scholarly journals Combination chemotherapy with TAS‑102 plus bevacizumab in salvage‑line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: A single‑center, retrospective study examining the prognostic value of the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score in salvage‑line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuhisa Matsuhashi ◽  
Takao Takahashi ◽  
Hironori Fujii ◽  
Tomonari Suetsugu ◽  
Masahiro Fukada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Glasgow Prognostic Score ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score ◽  
Line Therapy

scholarly journals Prognostic Value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score or Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Receiving Various Treatments: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 1237-1249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liying He ◽  
Hui Li ◽  
Jianye Cai ◽  
Liang Chen ◽  
Jia Yao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Glasgow Prognostic Score ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score ◽  
Tumor Stages ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
The Glasgow Prognostic Score

Background/Aims: Increasing evidence indicates that the systemic inflammatory response plays a vital role in carcinogenesis. The Glasgow Prognostic Score or modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (GPS/mGPS) is a novel inflammatory indicator which consists of CRP and albumin. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of the GPS/ mGPS in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to assess its consistency in different CRC therapies. Methods: The electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception through December 2017 for the association between the GPS/mGPS and clinical outcomes. Study characteristics and prognostic data were extracted from each relevant study. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were considered the primary outcomes, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The quality of each study was pooled using the random-effects Mantel-Haenszel model. Finally, subgroup analyses were performed to detect the heterogeneity of different CRC treatments. Results: Thirty-four studies, with a combined total of 8834 patients, were eligible for this meta-analysis. Data on OS and CSS were available in 23 and 22 studies, respectively. By comparing the prognostic values of different levels of the GPS in CRC patients, the summary HRs for OS and CSS were 2.18 (95% CI 1.83-2.60) and 1.82 (95% CI 1.57-2.11), respectively. According to the different tumor stages, the subgroup analyses were stratified by different treatments, including curative or palliative therapy. The results robustly confirmed the prognostic role of the GPS/mGPS. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the GPS/mGPS is a novel and effective prognostic indicator for the OS and CSS of patients with CRC.

Prognostic value of the Glasgow Prognostic Score in metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of anti-EGFR therapies

2013 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Johann Dréanic ◽  
Marianne Maillet ◽  
Marion Dhooge ◽  
Olivier Mir ◽  
Catherine Brezault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Glasgow Prognostic Score ◽  
The Glasgow Prognostic Score

Efficacy and Toxicity of Addition of Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 718-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wen-Cong Ruan ◽  
Yue-Ping Che ◽  
Li Ding ◽  
Hai-Feng Li
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Event ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Clinical Prognosis ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Pre-treated patients with first-line treatment can be offered a second treatment with the aim of improving their poor clinical prognosis. The therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who did not respond to first-line therapy has limited treatment options. Recently, many studies have paid much attention to the efficacy of bevacizumab as an adjuvant treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared with bevacizumab-naive based chemotherapy as second-line treatment in people with metastatic CRC. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies updated to March 2018. Randomized-controlled trials comparing addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy without bevacizumab in MCRC patients were included, of which, the main interesting results were the efficacy and safety profiles of the addition of bevacizumab in patients with MCRC as second-line therapy. Result: Five trials were eligible in the meta-analysis. Patients who received the combined bevacizumab and chemotherapy treatment in MCRC as second-line therapy showed a longer overall survival (OS) (OR=0.80,95%CI=0.72-0.89, P<0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (OR=0.69,95%CI=0.61-0.77, P<0.00001). In addition, there was no significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) (RR=1.36,95%CI=0.82-2.24, P=0.23) or severe adverse event (SAE) (RR=1.02,95%CI=0.88-1.19, P=0.78) between bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and bevacizumabnaive based chemotherapy. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the addition of bevacizumab to the chemotherapy therapy could be an efficient and safe treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer as second-line therapy and without increasing the risk of an adverse event.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document