scholarly journals Lung cancer patients with synchronous colon cancer

Author(s):  
Koich Kurishima ◽  
Kunihiko Miyazaki ◽  
Hiroko Watanabe ◽  
Toshihiro Shiozawa ◽  
Hiroichi Ishikawa ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 3515-3515
Author(s):  
Isabelle Borget ◽  
Guy Meyer ◽  
Florian Scotté ◽  
Nicolas Martelli ◽  
Alexandre Vainchtock ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Venous Thromboembolic Event (VTE) is a common complication for cancer patients, leading to hospitalizations that increase the burden of cancer management. We evaluated the incidence and costs of VTE-related hospitalizations for patients with colon cancer (CC) or lung cancer (LC). Methods: The French national hospital database (PMSI) was analyzed in order to identify patients whose colon cancer or lung cancer was diagnosed in 2010 and who were hospitalized for a VTE at least once during the following two years. The numbers of stays induced by a VTE, and the corresponding number of patients hospitalized, were determined using the disease-specific ICD-10 codes. Associated hospital costs were estimated from the perspective of the third-party payer, using the French official tariffs, on the 1,111 and 1,641 hospitalizations with VTE classified as primary or related diagnosis only (PD / RD) for colon and lung cancer patients, respectively. Results: We identified 47,954 new patients with colon cancer and 39,454 new patients with lung cancer; in each group, 2,866 (6.0%) and 3,775 (9.6%), respectively, were hospitalized for a VTE or had a VTE during their hospital stay. During the 2 years of follow-up of these 6,641 patients, 1,707 (25.7%) were hospitalized for a VTE recurrence. In total, 4,104 stays for CC patients and 5,962 stays for LC patients were analyzed, including stays for recurrence. In colon cancer patients, the mean cost per stay for a VTE classified as PD / RD amounted to 3,612 Euros and 3,457 Euros for first event and recurrence, respectively, and in lung cancer patients, to 3,674 Euros and 3,222 Euros for first event and recurrence, respectively. During the time of the study, mean hospitalization cost per patient who had at least one stay for recurrence was 5,441 Euros and 5,676 Euros in colon and lung cancer, respectively. Over a 2-year period, the total cost of hospital stays induced by VTEs classified as PD / RD reached 3.99 million Euros and 5.90 million Euros for colon and lung cancer, respectively, including a total amount of 1.49 million Euros for VTE recurrence. Conclusion: In colon and lung cancer patients, VTE-related hospitalizations remain frequent and induce an elevated cost. This economic burden may be reduced by decreasing the occurrence of thromboembolic complications, using adequate prophylaxis and efficient management in this at-risk population. Table: Cost of VTE-related hospital stays for patients with colon cancer or lung cancer 1st event Recurrence Global(1st event and recurrence) Colon cancer Mean cost/stay (Euros) 3,612 3,457 3,588 Total cost (Euros) 3,377,219 608,499 3,985,718 Lung cancer Mean cost/stay (Euros) 3,674 3,222 3,599 Total cost (Euros) 5,022,549 879,492 5,902,041 Disclosures Borget: LEO Pharma: Honoraria. Meyer:LEO Pharma: Research Funding. Scotté:LEO Pharma: Honoraria. Martelli:LEO Pharma: Honoraria. Vainchtock:HEVA: Research Funding.


2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6579-6579
Author(s):  
S. Dubey ◽  
A. Griffin ◽  
J. Hwang

6579 Background: Lung cancer patients are associated with feeling of guilt about their disease (Schmidt ASCO 2006) and less likely to be referred to specialists (Wassenaar ASCO 2006). They are also commonly affected by smoking related comorbidities. A study was undertaken to evaluate whether treatment differences between lung and other cancers exist. Methods: Public access data for the year 2005 from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was analyzed. Treatment data were categorized by institution (teaching/research [TR] versus community cancer center [CC]) and tumor type (non-small cell lung cancer-NSCLC, breast, colon cancer). Descriptive analysis was performed with student T tests for proportions. Results: The analysis included 18,960 NSCLC patients from a CC and 33,924 from a TR. More patients at TR than CC had surgery: Stage I 65% vs 52% (p < 0.001), Stage II 35% vs 22% (p < 0.001), respectively. The frequency of chemoradiation for stage I and II was higher in CC than TR: stage I 6% vs 3% (p = 0.10), stage II 19% vs 9% (p = 0.004). The frequency of no first course treatment at initial presentation at CC and TR were the following: stage I 15% vs 6%, stage II 18% vs 8%, stage III 21% vs 19%, stage IV 30% vs 24%. For breast and colon cancer, no major differences in no first course treatments were seen between TR and CC in a stage based analysis. More patients with NSCLC (21.2%) did not receive first course treatment in comparison to breast (3.4%, p < 0.001) or colon cancer (7.8%, p < 0.001). These differences were maintained in stage based analysis of the three tumor types. Conclusions: NSCLC patients are at higher risk of not receiving treatment as opposed to those with breast and colon cancer. While medical comorbidities in lung cancer patients may affect these treatment decisions, we noted a higher incidence of no first course treatment in CC than TR centers. For stage I and II, the frequency of no first course treatment in a CC was twice that of a TR. Such institution based differences were not noted in breast and colon cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2004 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 602-607 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miho UCHIHIRA ◽  
Takahiro EJIMA ◽  
Takao UCHIHIRA ◽  
Jun ARAKI ◽  
Toshiaki KAMEI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document