sugisawa ◽  
Masanori Tokunaga ◽  
Yutaka Tanizawa ◽  
Taiichi Kawamura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Node Negative ◽  
Staging Systems

12 Background: The aim this study was to clarify what the most informative pathologic lymph node staging system in gastric cancer is, by using time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis with Harrell’s concordance (c) index. Methods: This study enrolled 2747 primary gastric cancer patients, without prior chemotherapy, who underwent R0 or R1 macroscopically curative resection. We calculated concordance indices of different 3 nodal staging systems (anatomical level based on JPN 13th edition vs. numbers of metastatic nodes based upon TNM 7th edition vs. ratio of metastatic nodes; derived from Yu’s definition {Yu et al. Br J Surg;1997,N0:0, N1;0-0.1, N2;0.1-0.25, N3;0.25-}) for survival. Results: (Anatomical level) Harrell’s c-index was 0.754 with 5-year survival rate of N0; 93%, N1; 73%, N2; 51%, N3; 19%. C-index without node-negative patients was 0.628. (Numbers of positive nodes) C-index was 0.767 with 5-year survival rate of N0; 93%, N1; 81%, N2; 68%, N3; 37%. C-index without node-negative patients was 0.669. (Ratio of nodal involvement) C-index was 0.770 with 5-year survival rate of N0; 93%, N1; 80%, N2; 63%, N3; 29%. C-index without node-negative patients was 0.691, which is significantly larger than those in anatomical level or numbers of positive nodes (p<0.001, p=0.014, respectively). (Comparison of Staging System) If combined pT category with ratio grading system without pStage IA, new staging system is the significantly most informative (c-index; 0.760) than JPN 13th (c-index; 0.735) or TNM 7th (c-index; 0.742) (p=0.009, p=0.023, respectively). Conclusions: Lymph node staging system based on the conception of ratio of metastatic nodes is the most informative staging system than those with anatomical location or numbers of metastatic nodes. These results suggested that in gastric cancer pathologic staging system in next TNM classification should include the ratio of metastatic nodes.

A novel simplified approach to incorporating lymph node ratio into gastric cancer staging.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 24-24
Author(s):  
Sarah B. Fisher ◽  
Malcolm Hart Squires ◽  
Sameer H. Patel ◽  
David A. Kooby ◽  
Kenneth Cardona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Ratio ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Cancer Staging ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Simplified Approach ◽  
Staging Systems ◽  
Node Ratio

24 Background: Previous investigators have reported on the value of lymph node ratio (LNR, defined as the number of positive nodes divided by the total number of nodes assessed) in gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) staging. Given the complexity of previously proposed staging systems, it has not gained widespread acceptance. The aim of our study was to offer a novel simplified approach to incorporating LNR into gastric cancer staging. Methods: 131 patients who underwent curative intent resection with lymphadenectomy for GAC between 1/00-6/11 were identified. Clinicopathologic factors were assessed. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Results: Median age was 64 yrs, 51% were male. Median tumor size was 3.5 cm, 67% were poorly differentiated, 20% had perineural invasion, 31% had lymphovascular invasion, and 6% had a positive margin. Locoregional nodal metastases were present in 59% (n=77, N0: 41%, N1: 18%, N2: 22%, N3a: 14%, N3b: 5%). Median number of lymph nodes (LN) assessed was 15.5. Mean FU was 27.3 mos, median OS was 29.3 mos. Median LNR was 0.4 (.04-1). Patients with LNR ≥0.4 had decreased OS as compared to patients with LNR <0.4 (15.1 vs 41.5 mos, p<0.0001); the survival of patients with LNR <0.4 was similar to that of node negative pts (48 mos, p=0.882). On Cox regression analysis, LNR ≥0.4 was more strongly associated with decreased OS (HR 3.09, 95%CI: 1.81-5.26; p<0.0001) compared to the AJCC 7th edition N stage (HR 1.36, 95%CI: 1.11-1.68; p=0.004). In the subset of patients who were inadequately staged and had <16 nodes examined, a LNR ≥0.4 was associated with reduced survival compared to a LNR <0.4 (17.3 vs 41.5 mos, p=.04). Conclusions: Compared to the current lymph node staging system, a lymph node ratio using 0.4 as the cutoff may more accurately predict survival outcomes. It seems to be particularly useful in patients who have inadequate nodal assessment. This simplified approach to lymph node ratio may be a more valuable staging tool than the current AJCC nodal staging system for gastric cancer and needs to be validated.

Proposal of a new lymph node staging system for gastric cancer: study from two institutions in China

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jizhun Zhang ◽  
Kewei Jiang ◽  
Yong Liu ◽  
Yingjiang Ye ◽  
Liang Lv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Cancer Study ◽  
Gastric Cancer Study

scholarly journals A Lymph Node Staging System for Gastric Cancer: A Hybrid Type Based on Topographic and Numeric Systems

PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e0149555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon Young Choi ◽  
Ji Yeong An ◽  
Hitoshi Katai ◽  
Yasuyuki Seto ◽  
Takeo Fukagawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Hybrid Type

scholarly journals Lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer treated with D2 resection plus adjuvant chemotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 660-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Xin Zhou ◽  
Lu-Ping Yang ◽  
Zi-Xian Wang ◽  
Ming-Ming He ◽  
Jing-Ping Yun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Staging Systems

scholarly journals Comparison of the current AJCC-TNM numeric-based with a new anatomical location-based lymph node staging system for gastric cancer: A western experience

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e0173619 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gennaro Galizia ◽  
Eva Lieto ◽  
Annamaria Auricchio ◽  
Francesca Cardella ◽  
Andrea Mabilia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Anatomical Location ◽  
Western Experience

scholarly journals Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in prognosis of gastric cancer: a bi-institutional study from Hungary

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 323-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dezső Tóth ◽  
◽  
Adrienn Bíró ◽  
Zsolt Varga ◽  
Miklós Török ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Staging Systems

Optimal prognostic lymph node staging system for gallbladder adenocarcinoma: A multi-institutional study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 364-364
Author(s):  
Neda Amini ◽  
Yuhree Kim ◽  
Ana Wilson ◽  
Cecilia Grace Ethun ◽  
Shishir Kumar Maithel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lymph Node ◽  
Staging System ◽  
Lymph Node Staging ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Curative Intent ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Staging Systems ◽  
Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Better Than

364 Background: The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) classification is the most universally accepted lymph node (LN) staging system for gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBA); however, it focuses more on location of LN metastasis than number of LN metastasis. Other lymph node staging systems have been proposed for GBA. We therefore sought to examine the performance of different staging systems including AJCC LN staging system, number of metastatic LN (NMLN), log odds of metastatic LN (LODDS), and LN ratio (LNR). Methods: Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for GBA between 2000 and 2015 and who had lymphadenectomy were identified from a multi-institutional database. The prognostic performance of four staging systems was compared by Harrell’s C and Akaike information criterion (AIC). Results: Overall 214 patients with a median age of 66.7 years (IQR 56.5, 73.1) were identified. A total 1,334 LNs were retrieved from 214 patients, with a median of 4 (IQR 2-8) LNs per patient. In the study cohort, 98 (45.5%) patients had LN metastasis with total of 271 positive LNs [median of 1 (IQR 1-3)]. Patients with LN metastasis had an increased risk of death (HR 1.87, 95%CI 1.24-2.82; P = 0.003). In addition, risk of death increased by each additional LN metastasis (HR 1.20, 95%CI 1.06-1.37; P = 0.005). In the entire cohort, LNR, in either a continuous (C-index: 0.603, AIC: 808.4) or a discrete scale (C-index 0.609, AIC 802.2), provided better discrimination versus LODDS, AJCC LN staging system, and NMLN. The relative performance of all scoring systems was better among patients who had ≥ 4 LN examined. In the cohort of patients with ≥ 4 LN examined, LODDS (C-index 0.621, AIC 363.8) had the best performance compared with LNR (C-index 0.615, AIC 368.7), AJCC LN staging system (C-index 0.601, AIC 373.4), and NMLN (C-index 0.613, AIC 369.5). Conclusions: LODDS and LNR performed better than the AJCC LN staging system. Among those who had more LN examined, LODDS performed better than LNR. LODDS and LNR should be incorporated into the AJCC LN staging system of GBA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document