Federal Employee Attitude Survey, September-October 1983

1993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Attitude Survey ◽  
Federal Employee ◽  
Employee Attitude

Employee Attitude Survey

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Schneider ◽  
Paul J. Hanges ◽  
D. Brent Smith ◽  
Amy Nicole Salvaggio
Keyword(s):  
Attitude Survey ◽  
Employee Attitude

scholarly journals Employee Attitude Surveys in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 150-160
Author(s):  
David G. Moore
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Employee Attitudes ◽  
Attitude Survey ◽  
Employee Attitude ◽  
Attitude Surveys

Summary The Author first discusses generally the employee attitude survey, describing the techniques commonly used, evaluating the ordinary questionnaire technique with its many drawbacks and limitations; these, however, can be — and have been — gradually corrected with time, and one of them has been refined into an instrument called the SRA Employee Inventory. The rest of the article is spent describing and assessing the Inventory, and finally giving the results and trends in employee attitudes which it has yielded.

Evaluating the Equivalence of an Employee Attitude Survey Across Languages, Cultures, and Administration Formats

2003 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen G. Sireci ◽  
James Harter ◽  
Yongwei Yang ◽  
Dennison Bhola
Keyword(s):  
Attitude Survey ◽  
Employee Attitude

Rating Spinal Nerve Extremity Impairment Using the Sixth Edition

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Christopher R. Brigham
Keyword(s):  
Nerve Root ◽  
Spinal Nerve ◽  
Upper Extremities ◽  
Motor Deficits ◽  
Nerve Injuries ◽  
Sixth Edition ◽  
Federal Employee ◽  
Nerve Root Injury ◽  
Root Injury ◽  
Rating Process

Abstract The AMAGuides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (AMA Guides), Sixth Edition, does not provide a separate mechanism for rating spinal nerve injuries as extremity impairment; radiculopathy was reflected in the spinal rating process in Chapter 17, The Spine and Pelvis. Certain jurisdictions, such as the Federal Employee Compensation Act (FECA), rate nerve root injury as impairment involving the extremities rather than as part of the spine. This article presents an approach to rate spinal nerve impairments consistent with the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, methodology. This approach should be used only when a jurisdiction requires ratings for extremities and precludes rating for the spine. A table in this article compares sensory and motor deficits according to the AMA Guides, Sixth and Fifth Editions; evaluators should be aware of changes between editions in methodology used to assign the final impairment. The authors present two tables regarding spinal nerve impairment: one for the upper extremities and one for the lower extremities. Both tables were developed using the methodology defined in the sixth edition. Using these tables and the process defined in the AMA Guides, Sixth Edition, evaluators can rate spinal nerve impairments for jurisdictions that do not permit rating for the spine and require rating for radiculopathy as an extremity impairment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document