scholarly journals Acute myeloid leukemia with t(3;21)(q26.2;q22) developing following low-dose methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis and expressing two AML1/MDS1/EVI1 fusion proteins: A case report

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keisuke Tanaka ◽  
Gaku Oshikawa ◽  
Hiroki Akiyama ◽  
Shinya Ishida ◽  
Toshikage Nagao ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (12) ◽  
pp. 2841-2843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuhisa Chonabayashi ◽  
Yoshinori Yoshida ◽  
Toshio Kitawaki ◽  
Yasuhito Nannya ◽  
Momoko Nakamura ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 371-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharati Kolte ◽  
Alan N. Baer ◽  
Sheila N.J. Sait ◽  
Kieran L. Oloughlin ◽  
Carleton C. Stewart ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 91 (9) ◽  
pp. 3503-3508 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Zikos ◽  
M.T. Van Lint ◽  
F. Frassoni ◽  
T. Lamparelli ◽  
F. Gualandi ◽  
...  

Abstract Sixty patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplant for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1; n = 49) or more advanced phase (n = 11) were entered in a prospective trial of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis: low-dose cyclosporin A (IdCSA; 1 mg/kg/d from day −1 to +20 day; n = 28) or IdCSA plus low-dose methotrexate (IdMTX; 10 mg/m2 for day +1, 8 mg/m2 for days +3, +6, and +11; n = 32). Primary end points were acute GvHD (aGvHD) and transplant-related mortality (TRM); secondary end points were relapse and survival. The conditioning regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) and fractionated total body irradiation (3.3 Gy/d for 3 consecutive days). The actuarial risk of developing aGvHD grade II-III was 61% for IdCSA alone and 34% for IdCSA + IdMTX (P = .02). The actuarial risk of TRM at 1 year was 11% versus 13%, respectively, and older patients (≧29 years) had higher TRM than younger patients (22% v 5%,P = .01). The age effect was significant in the IdCSA group (P = .04) but not in the IdCSA + IdMTX group (P = .1). The median follow-up is 4.4 years, with an overall actuarial survival of 78% for CR1 patients and 36% for patients with advanced disease. For patients in CR1 the outcome of the two regimens was as follows: survival 77% versus 80% (P = .6), relapse 20% versus 9% (P = .1), and TRM 13% versus 17% (P = .6). This study suggests that TRM can be reduced in AML patients undergoing allogeneic marrow transplants with a mild conditioning regimen and low-dose immunosuppression, and this translates in a 78% 5-year survival for CR1 patients. Beyond CR1 the major obstacle remains leukemia relapse, which is not prevented by low-dose in vivo immunosuppression.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 25-26
Author(s):  
Juliana Santos Carvalho ◽  
Anna Flávia Silva Alves Silva ◽  
Maysa Coité Silva ◽  
Itala Gomes Santos ◽  
Laryssa Pinto Aragão ◽  
...  

INTRODUCTION: The occurrence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and chronic lymphoid leukemia (B-CLL) simultaneously is rarely described. We describe a case report of AML and B-CLL, diagnosed simultaneously, without any previous treatment for any of the hematological neoplasms [1]. The patient received low-dose cytarabine (ARA-C) and Venetoclax, which is medically indicated on label for both hematological neoplasms. CASE REPORT: A 75-year-old male, presented with edema and joint pain one month before hospital admission, showing pancytopenia on a complete blood count and presence of blasts in peripheral blood. The patient was then referred to the hematology service. The morphological analysis of the bone marrow aspirate showed 67.7% of myeloblasts, compatible with AML. Bone marrow immunophenotyping was performed, which identified 34.10% of myeloblasts, compatible with AML and 50.48% of monoclonal B lymphocytes (chronic B-cell lymphoproliferative disease). In flow cytometry there were two distinct populations of myeloblasts. Type 1 myeloblasts labeling CD7 +, CD13 +, CD34 ++, CD38 ++, CD45 ++, CD56 ++, CD117 ++, CD123 +, HLA-DR +++ and MPO + / ++. The second population marked CD13 + / ++, CD34 + / ++, CD38 ++, CD45 +, CD117 ++, CD123 +, HLA-DR ++ / +++ and MPO + (30%). Monoclonal lymphocytes showed CD11c + / ++ (70%), CD19 ++, CD20 + / ++ (84%), CD22 + (39%), CD23 + / ++, CD25 +, CD31 +/-, CD43 ++, CD45 ++ / +++, CD81 + (38%), CD200 + (85%) and Lambda +. The molecular study was negative for genetic abnormalities: FLT3, KIT and NPM, configuring the patient as an intermediate risk for AML. In the cytogenetic analysis there was no growth of metaphases. Patient received simultaneous diagnosis of AML and B-CLL. As he was ineligle to intensive chemotherapy (IC), we started original protocol Subcutaneous Cytarabin+venetoclax(VIALE C). The patient had grade 2-3 AE(neutropenia managed with GCSF) ending the fourth cycle in July 2020. The evolution of hematimetric parameters and diseases are described in graphics. DISCUSSION: This is the first described case in our knowledge treated upfront with bcl2-inh target therapy for two absolutely different hematological neoplasms: AML and BCLL. Nowadays we are experiencing a new therapeutic model in oncohematology, in which the targeted therapy is gaining ground in relation to IC with excellent results. In this way, the importance of comprehension of the pathophysiological mechanism of the neoplasms and the way we can stop the disease proliferation is progressively guiding the new protocols. Elderly patients are more likely to have early treatment-related death and exhibit therapeutic resistance, limiting alternatives. We decided to start first-line treatment with ARA-C and Venetoclax [2]. Venetoclax associated with ARA-C has a manageable safety profile, producing quick and durable remissions in elderly people with AML ineligible for IC, as well as in B CLL, being the best therapeutic alternative for the case, in our opinion. Venetoclax belongs to a group of drugs called Bcl-2 inhibitors, an anti-apoptotic protein, which works by blocking this protein in the body, causing apoptosis of both neoplastic cells. The high rate of remission and low early mortality, combined with fast and durable remission, make Venetoclax and ARA-C a new and attractive treatment for the elderly [2]. In our case, the intention of the product in the first line was not B-CLL, but it would certainly be a good option for this profile of elderly patients. CONCLUSION: We report the first description of simultaneous diagnosis of AML and B CLL treated with a Bcl-2 inhibitor, demonstrating that antitumor mechanisms can be extremely effective in completely different diseases. We have a long way to go in the search for full knowledge of oncohematological diseases and targeted therapies. However, this case report shows that we are on the right track. References: 1. MUSSAED, Eman Al; OSMAN, Hani; ELYAMANY, Ghaleb. Simultaneous existence of acute myeloid leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a case report.Bmc Cancer.Springer Science and Business Media LLC. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2780-5. 2. WEI, Andrew H.; et al. Venetoclax Combined With Low-Dose Cytarabine for Previously Untreated Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: results from a phase ib/ii study.Journal Of Clinical Oncology, [S.L.], 20 maio 2019. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.18.01600. Figure Disclosures De Queiroz Crusoe: Janssen:Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 91 (9) ◽  
pp. 3503-3508
Author(s):  
P. Zikos ◽  
M.T. Van Lint ◽  
F. Frassoni ◽  
T. Lamparelli ◽  
F. Gualandi ◽  
...  

Sixty patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplant for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1; n = 49) or more advanced phase (n = 11) were entered in a prospective trial of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis: low-dose cyclosporin A (IdCSA; 1 mg/kg/d from day −1 to +20 day; n = 28) or IdCSA plus low-dose methotrexate (IdMTX; 10 mg/m2 for day +1, 8 mg/m2 for days +3, +6, and +11; n = 32). Primary end points were acute GvHD (aGvHD) and transplant-related mortality (TRM); secondary end points were relapse and survival. The conditioning regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide (120 mg/kg) and fractionated total body irradiation (3.3 Gy/d for 3 consecutive days). The actuarial risk of developing aGvHD grade II-III was 61% for IdCSA alone and 34% for IdCSA + IdMTX (P = .02). The actuarial risk of TRM at 1 year was 11% versus 13%, respectively, and older patients (≧29 years) had higher TRM than younger patients (22% v 5%,P = .01). The age effect was significant in the IdCSA group (P = .04) but not in the IdCSA + IdMTX group (P = .1). The median follow-up is 4.4 years, with an overall actuarial survival of 78% for CR1 patients and 36% for patients with advanced disease. For patients in CR1 the outcome of the two regimens was as follows: survival 77% versus 80% (P = .6), relapse 20% versus 9% (P = .1), and TRM 13% versus 17% (P = .6). This study suggests that TRM can be reduced in AML patients undergoing allogeneic marrow transplants with a mild conditioning regimen and low-dose immunosuppression, and this translates in a 78% 5-year survival for CR1 patients. Beyond CR1 the major obstacle remains leukemia relapse, which is not prevented by low-dose in vivo immunosuppression.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 593-599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingshan Liu ◽  
Roshni Narurkar ◽  
Madhura Hanmantgad ◽  
Wahib Zafar ◽  
Yongping Song ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document